skip to main content
10.1145/3410886.3410911acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An instantiation of a process model towards health interoperability

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

In response to the critical problem of fragmentation of health information, a process model towards health interoperability is articulated. In conceptualizing and instantiating the research artifact, the DSR method was operationalized through the Mullarkey and Hevner elaborated Action Design Research (ADR) process model. The ADR process model was considered an appropriate choice as it caters for an immersive exploration as part of an in-situ context. This study articulated in this paper is considered to have a problem-centered entry point, as it is driven by the researcher-practitioner's desire to understand what a “better artefact would look like”. The ADR process model is adopted, since it's iterative and in-situ nature is in line with the overreaching organizational research aim to develop a process model that can describe and guide the process of testing conformance of health information systems to the eHealth interoperability standards prescribed by the Health Normative Standards Framework in South Africa.

References

  1. Adebesin, F., , Barriers & challenges to the adoption of E-Health standards in Africa.2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Terry, N., Pit Crews with Computers: Can Health Information Technology Fix Fragmented Care?2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dixon, B., Health Information Exchange: Navigating and Managing a Network of Health Information Systems. 2016: Academic Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. National Department of Health and Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Health Normative Standards Framework for eHealth Interoperability. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Nilsen, P., Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science, 2015. 10 (1): p. 53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kindrick, J.D., J.A. Sauter, and R.S. Matthews, Improving conformance and interoperability testing.StandardView, 1996. 4 (1): p. 61-68. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Moseley, S., S. Randall, and A. Wiles. Experience within ETSI of the combined roles of conformance testing and interoperability testing. in Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2003. The 3rd Conference on. 2003. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gebase, L., R. Snelick, and M. Skall. Conformance Testing and Interoperability: A Case Study in Healthcare Data Exchange. in Software Engineering Research and Practice. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Oemig, F. and R. Snelick, Healthcare interoperability standards compliance handbook.Cham, The Netherlands: Springer International Publishing, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sokol, A.W. and M.D. Hogan, NIST Cloud Computing Standards Roadmap. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Monkewich, O., Tutorial on Conformance and Interoperability Testing.International Telecommunication Union (ITU), December, 2006.8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hevner, A.R., , Design science in information systems research.Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2004. 28 (1): p. 75-105. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gregor, S. and A.R. Hevner, The Front End of Innovation: Perspectives on Creativity, Knowledge and Design, in New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda. 2015, Springer. p. 249-263. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hevner, A.R. and N. Wickramasinghe, Design Science Research Opportunities in Health Care, in Theories to Inform Superior Health Informatics Research and Practice. 2018, Springer. p. 3-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gregor, S., The Nature of Theory in Information Systems.Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2006. 30 (3): p. 611 - 642. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gill, A.Q. and E. Chew, Configuration information system architecture: Insights from applied action design research.Information & Management, 2019. 56 (4): p. 507-525.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Haj-Bolouri, A., , Action design research in practice: lessons and concerns.2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sein, M.K., , Action design research MIS Quarterly, 2011. 35 (1): p. 37 - 56. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Venable, J.R., A framework for design science research activities, in Emerging trends and challenges in information technology management, M. Khosrow-Pour, Editor. 2006, IDEA Group Publishing: Hersey PA. p. 21-24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hevner, A.R., A three cycle view of design science research.Scandinavian journal of information systems, 2007. 19 (2): p. 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Drechsler, A., TOWARDS A UNIFYING FRAMEWORK FOR DESIGN AND ACTION-ORIENTED IS RESEARCH.2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mullarkey, M.T. and A.R. Hevner, An elaborated action design research process model.European Journal of Information Systems, 2019. 28 (1): p. 6-20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Peffers, K., , A Design Science Research methodology for information systems research.Journal of Management Information Systems, 2008. 24 (3): p. 45 - 77. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Peffers, K., , A design science research methodology for information systems research.Journal of Management Information Systems, 2007. 24 (3): p. 45 - 77. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. HIMSS, HIMSS Dictionary of Healthcare Information Technology Terms, Acronyms and Organisations. 2013, Chicago: Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Geraci, A., , IEEE standard computer dictionary: Compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries. 1991: IEEE Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Iroju, O., , Interoperability in healthcare: benefits, challenges and resolutions.International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 2013. 3 (1): p. 262-270.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. HIQA, Health Information and Quality Authority: Overview of Healthcare Interoperability Standards. 2013, Health Information and Quality AuthorityGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Rezaei, R., T.K. Chiew, and S.P. Lee, An interoperability model for ultra large scale systems.Advances in Engineering Software, 2014.67: p. 22-46. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. ISO, Guide 2–Standardization and related activities-General vocabulary. Geneva: ISO. 2004: International Standards Organisation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Benson, T. and G. Grieve, Principles of Health Interoperability. 2016: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Union, I.T., E-Health Standards and Interoperability. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Hawn, C., Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care.Health affairs, 2009. 28 (2): p. 361-368.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Wager, K.A., F.W. Lee, and J.P. Glaser, Health care information systems: a practical approach for health care management. 2017: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Kotze, P., , A review of interoperability standards in e-Health and imperatives for their adoption in Africa.South African Computer Journal, 2013. 50 (1): p. 55-72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. National Planning Commission, National Development Plan 2030: Our future–make it work. Presidency of South Africa, Pretoria, 2012.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. National Department of Health, eHealth Strategy South Africa 2012-2016. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Chetty, eHealth Summary for Presidential Health Summit 2018, CSIR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Raj, A., , Data network protocol conformance test system. 2002, Google Patents.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Caruso, F. and A. Umar, Architectures to survive technological and business turbulences.Information Systems Frontiers, 2004. 6 (1): p. 9-21. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Woo, J., N. Ivezic, and H. Cho, Agile test framework for business-to-business interoperability.Information Systems Frontiers, 2012. 14 (3): p. 789-808. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. IHE International, IHE Changing the way in which healthcare connects. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. IHE International, IHE Profiles. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Health Level Seven International, HL7 Reference Information Model. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. IHE. IHE-XDS infrastructuur verbetert medische behandeling van CVA-patiënten in Noord-Nederland. 2016 [cited 2018 August]; Available from: https://www.ihe-nl.org/nieuws/ihe-xds-infrastructuur-verbetert-medische-behandeling-van-cva-patienten-in-.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SAICSIT '20: Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists 2020
    September 2020
    258 pages
    ISBN:9781450388474
    DOI:10.1145/3410886

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 September 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate187of439submissions,43%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format