skip to main content
10.1145/3406499.3418749acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Domestic Robots for Individuals Living With Loneliness: A Long-Term In-Home Interaction Study Design

Published: 10 November 2020 Publication History

Abstract

A growing area of human-robot interaction explores how robots, for example as companions, can be used to help people manage loneliness. However, we do not yet have research results indicating if people are ready to accept companion robots in their daily lives, and thus if companion robots can actually be successful broadly in society. We present a novel long-term in-home interaction study design that will explore how people accept these robots in their homes and how the robots impact loneliness.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3406499.3418749.mp4)
A growing area of human-robot interaction explores how robots, for example as companions, can be used to help people manage loneliness. However, we do not yet have research results indicating if people are ready to accept companion robots in their daily lives, and thus if companion robots can actually be successful broadly in society. We present a novel long-term in-home interaction study design that will explore how people accept these robots in their homes and how the robots impact loneliness.

References

[1]
A. Stickley et al., 'Loneliness: Its Correlates and Association with Health Behaviours and Outcomes in Nine Countries of the Former Soviet Union,? PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 7, 2013.
[2]
W. J. Chopik, 'The Benefits of Social Technology Use among Older Adults Are Mediated by Reduced Loneliness,' Cyberpsychology, Behav. Soc. Netw., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 551--556, 2016.
[3]
P. B. Brandtzaeg and A. Følstad, Why people use chatbots, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 10673 LNCS, pp. 377--392, 2017.
[4]
J. Pransky, ?AIBO - the no. 1 selling service robot,? Ind. Rob., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 24--26, 2001.
[5]
C. Breazeal, 'Toward social robots,' Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 42. pp. 167--175, 2003.
[6]
S. H. Seo, D. Geiskkovitch, M. Nakane, C. King, and J. E. Young, 'Poor Thing! Would You Feel Sorry for a Simulated Robot': A comparison of empathy toward a physical and a simulated robot,' ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. Human-Robot Interact., vol. 2015-March, pp. 125--132, 2015.
[7]
D. Y. Geiskkovitch, D. Cormier, S. H. Seo, and J. E. Young, 'Please Continue, We Need More Data: An Exploration of Obedience to Robots,' J. Human-Robot Interact., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 82, 2015.
[8]
S. Strohkorb Sebo, M. Traeger, M. Jung, and B. Scassellati, 'The Ripple Effects of Vulnerability: The Effects of a Robot's Vulnerable Behavior on Trust in Human-Robot Teams,' ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. Human-Robot Interact., no. February, pp. 178--186, 2018.
[9]
J. Sung, H. I. Christensen, and R. E. Grinter, 'Sung-2009-RobotsInWild-LT-Use,' pp. 45--52.
[10]
M. R. Banks, L. M. Willoughby, and W. A. Banks, 'Animal-Assisted Therapy and Loneliness in Nursing Homes: Use of Robotic versus Living Dogs,' J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 173--177, 2008.
[11]
L. Riek, 'Wizard of Oz Studies in HRI: A Systematic Review and New Reporting Guidelines,' J. Human-Robot Interact., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 119--136, 2012.
[12]
J. E. Young, R. Hawkins, E. Sharlin, and T. Igarashi, 'Toward acceptable domestic robots: Applying insights from social psychology,' Int. J. Soc. Robot., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 95--108, 2009.
[13]
N. Ezer, A. D. Fisk, and W. A. Rogers, 'Attitudinal and intentional acceptance of domestic robots by younger and older adults,' Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 5615 LNCS, no. PART 2, pp. 39--48, 2009.
[14]
F. D. Davis, 'Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,' MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319--339, 1989.
[15]
R. D. Dewar and J. E. Dutton, 'The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis,' Manage. Sci., vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1422--1433, 1986.
[16]
J. Y. Sung, R. E. Grinter, and H. I. Christensen, 'Domestic robot ecology: An initial framework to unpack long-term acceptance of robots at home,' Int. J. Soc. Robot., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 417--429, 2010.
[17]
S. McGlynn, B. Snook, S. Kemple, T. L. Mitzner, and W. A. Rogers, 'Therapeutic robots for older adults,' pp. 246--247, 2014.
[18]
J. Broekens, M. Heerink, and H. Rosendal, 'Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review,' Gerontechnology, vol. 8, no. 2, 2009.
[19]
P. Marti, M. Bacigalupo, L. Giusti, C. Mennecozzi, and T. Shibata, 'Socially Assistive Robotics in the treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia,' Proc. First IEEE/RAS-EMBS Int. Conf. Biomed. Robot. Biomechatronics, 2006, BioRob 2006, vol. 2006, no. February, pp. 483--488, 2006.
[20]
S. Y. Okita, 'Self-other's perspective taking: The use of therapeutic robot companions as social agents for reducing pain and anxiety in pediatric patients,' Cyberpsychology, Behav. Soc. Netw., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 436--441, 2013.
[21]
K. Wada, T. Shibatal, T. Musha, and S. Kimura, 'Effects of robot therapy for demented patients evaluated by EEG,' 2005 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst. IROS, pp. 2205--2210, 2005.
[22]
K. Wada and T. Shibata, 'Living with seal robots - Its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house,' IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 972--980, 2007.
[23]
R. Bemelmans, G. J. Gelderblom, P. Jonker, and L. de Witte, 'Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A systematic review into effects and effectiveness,' J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 114--120.e1, 2012.
[24]
F. Eyssel and N. Reich, 'Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots) - On the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism,' ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. Human-Robot Interact., pp. 121--122, 2013.
[25]
K. M. Lee, Y. Jung, J. Kim, and S. R. Kim, 'Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents': The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people's loneliness in human-robot interaction,' Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 962--973, 2006.
[26]
S. Hutson, S. L. Lim, P. J. Bentley, N. Bianchi-Berthouze, and A. Bowling, 'Investigating the suitability of social robots for the wellbeing of the elderly,' Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 6974 LNCS, no. PART 1, pp. 578--587, 2011.
[27]
J. F. Hoorn, 'From Lonely to Resilient through Humanoid Robots: Building a New Framework of Resilience,' J. Robot., vol. 2018, 2018.
[28]
M. M. A. De Graaf, S. Ben Allouch, and T. Klamer, 'Sharing a life with Harvey: Exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot,' Comput. Human Behav., vol. 43, pp. 1--14, 2015.
[29]
I. Leite, C. Martinho, and A. Paiva, 'Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey,' Int. J. Soc. Robot., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 291--308, 2013.
[30]
Y. Fernaeus, M. Håkansson, M. Jacobsson, and S. Ljungblad, 'How do you play with a robotic toy animal',? p. 39, 2010.
[31]
M. De Graaf, S. Ben Allouch, and J. Van Dijk, 'Why Do They Refuse to Use My Robot': Reasons for Non-Use Derived from a Long-Term Home Study,? ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. Human-Robot Interact., vol. Part F1271, pp. 224--233, 2017.
[32]
M. M. A. de Graaf, S. Ben Allouch, and J. A. G. M. van Dijk, 'Why Would I Use This in My Home' A Model of Domestic Social Robot Acceptance,' Human-Computer Interact., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 115--173, 2019.
[33]
J.-Y. Sung, L. Guo, R. E. Grinter, and H. I. Christensen, ''My Roomba Is Rambo': Intimate Home Appliances,' in UbiComp 2007: Ubiquitous Computing, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 145--162.
[34]
J. Forlizzi, 'How robotic products become social products: An ethnographic study of cleaning in the home,' HRI 2007 - Proc. 2007 ACM/IEEE Conf. Human-Robot Interact. - Robot as Team Memb., pp. 129--136, 2007.
[35]
M. M. A. De Graaf, S. Ben Allouch, and J. A. G. M. Van Dijk, 'Long-term acceptance of social robots in domestic environments: Insights from a user's perspective,? AAAI Spring Symp. - Tech. Rep., vol. SS-16-01-, no. 2004, pp. 96--103, 2016.
[36]
D. Russell, Ucla Loneliness Scale Version 3 (description of Measure),? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 39, pp. 3--4, 1996.
[37]
A. Wenzel, 'State-Trait Anxiety Inventory,' SAGE Encycl. Abnorm. Clin. Psychol., pp. 3--4, 2017.
[38]
I. Brdar, 'Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS),' Encycl. Qual. Life Well-Being Res., pp. 4918--4920, 2014.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)SnuggleBot the Companion: Exploring In-Home Robot Interaction Strategies to Support Coping With LonelinessProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660702(2972-2986)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2021)We Can Do Better! An Initial Survey Highlighting an Opportunity for More HRI Work on LonelinessCompanion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3434074.3447213(457-462)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2021

Index Terms

  1. Domestic Robots for Individuals Living With Loneliness: A Long-Term In-Home Interaction Study Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HAI '20: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
    November 2020
    304 pages
    ISBN:9781450380546
    DOI:10.1145/3406499
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 November 2020

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. companion robot
    2. loneliness
    3. social human-robot interaction

    Qualifiers

    • Poster

    Funding Sources

    • NSERC

    Conference

    HAI '20
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 121 of 404 submissions, 30%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)SnuggleBot the Companion: Exploring In-Home Robot Interaction Strategies to Support Coping With LonelinessProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660702(2972-2986)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2021)We Can Do Better! An Initial Survey Highlighting an Opportunity for More HRI Work on LonelinessCompanion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3434074.3447213(457-462)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2021

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media