skip to main content
10.1145/3409915.3409919acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicomsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

PM10 Prediction Using CART Method Depending on the Number of Observations

Published:30 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The main air pollutant all around the world is particulate matter PM10. This is particulate matter smaller than 10 microns. In the human body, harmful particles lead to serious health problems, causing chronic lung disease, asthma, bronchitis, and heart failure. Statistics for Bulgaria show that an average of 66-68% of mortality is due to exactly such cardiovascular disease. This paper applies the powerful Classification and Regression Tree (CART) method to analyze data about PM10 air pollution for the city of Smolyan. The modeling procedure found that depending on the number of observations, the obtained models approximate the actual data to a different degree. The study uses mean daily measurements for the period from 1 January 2010 to 27 April 2018. The obtained results show that the best model approximates the actual measured values of PM10 up to 87%. The selected best CART model is applied to forecast future pollution 3 days ahead.

References

  1. Pao-Wen and G., L. 2009. Simulation of the daily average PM10 concentrations at Ta-Liao with Box-Jenkins time series models and multivariate analysis. Atmospheric Environment 43, (Apr. 2009), 2104--2113. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.055.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zheleva, I., Veleva, E., and Filipova, M. 2017. Analysis and modeling of daily air pollutants in the city of Ruse, Bulgaria. In International conference AMITANS (Albena, Bulgaria, June 21-26, 2017). AIP Conference Proceedings 1895, 030007--1-03000-10. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5007366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stoimenova, M. 2016. Stochastic modeling of problematic air pollution with particulate matter in the city of Pernik, Bulgaria. Ecologia Balkanica. 8, 2 (Dec. 2016), 33--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jaiswal, A., Samuel, C., and Kadabgaon, V. M. 2018. Statistical trend analysis and forecast modeling of air pollutants. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management. 4, 4 (Nov. 2018), 427--438. DOI= https://www.doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2018.04.004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hung, C., Hung, C. N., and Lin, S. Y. 2014. Predicting time series using integration of moving Average and support vector regression. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing. 4, 6 (Dec. 2014), 492--495. DOI= http://doi.org/10.7763/IJMLC.2014.V6.460Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Parashar, H. J., Vijendra, S., and Vasudeva, N. 2012. An efficient classification approach for data Mining. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing. 2, 4 (Aug. 2012), 446--448. DOI= http://doi.org/10.7763/IJMILC.2012.V2.164Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ahani, I. K., Salari, M., and Shadman, A. 2019. Statistical models for multi-step-ahead forecasting of fine particulate matter in urban areas. Atmospheric Pollution Research. 10, 3 (May. 2019), 689--700. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.11.006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Biancofiore, F., Busilacchio, M., Verdecchia, M., Tomassetti, B., Aruffo, E., Bianco, S., Tommaso, S. Di., Colangeli, C., Rosatelli, G., and Carlo, P. Di. 2017. Recursive neural network model for analysis and forecast of PM10 and PM2.5. Atmospheric Pollution Research. 8, 4 (Jan. 2017), 652--659. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.12.014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Aladag, C. H., Egrioglu, E., and Kadilar, C. 2009. Forecasting nonlinear time series with a hybrid methodology. Applied Mathematics Letters. 22, 9 (Sep. 2009), 1467--1470. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2009.02.006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bougoudis, I., Demertzis, K., and Iliadis, L. 2016. HISYCOL a hybrid computational intelligence system for combined machine learning: the case of air pollution modelling in Athens. Neural Computing and Applications. 27, 5 (Jul. 2016), 1191--1206. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1927-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Wang, P., Qin, Y., and Wang, H. 2017. Forecasting of particulate matter time series using wavelet analysis and wavelet-ARMA/ARIMA model in Taiyuan, China. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 67, 7 (Feb. 2017), 776--788. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2017.1292968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Choi, W., Paulson, S. E., Casmassi, J., and Winer, A. M. 2013. Evaluating meteorological comparability in air quality studies: Classification and regression trees for primary pollutants in California's South Coast Air Basin. Atmospheric Environment. 64 (Jan. 2013), 150--159. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.049.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gocheva-Ilieva, S., Voynikova, D., Stoimenova, M., Ivanov, A., and Iliev, I. 2019. Regression trees modeling of time series for air pollution analysis and forecasting. Neural Computing and Applications. 31, 12 (Aug. 2019), 9023--9039. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04432-1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Roy, S. S., Pratyush, C., and Barna, C. 2018. Predicting ozone layer concentration using multivariate adaptive regression splines, random forest and classification and regression tree. Soft Computing Applications. SOFA 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 634, (Oct. 2017), 140--152. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62524-9_11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Choubin, B., Abdolshahnejad, M., Moradi, E., Querol, X., Mosavi, A., Shamshirband, S., and Ghamisi, P. 2019. Spatial hazard assessment of the PM10 using machine learning models in Barcelona, Spain. Science of the Total Environment. 701, 134474 (Jan. 2020). DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Cohen, J. C. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. 2008. Official Journal of the European Union, L 152/1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Morgan, J. N., and Sonquist, J. A. 1963. Problems in an analysis of survey data and a proposal. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 58, 302 (Jun. 1963), 415--434. DOI= https://www.doi.org/10.2307/2283276Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., and Stone, C. J. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth Advanced Books and Software, Belmont, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Wu, X., and Kumar, V. 2009. The Top Ten Algorithms in Data Mining. Chapman & Hall / CRC, Boca Raton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Steinberg, D., and Golovnya, M. 2007. CART 6.0 User's Guide. Salford Systems, San Diego, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. PM10 Prediction Using CART Method Depending on the Number of Observations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICoMS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Mathematics and Statistics
      June 2020
      77 pages
      ISBN:9781450375412
      DOI:10.1145/3409915

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 July 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader