skip to main content
10.1145/3408877.3432548acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Confidence, Connection, and Comfort: Reports from an All-Women's CS1 Class

Published:05 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The computer science education community has long strived to create more equitable opportunities for students, such as initiatives to foster inclusion of women and other people from historically marginalized groups in CS. Despite these efforts, the gender gap has persisted, with less than a quarter of CS Bachelor's degrees awarded to women in the United States in 2019. As a community, we must strive to improve women's experiences in CS. This paper describes work conducted at a large research university which has traditionally offered CS1 through lecture sections ranging in size from 400-650 students. In Fall 2019, we offered an alternative small all-women's class (35 students) in addition to the traditional lecture class (601 students; 149 women). Both classes covered the same CS concepts but were led by different instructors. Students reported on their experience through a survey administered at the end of the semester. Students in the all-women's class reported significantly greater social connections and comfort collaborating with their peers compared to women in the traditional class. They also reported significantly greater feelings of support within their class, more confidence in their CS knowledge, and a more welcoming classroom environment compared to women in the traditional class. Additionally, the drop rate for students in the all-women's class was significantly lower (5.7%) than the drop rate for women in the traditional class (24.8%). In light of these positive results, we provide actionable insights for CS educators and discuss how to better support women in their CS endeavors.

References

  1. Christine Alvarado, Zachary Dodds, and Ran Libeskind-Hadas. 2012. Increasing Women's Participation in Computing at Harvey Mudd College. ACM Inroads 3, 4 (2012), 55--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mary Ayre, Julie Mills, and Judith Gill. 2013. 'Yes, I do belong': The Women Who Stay in Engineering. Engineering Studies 5, 3 (2013), 216--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Monica Babes-Vroman, Isabel Juniewicz, Bruno Lucarelli, Nicole Fox, Thu Nguyen, Andrew Tjang, Georgiana Haldeman, Ashni Mehta, and Risham Chokshi. 2017. Exploring Gender Diversity in CS at a Large Public R1 Research University. In Proceedings of the 48th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE). 51--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Amy Baer and Andrew DeOrio. 2020. A Longitudinal View of Gender Balance in a Large Computer Science Program. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE). 23--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Eric P. Bettinger and Bridget Terry Long. 2005. Do Faculty Serve as Role Models? The Impact of Instructor Gender on Female Students. American Economic Review 95, 2 (2005), 152--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Sylvia Beyer, Kristina Rynes, Julie Perrault, Kelly Hay, and Susan Haller. 2003. Gender Differences in Computer Science Students. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE). 49--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Anica G. Bowe, Christopher D. Desjardins, Lesa M. Covington Clarkson, and Frances Lawrenz. 2017. Urban Elementary Single-Sex Math Classrooms: Mitigating Stereotype Threat for African American Girls. Urban Education 52, 3 (2017), 370--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, Rachael S. Dwight, Carolyn S. Miller, C. Dianne Raubenheimer, Matthias F. Stallmann, and Mladen A. Vouk. 2007. A Case for Smaller Class Size with Integrated Lab for Introductory Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 38th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE). 341--345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gail Carmichael. 2008. Girls, Computer Science, and Games. SIGCSE Bulletin 40, 4 (2008), 107--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Sapna Cheryan, Sianna A. Ziegler, Amanda K. Montoya, and Lily Jiang. 2017. Why Are Some STEM Fields More Gender Balanced than Others? Psychological Bulletin 143, 1 (2017), 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Wendy DuBow, Alexis Kaminsky, and Joanna Weidler-Lewis. 2017. Multiple Factors Converge to Influence Women's Persistence in Computing: A Qualitative Analysis. Computing in Science & Engineering 19, 3 (2017), 30--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Rodrigo Duran, Lassi Haaranen, and Arto Hellas. 2020. Gender Differences in Introductory Programming: Comparing MOOCs and Local Courses. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE). 692--698.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Katrina Falkner, Claudia Szabo, Dee Michell, Anna Szorenyi, and Shantel Thyer. 2015. Gender Gap in Academia: Perceptions of Female Computer Science Academics. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE). 111--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Johan Ferla, Martin Valcke, and Yonghong Cai. 2009. Academic Self-Efficacy and Academic Self-Concept: Reconsidering Structural Relationships. Learning and Individual Differences 19, 4 (2009), 499--505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Allan Fisher, Jane Margolis, and Faye Miller. 1997. Undergraduate Women in Computer Science: Experience, Motivation and Culture. In Proceedings of the 28th Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE). 106--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Amanda L. Griffith. 2010. Persistence of Women and Minorities in STEM Field Majors: Is It the School that Matters? Economics of Education Review 29, 6 (2010), 911--922.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sarah D. Herrmann, Robert Mark Adelman, Jessica E. Bodford, Oliver Graudejus, Morris A. Okun, and Virginia S.Y. Kwan. 2016. The Effects of a Female Role Model on Academic Performance and Persistence of Women in STEM Courses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 38, 5 (2016), 258--268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2018. Considerations for Switching: Exploring Factors behind CS Students? Desire to Leave a CS Major. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE). 290--295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Samantha Krieger, Meghan Allen, and Catherine Rawn. 2015. Are Females Disinclined to Tinker in Computer Science?. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE). 102--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. United States Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2019. Employed Persons by Detailed Occupation, Sex, Race, and Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity. (2019). https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lori Pollock, Kathleen McCoy, Sandra Carberry, Namratha Hundigopal, and Xiaoxin You. 2004. Increasing High School Girls? Self Confidence and Awareness of CS through a Positive Summer Experience. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE). 185--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rita Manco Powell. 2008. Improving the Persistence of First-Year Undergraduate Women in Computer Science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 40, 1 (2008), 518--522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lauren Rich, Heather Perry, and Mark Guzdial. 2004. A CS1 Course Designed to Address Interests of Women. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE). 190--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Linda J. Sax, Kathleen J. Lehman, Jerry A Jacobs, M. Allison Kanny, Gloria Lim, Laura Monje-Paulson, and Hilary B. Zimmerman. 2017. Anatomy of an Enduring Gender Gap: The Evolution of Women?s Participation in Computer Science. The Journal of Higher Education 88, 2 (2017), 258--293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Jennifer D. Shapka and Daniel P. Keating. 2003. Effects of a Girls-Only Curriculum During Adolescence: Performance, Persistence, and Engagement in Mathematics and Science. American Educational Research Journal 40, 4 (2003), 929--960.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Jessica J. Summers, S. Natasha Beretvas, Marilla D. Svinicki, and Joanna S. Gorin. 2005. Evaluating Collaborative Learning and Community. Journal of Experimental Education 73, 3 (2005), 165--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Gloria Childress Townsend and Kay Sloan. 2015. An Effective Alternative to the Grace Hopper Celebration. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE). 197--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jennifer Wang, Sepehr Hejazi Moghadam, and Juliet Tiffany-Morales. 2017. Social Perceptions in Computer Science and Implications for Diverse Students. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER). 47--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Rebecca N. Wright, Sally J. Nadler, Thu D. Nguyen, Cynthia N. Sanchez Gomez, and Heather M. Wright. 2019. Living-Learning Community for Women in Computer Science at Rutgers. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE). 286--292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Kimberly Michelle Ying, Lydia G. Pezzullo, Mohona Ahmed, Kassandra Crompton, Jeremiah Blanchard, and Kristy Elizabeth Boyer. 2019. In Their Own Words: Gender Differences in Student Perceptions of Pair Programming. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE). 1053--1059.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Stuart Zweben, Jodi Tims, and Yan Timanovsky. 2019. ACM-NDC Study 2018-- 2019: Seventh Annual Study of Non-Doctoral-Granting Departments in Computing. ACM Inroads 10, 3 (2019), 40--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Confidence, Connection, and Comfort: Reports from an All-Women's CS1 Class

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '21: Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      March 2021
      1454 pages
      ISBN:9781450380621
      DOI:10.1145/3408877

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 March 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024
      SIGCSE Virtual 2024: ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
      November 30 - December 1, 2024
      Virtual Event , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader