skip to main content
10.1145/3409251.3411730acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

User Requirements for Remote Teleoperation-based Interfaces

Published:21 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite the rapid progress of Autonomous Vehicle (AV) technology, remote human situational assessment continues to be required. Herewith, remote operation is introducing several challenges, as limited perception and difficulty in maintaining Situation Awareness (SA). In this regard, this research provides first-hand SA requirements for remote teleoperation-based interfaces. Complementary to a previous literature review on requirements for Human-Machine Interface for unmanned systems, we conducted two (N = 18, N = 10) user studies. To ascertain the views of the users, we employed two methodologies, in-depth interviews, and traditional statistical analysis to find out specific preferences. We collected a total of 80 statements that we could cluster over 12 categories, presenting a comprehensive overview of SA user requirements. The research is envisioned to be used by others as a tool to help the development of AV teleoperation-based interfaces.

References

  1. S. L. Chappell and K. L. Dunlap. 2006. Incorporating operator situation awareness into the design process: A key ingredient for future combat unmanned rotorcraft. In Annual Forum Proceedings-American Helicopter Society, Vol. 62. American Helicopter Society, INC, 1927.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jessie Y. C. Chen, Ellen C. Haas, and Michael J. Barnes. 2007. Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 37, 6 (2007), 1231–1245. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905819Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jill L. Drury and Stacey D. Scott. 2008. Awareness in unmanned aerial vehicle operations. The International C2 Journal 2, 1 (2008), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mica R. Endsley. 2011. Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design, Second Edition (2nded.). CRC Press, Inc., USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Martin Maguire and Nigel Bevan. 2002. User requirements analysis. In IFIP World Computer Congress, TC 13. Springer, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35610-5_9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Carl E. Nehme, Stacey D. Scott, M. L. Cummings, and Carina Yumi Furusho. 2006. Generating requirements for futuristic hetrogenous unmanned systems. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50, 3, 235–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000306Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Jennifer M. Riley and Mica R. Endsley. 2004. The hunt for situation awareness: Human-robot interaction in search and rescue. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 48. 693–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120404800389Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ronald Scott, Emilie M Roth, Stephen E Deutsch, Erika Malchiodi, Thomas E Kazmierczak, Robert G Eggleston, Samuel R Kuper, and Randall D Whitaker. 2005. Work-centered support systems: A human-centered approach to intelligent system design. IEEE Intelligent Systems 20, 2 (2005), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2005.37Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Aaron Steinfeld. 2004. Interface lessons for fully and semi-autonomous mobile robots. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA’04. 2004, Vol. 3. IEEE, 2752–2757. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2004.1307477Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format