skip to main content
10.1145/3410886.3410894acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigating the roles and competencies of a tangible game facilitator

Published:14 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

TANKS is a tangible coding game that introduces coding to South African learners of ages 10-14yrs. It is aimed to initiate and stimulate learning using facilitators. Facilitators use untraditional teaching methods because they are highly influential on the potential success of the training. Also, facilitators undertook face-to-face contact sessions since TANKS require the use of a smart phone and tokens. Applying the feed-forward learning flow model, a supportive school leadership by principal or teachers creates an academic coding culture, which then will necessitate learners’ competitive behaviour through the adoption of a performance-based appraisal practice, measured by each game level completed, in order to improve coding interest and TANKS performance by learners. A phenomenological qualitative study design approach of 6 facilitators of face-to-face interview using an adapted semi-structured questionnaire was used. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis using an explanation building strategy was applied in this study. Results identified some themes such as: “understanding of tangible game”, “facilitator's lived experience”, “roles of a facilitator”, “learner experience”, “qualities of a facilitator”, “facilitator-learner communication”, “team vs individual work” and “facilitator's challenges”. Each theme is further explained in the study. Limitations included small interviewee numbers as the threat of a nationwide pandemic loomed. By applying the feed-forward learning flow model, we conclude that a supportive school leadership by principal or teachers creates an academic coding culture, which then will necessitate learners’ competitive behaviour through the adoption of a performance-based appraisal practice, in order to improve coding interest and TANKS performance by learners.

References

  1. Tangibl. 2020. Introduction. Retrieved on 13 April 2020, from https://www.tangiblgames.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ITweb.co.za. 2020. TANKS: An app that teaches coding, without a computer. Retrieved on 13 April 2020, from https://www.itweb.co.za/content/xnklOvzbQnpv4Ymz, 2019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mokhtar, Rashidah, Mohd Lezam Lehat, Nora Mohd Basir, and Yusnita Sokman. 2015. A Tangible Game-Based Approach for Introducing Programming to Elementary School Students.  International Journal of Information and Education Technology 5(4): 246-249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang, Wen-Long, and Chun-Yi Lee. 2013. Trust as a learning facilitator that affects students' learning performance in the Facebook community: An investigation in a business planning writing course.  Computers & Education 62: 320-327Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Thornton, Kate, and Pak Yoong. 2011. The role of the blended action learning facilitator: an enabler of learning and a trusted inquisitor.  Action Learning: Research and Practice 8(2): 129-146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Thornhill, Adrian, Mark Saunders, and Philip Lewis. 2009. Research methods for business students. Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Thorne, Sally. 2000. Data analysis in qualitative research.  Evidence-based nursing 3(3): 68-70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Adendorff, Debra Elizabeth. 2005. An investigation into the roles and competencies of an online facilitator. PhD dissertation, University of Pretoria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Etikan, Ilker, Sulaiman Abubakar Musa, and Rukayya Sunusi Alkassim. 2016. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling.  American journal of theoretical and applied statistics 5(1): 1-4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P.M. Camic, D.L. Long, A.T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K.J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (p. 57–71), American Psychological Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Marco, Javier, Eva Cerezo, and Sandra Baldassarri. 2013. Bringing tabletop technology to all: evaluating a tangible farm game with kindergarten and special needs children.  Personal and ubiquitous computing 17(8): 1577-1591. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sanderson, Helena, and Jacqueline Lea. 2012. Implementation of the clinical facilitation model within an Australian rural setting: The role of the clinical facilitator.  Nurse education in practice 12(6): 333-339.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. El Mawas, Nour, Irina Tal, Arghir Moldovan, Diana Bogusevschi, Josephine Andrews, Gabriel-Miro Muntean, and Cristina Muntean. 2018. Final frontier game: A case study on learner experience.CSEDU - 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Mar 2018, Funchal, Portugal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Elledge, Carole, Ayoade Avworo, Josefina Cochetti, Clarissa Carvalho, and Patti Grota. 2019. Characteristics of facilitators in knowledge translation: an integrative review.  Collegian 26(1): 171-182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. O'Toole, Chris. 2017. Networked e-Learning: The changing facilitator–learner relationship, a facilitators’ perspective; A Phenomenological Investigation." In  Seminar.net 13(1)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Berta, Whitney, Lisa Cranley, James W. Dearing, Elizabeth J. Dogherty, Janet E. Squires, and Carole A. Estabrooks. 2015. Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory.  Implementation Science 10(1): 141-154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jung, Yuhee, and Norihiko Takeuchi. 2010. Performance implications for the relationships among top management leadership, organizational culture, and appraisal practice: Testing two theory-based models of organizational learning theory in Japan.  The International Journal of Human Resource Management 21(11): 1931-1950.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lessard, Sylvie, Céline Bareil, Lyne Lalonde, Fabie Duhamel, Eveline Hudon, Johanne Goudreau, and Lise Lévesque. 2015. External facilitators and interprofessional facilitation teams: a qualitative study of their roles in supporting practice change.  Implementation Science 11(1): 97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Skrypnyk, Oleksandra, Srećko Joksimović, Vitomir Kovanović, Dragan Gašević, and Shane Dawson. 2015. Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC.  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 16(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Colas, Jean-François, Peter B. Sloep, and Muriel Garreta-Domingo. 2016. The effect of multilingual facilitation on active participation in MOOCs.  International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 17(4): 280-314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Modupeola, Olagunju Robert. 2013. Code-Switching as a teaching strategy: Implication for English Language teaching and learning in a multilingual society.  IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science 14(3): 92-94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Alvarez, Fernando E., David Argente, and Francesco Lippi. 2020. A simple planning problem for covid-19 lockdown. No. w26981. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SAICSIT '20: Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists 2020
    September 2020
    258 pages
    ISBN:9781450388474
    DOI:10.1145/3410886

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 September 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate187of439submissions,43%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format