ABSTRACT
Collective impact is an approach for solving complex social problems at scale. The challenge of broadening participation in computing (BPC) is one such problem. The complexity of BPC is compounded by the decentralized nature of public education, where decisions are made primarily at the state level and subject to interpretation at the district level. As such, diversifying computer science (CS) pathways across the nation requires a systemic approach such as collective impact to engage all of the stakeholders who influence CS education and whose decisions can either facilitate or hinder BPC efforts. This experience report discusses how the collective impact framework has been used to advance the work of the Expanding Computing Education Pathways (ECEP) Alliance, an NSF funded BPC Alliance focused on states and state policy as the unit of change. We discuss how the five essential features of collective impact (common agenda, shared measurement, mutually reinforcing activities, continuous communication, and backbone support) coalesce to facilitate ECEP's theory of change. The report highlights specific policy changes that ECEP states have addressed to promote BPC, the flipped accountability that results from a non-hierarchical leadership model, and the challenges of measuring systemic changes as an intermediary to BPC.
- W. Aspray, Participation in Computing: The National Science Foundation's Expansionary Programs. Springer, 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. M. James and S. R. Singer, 'From the NSF: The national science foundation's investments in broadening participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education through research and capacity building,? CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1--8, 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Kurose, ?Dear Colleague Letter?: Pursuing Meaningful Actions in Support of Broadening Participation in Computing ( BPC ).? National Science Foundation, 2017.Google Scholar
- National Science Foundation, ?Broadening Participation in Computing Alliance Program (BPC-A).? [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=503593.Google Scholar
- J. Kania and M. Kramer, 'Collective impact,' Stanford Soc. Innov. Rev., vol. Winter, 2011.Google Scholar
- R. Y. Johnson and D. E. Chubin, 'How One NSF Program Is Changing the Face of Computing,' 2010.Google Scholar
- J. Kania and M. Kramer, 'The Equity Imperative in Collective Impact.' Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2015.Google Scholar
- C. L. Fletcher and J. R. Warner, 'Summary of the CAPE Framework for Assessing Equity in Computer Science Education.' 2019.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Leveraging Collective Impact to Promote Systemic Change in CS Education
Recommendations
Increasing Capacity for Computer Science Education in Rural Areas through a Large-Scale Collective Impact Model
SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationStudents living in rural areas are less likely to attend schools that offer computer science (CS) courses largely because educational institutions in these remote areas lack the resources to staff teaching positions for these courses. This study ...
Supporting Elementary Teacher's Reflections on Equity in CS Education: A Case Study Approach
ICER '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education ResearchThe dearth of women and people of color in the field of computer science is a well-documented phenomenon. Following Obama's 2016 declaration of the need for a nationwide CS for All movement in the US, educators, school districts, states and the US-based ...
CATCHing CS Equity: Counselors, Administrators, and Teachers Collaborating Holistically for Systemic Change
SIGCSE 2024: Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1Improving equity in K-12 Computer Science (CS) education benefits from the collaboration of classroom teachers, school counselors, and school leaders. This paper presents the outcomes of a pilot program that brought together cross-functional teams ...
Comments