skip to main content
10.1145/3409251.3411729acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Foresight Safety: Sharing Drivers’ State among Connected Road Users

Published:21 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

When drivers approach a potentially critical situation, they tend to glance over drivers of neighboring vehicles to gather a mutual understanding of the respective states and intentions. Then, experienced drivers can take quick decisions and prevent the onset of a danger. Yet, such a safety-effective behavior finds no equals in current automated driving, although the technologies to build a similar solution are already available. Therefore, it is important to investigate the effects of sharing drivers’ state among road users to understand the potential benefit for pre-critical situations. A networked simulators study was performed involving two drivers in a cut-in maneuver. Results indicate that when a driver is notified that the driver in the adjacent vehicle is distracted, the preferred reaction is to change lane, putting more space between the respective vehicles. Such a preventive action should therefore become the target behavior for automated vehicles capable of a human-like driving style.

References

  1. P. Pretto, M. Mörtl, N. Neuhuber “Fluid interface concept for automated driving”, in H. Krömker, Ed., MobiTAS 2020: 2 nd International Conference in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Proceedings. Springer International Publishing, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. “§ 1 Grundregeln.” https://www.stvo.de/strassenverkehrsordnung/89-1-grundregeln (accessed Jun. 04, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. H.-P. Schoener, “How Good is Good Enough?” in Autonomous Driving. Springer, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. “2018 Automated Driving Tests | Euro NCAP.” https://www.euroncap.com:443/en/vehicle-safety/safety-campaigns/2018-automated-driving-tests/ (accessed Jun. 03, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Heesen, M. Baumann, J. Kelsch, D. Nause, and M. Friedrich, “Investigation of Cooperative Driving Behaviour during Lane Change in a Multi-Driver Simulation Environment” 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Mattes and A. Hallen, “Surrogate Distraction Measurement Techniques” 2008, pp. 107–122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    AutomotiveUI '20: 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
    September 2020
    116 pages
    ISBN:9781450380669
    DOI:10.1145/3409251

    Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 21 September 2020

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Work in Progress
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate248of566submissions,44%

    Upcoming Conference

  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format