skip to main content
10.1145/3410886.3410915acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Baby Boomers’ intention to use branch or digital banking channels in South Africa: An exploratory study

Published:14 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

With Baby Boomers comprising a significant and profitable segment of the South African population, understanding the banking behaviour of seniors becomes an important task for banking institutions. With minimal literature dedicated to the banking behaviour of seniors, this study aimed to outline aspects which influenced Boomer's intention to use branch or digital channels and identify reasons for this. Literature highlighted the significant role of behavioural beliefs, trust, normative beliefs, perceived usefulness, perceived secureness and perceived control in banking intention, with gender, computer literacy, banking institution and banking channel used, being the major differences when choosing to walk into a branch or bank electronically. By applying the Kruskal-Wallis test on data collected from 281 Boomers across Gauteng, it was found that the gender of Boomers did not have any differences across branch and digital channels. By applying banking channel split, differences were found among the branch, digital and both channel groups for all six variables for both branch and DB intention. Reasons for these differences were also outlined within. Based on these findings, recommendations for the banking institutions of SA have been provided. Suggestions on future research initiatives are included, with linking banking intention to banking behaviour and conducting comparisons to other generational groups being notable topics.

References

  1. C. Flavián, M. Guinalíu, and E. Torres, “How bricks‐and‐mortar attributes affect online banking adoption,” Int. J. Bank Mark., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 406–423, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1108/02652320610701735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. PwC Digital Consumer, “2019 Consumer Digital Banking Survey,” 2019. Accessed: May 25, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/financial-services/library/pdf/pwc-consumer-digital-banking-survey-2019.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. N. Howe and W. Strauss, “The Next 20 Years: How Customer and Workforce Attitudes Will Evolve,” Harvard Business Review, no. July–August 2007, Jul. 01, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Discovery, “Online vs. Banking at a Branch: Which is better for you.” 2014. https://www.discover.com/online-banking/banking-topics/online-vs-branches/ (accessed May 11, 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. V. Muzofa, “Online banking usage amongst South African consumers: An empirical study of the impact of current usage on future usage intention.” Witwatersrand, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T. Pikkarainen, K. Pikkarainen, H. Karjaluoto, and S. Pahnila, “Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model,” Internet Res., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 224–235, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1108/10662240410542652.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. M. Singh, “Trends in South African Internet banking,” Aslib Proc., vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 187–196, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1108/00012530410539368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. D. K. Maduku, “Predicting retail banking customers’ attitude towards Internet banking services in South Africa,” South. Afr. Bus. Rev., vol. 17, no. 3, p. 25, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Wu, “Factors that influence the adoption of internet banking by South Africans in the eThekweni metropolitan region,” Thesis, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. A. M. V. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, and E. T. Higgins, Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Collection: Volumes 1 & 2. SAGE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Coetzee, “Client-Centricity In South African Retail Banking,” Int. Bus. Econ. Res. J. IBER, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 997, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.19030/iber.v13i5.8767.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. K. Kim and B. Prabhakar, “Initial trust and the adoption of B2C e-commerce: The case of internet banking,” Adv. Inf. Syst., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 50–64, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.1145/1007965.1007970. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. M. Aladwani, “Online banking: a field study of drivers, development challenges, and expectations,” Int. J. Inf. Manag., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 213–225, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0268-4012(01)00011-1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. T. C. Ramavhona and S. Mokwena, “Factors influencing Internet banking adoption in South African rural areas,” SA J. Inf. Manag., vol. 18, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.4102/sajim.v18i2.642.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. R. R. Nitsure, “E-Banking: Challenges and Opportunities,” Econ. Polit. Wkly., vol. 38, no. 51/52, pp. 5377–5381, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Laforet and X. Li, “Consumers’ attitudes towards online and mobile banking in China,” Int. J. Bank Mark., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 362–380, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1108/02652320510629250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. R. K. Srivastava, “Customer's perception on usage of internet banking,” Innov. Mark, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 8, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. L. Bradley and K. Stewart, “The Diffusion of Online Banking,” J. Mark. Manag, vol. 19, no. 9–10, pp. 1087–1109, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2003.9728252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. E. P. Gilje, E. Loutskina, and P. E. Strahan, “Exporting Liquidity: Branch Banking and Financial Integration,” J. Finance, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 1159–1184, 2016, doi: 10.1111/jofi.12387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. A. Alalwan, Y. K. Dwivedi, N. P. P. Rana, and M. D. Williams, “Consumer adoption of mobile banking in Jordan: Examining the role of usefulness, ease of use, perceived risk and self-efficacy,” J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 118–139, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1108/JEIM-04-2015-0035.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. D. Gefen, E. Karahanna, and D. W. Straub, “Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model,” MIS Q., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 51–90, 2003, doi: 10.2307/30036519. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. I. Sinha and S. Mukherjee, “Acceptance of technology, related factors in use of off branch e-banking: an Indian case study,” J. High Technol. Manag. Res., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 88–100, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.hitech.2016.04.008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. K. B. Yap, D. H. Wong, C. Loh, and R. Bak, “Offline and online banking – where to draw the line when building trust in e-banking?” Int. J. Bank Mark., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 27–46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. F. Liébana-Cabanillas, F. Muñoz-Leiva, J. Sánchez-Fernández, and M. I. Viedma-del Jesús, “The moderating effect of user experience on satisfaction with electronic banking: empirical evidence from the Spanish case,” Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manag, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 141–165, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10257-015-0277-4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. E. Karahanna, D. W. Straub, and N. L. Chervany, “Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs,” MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 183–213, Dec. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. V. Mishra and V. Singh, “Selection of appropriate electronic banking channel alternative: Critical analysis using analytical hierarchy process,” Int. J. Bank Mark., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 223–242, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1108/IJBM-09-2013-0099.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. S. C. Chiemeke and A. E. Evwiekpaefe, “A conceptual framework of a modified unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) Model with Nigerian factors in E-commerce adoption,” Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 12, p. 7, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. S. Green and J.-P. V. Belle, “Customer Expectations of Internet Banking in South Africa,” 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. E. Ahmed and G. Phin, “Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking in Malaysia | Open Access Journals,” J. Internet Bank. Commer, vol. 21, 2016, Accessed: May 25, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.icommercecentral.com/open-access/factors-influencing-the-adoption-of-internet-banking-in-malaysia.php?aid=70192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. A. Kreger and C. of U. D. Agency, “How to Design a Millennial Bank,” The Financial Brand, Jan. 12, 2018. https://thefinancialbrand.com/69782/digital-banking-millennial-gen-z-experience-design-banking-trends/ (accessed May 25, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. D. Gefen and D. W. Straub, “Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model,” MIS Q., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 389–400, 1997, doi: 10.2307/249720. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. J. M. Kolodinsky, J. M. Hogarth, and M. A. Hilgert, “The adoption of electronic banking technologies by U.S. consumers,” Int. J. Bank Mark., pp. 238–259, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. G. Kim, B. Shin, and H. G. Lee, “Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking,” Inf. Syst. J., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 283–311, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00269.x.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. B. Vatanasombut, M. Igbaria, A. C. Stylianou, and W. Rodgers, “Information systems continuance intention of web-based applications customers: The case of online banking,” Inf. Manage., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 419–428, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2008.03.005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. D. D. Schoenbachler and G. L. Gordon, “Multi‐channel shopping: understanding what drives channel choice,” J. Consum. Mark, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 42–53, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1108/07363760210414943.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. S. N. Baraghani, “Baraghani, S. N. (2007). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking. Lulea University of Technology.,” Lulea University of Technology, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. S. S. StatsSA, “Statistics South Africa | The South Africa I Know, The Home I Understand.” http://www.statssa.gov.za/ (accessed May 25, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. K. Maree, First Steps in Research. Van Schaik Publishers, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education. Routledge, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. F. C. Lunenburg and B. J. Irby, Writing a Successful Thesis or Dissertation: Tips and Strategies for Students in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. California: Corwin Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, and B. J. Babin, Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. R. Codita, Contingency Factors of Marketing-Mix Standardization: German Consumer Goods Companies in Central and Eastern Europe. Gabler Verlag, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SAICSIT '20: Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists 2020
    September 2020
    258 pages
    ISBN:9781450388474
    DOI:10.1145/3410886

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 September 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate187of439submissions,43%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format