ABSTRACT
Driver performance and behavior can be partially predicated based on one's emotional state. Through ascertaining the emotional state of passengers and employing various mitigation strategies, empathic cars can show potential in improving user experience and driving performance. Challenges remain in the implementation of such strategies, as individual differences play a large role in mediating the effect of affective intervention. Therefore, we propose a workshop that aims to bring together researchers and practitioners interested in affective interfaces and in-vehicle technologies as a forum for the development of targeted emotion intervention methods. During the workshop, we will focus on a common set of use cases and generate approaches that can suit different user groups. By the end of this short workshop, researchers will determine ideal intervention methods for prospective user groups. This will be achieved through the method of insight combination to generate and discuss ideas.
- M. Jeon, 2015.“Towards affect-integrated driving behaviour research,” Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 553–585, 2015, doi: 10.1080/1463922X.2015.1067934.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Underwood, P. Chapman, S. Wright, and D. Crundall, 1999.“Anger while driving,” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 55–68, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S1369-8478(99)00006-6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Jeon, 2017.“Emotions and affect in human factors and human–computer interaction: Taxonomy, theories, approaches, and methods,” in Emotions and Affect in Human Factors and Human-Computer Interaction, Elsevier, 2017, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
- H. Sanghavi, 2020.“Exploring the Influence of anger on takeover performance in semi-automated vehicles,” Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2020.Google Scholar
- E. R. Dahlen and R. P. White, 2006.“The Big Five factors, sensation seeking, and driving anger in the prediction of unsafe driving,” Pers. Individ. Dif., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 903–915, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. C. Schwebel, J. Severson, K. K. Ball, and M. Rizzo, 2006.“Individual difference factors in risky driving: The roles of anger/hostility, conscientiousness, and sensation-seeking,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 801–810, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.02.004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Shahar, 2009.“Self-reported driving behaviors as a function of trait anxiety,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 241–245, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.11.004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. E. Taylor, M. J. Connolly, R. Brookland, and A. Samaranayaka, 2018.“Understanding driving anxiety in older adults,” Maturitas, vol. 118, no. September, pp. 51–55, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.10.008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. R. Dahlen, R. C. Martin, K. Ragan, and M. M. Kuhlman, 2005.“Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness, and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 341–348, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.10.006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Jeon, B. N. Walker, and J. Bin Yim, 2014.“Effects of specific emotions on subjective judgment, driving performance, and perceived workload,” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., vol. 24, pp. 197–209, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Jansen, A. Westphal, M. Jeon, and A. Riener, 2013.“Detection of Drivers’ Incidental and Integral Affect Using Physiological Measures,” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Automot. User Interfaces Interact. Veh. Appl. (AutomotiveUI ’13), no. June 2014, pp. 97–98, 2013, [Online]. Available: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/257985342_Detection_of_Drivers’_Incidental_and_Integral_Affect_Using_Physiological_Measures/file/3deec528080a401cd0.pdf.Google Scholar
- K. Ngamsomphornpong and Y. Punsawad, 2019.“Development of Hybrid EEG-fEMG-based Stress Levels Classification and Biofeedback Training System,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 25–28, 2019, doi: 10.1145/3332340.3332349.Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. M. Fakhrhosseini, S. Landry, Y. Y. Tan, S. Bhattarai, and M. Jeon, 2014.“If you're angry, turn the music on: Music can mitigate anger effects on driving performance,” AutomotiveUI 2014 - 6th Int. Conf. Automot. User Interfaces Interact. Veh. Appl. Coop. with ACM SIGCHI - Proc., no. September, 2014, doi: 10.1145/2667317.2667410.Google Scholar
- C. Jones and I. M. Jonsson, 2008.“Using paralinguistic cues in speech to recognise emotions in older car drivers,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 4868 LNCS, pp. 229–240, 2008, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-85099-1_20.Google Scholar
- K. Ihme, C. Dömeland, M. Freese, and M. Jipp, 2018.“Frustration in the face of the driver: a simulator study on facial muscle activity during frustrated driving,” Interact. Stud., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 487–498, 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I.-M. Jonsson, M. Zajicek, H. Harris, and C. Nass, 2005.“Thank you, I did not see that: in-car speech based information systems for older adults,” in CHI’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2005, pp. 1953–1956.Google Scholar
- B. Donmez, L. N. Boyle, and J. D. Lee, 2006.“The impact of distraction mitigation strategies on driving performance,” Hum. Factors, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 785–804, 2006, doi: 10.1518/001872006779166415.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Steinberger, R. Schroeter, and C. N. Watling, 2017.“From road distraction to safe driving: Evaluating the effects of boredom and gamification on driving behaviour, physiological arousal, and subjective experience,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 75, pp. 714–726, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.019.Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. M. Lundqvist and L. Eriksson, 2019.“Age, cognitive load, and multimodal effects on driver response to directional warning,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 76, no. December 2018, pp. 147–154, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Kourkouta, C. Iliadis, and A. Monios, 2015.“Psychosocial issues in elderly,” Prog. Heal. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 232–237, 2015.Google Scholar
- H. J. Foy, P. Runham, and P. Chapman, 2016.“Prefrontal cortex activation and young driver behaviour: A fNIRS study,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1–18, 2016, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156512.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Li, A. Butz, M. Braun, and F. Alt, 2019.“Designing emotion-aware in-car interactions for unlike markets,” Adjun. Proc. - 11th Int. ACM Conf. Automot. User Interfaces Interact. Veh. Appl. AutomotiveUI 2019, pp. 352–357, 2019, doi: 10.1145/3349263.3351324.Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Bosch ., 2018.“Emotional GaRage: A workshop on in-car emotion recognition and regulation,” Adjun. Proc. - 10th Int. ACM Conf. Automot. User Interfaces Interact. Veh. Appl. AutomotiveUI 2018, pp. 44–49, 2018, doi: 10.1145/3239092.3239098.Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Emotional GaRage: A Workshop on In-Car Emotion Recognition and Regulation
AutomotiveUI '18: Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsIn-car emotion detection and regulation have become an emerging and important branch of research within the automotive domain. Different emotional states can greatly influence human driving performance and user experience both in manual and automated ...
Emotion GaRage Vol. III: A Workshop on Affective In-Vehicle Display Applications
AutomotiveUI '22: Adjunct Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsEmpathic in-vehicle interfaces can address driver affect and mitigate decreases in driving performance and behavior that are associated with emotional states. Empathic vehicles can detect and employ a variety of intervention modalities to change user ...
“I See You”: Comparing the Effects of Affective Empathy and Cognitive Empathy on Drivers' Affective States and Driving Behavior in Frustrating Driving Contexts.
AutomotiveUI '23 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsDespite extensive analysis into the relationship between emotion and driving, the effects of empathy on driving remain less explored. This paper focuses on the role of empathy, particularly cognitive and affective empathy, as a potential mitigator of ...
Comments