skip to main content
10.1145/3411174.3411197acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicccmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

New Product Development Architectural Framework for Sustainability and Innovation within Telecommunication Industry

Published:26 August 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

New product development is a ready-to-use innovation method that elaborate the relevant factors such as production and development cost, time to market and product value to own a higher level of technical, logical and organizational uncertainty rather than simply redesigning the product to attract the customer. Given the increasing uncertainty in the new product development process, standard general rules cannot be applied to improving an existing product and it is necessary to conduct a more open stage of brainstorming. This study explores the investigation phase and design approach to developing a new product development framework that includes resources, activity and interference by examining three telecommunication companies as case study. To allow the identification reveal comprehensive, concrete and consistent component, the study focused on several companies within the telecommunication industry.

References

  1. K.T. Ulrich and L. Rosenkopf. Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Towards a Sociology of Technological Evolution. In Research in Organizational Behavior (Eds.) B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings, Greenwich: JAI Press, 311--347 (1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. K.E. Harper and J. Zheng. Exploring Software Architecture Context. Proc. - 12th Work. IEEE/IFIP Conf. Softw. Archit. WICSA 2015, pp. 123--126, 2015, doi: 10.1109/WICSA.2015.22Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Lubis, A.R. Lubis, B. Lubis and A. Lubis. Incremental Innovation towards Business Performance: Data Management Challenges in Healthcare Industry in Indonesia. MATEC Web of Conference 218, 04015 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. Lubis, R. Fauzi, E. Sutoyo and S. Abdulmana. Responsive Innovation through Perceived Shared Values and Preferences of Customers. J. of Physics: Conf. Series (2019) vol. 1361(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Lubis, R. Fauzi and I.F. Zamzami. The Development of Radical Innovation with the Digital Gift. J. of Physics: Conf. Series (2019 vol. 1361(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C.H. Loch and S. Kavadias. Managing New Product Development: An Evolutionary Framework. In Handbook of New Product Development Management (Eds.) C.H. Loch and S. Kavadias, Elsevier: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1--26 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. De Meyer and C.H. Loch. Tehnology Strategy. In Handbook of New Product Development Management (Eds.) C.H. Loch and S. Kavadias, Elsevier: Butterworth-Heinemann, 27--48 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S.C. Sommer, C.H. Loch and M.T. Pich. Project Risk Management in New Product Development. In Handbook of New Product Development Management (Eds.) C.H. Loch and S. Kavadias, Elsevier: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1--26 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. L. Bass, P. Clements, R. Kazman, and M. Klein, "Evaluating the software architecture competence of organizations," 7th IEEE/IFIP Work. Conf. Softw. Archit. WICSA 2008, pp. 249--252, 2008, doi: 10.1109/WICSA.2008.12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. W.D. Yang, Q. Chen, and N. Li. A framework-based model of software construction. ICSESS - Proc. IEEE 2nd International Conference Software Engineering Serv. Sci., pp. 286--289 (2011). doi: 10.1109/ICSESS.2011.5982310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. T.O. Kowang, C.S. Long, and A. Rasli. New Product Development Framework for Multinational Multi-locations based Organizations in South East Asia. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 129, no. May, pp. 68--74 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.649.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J.R. Hauser and E. Dahan. New Product Development. In Marketing Management: Essential Marketing Knowledge and Practice (Eds.) R. Grover and N.K. Malhotra, McGraw Hill: Ohio, Chapter 8 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Kazimierska and M. Grebosz-Krawczyk. New Product Development (NPD) Process - An Example of Industrial Sector. WManagement Systems in Production Engineering, vol. 25(4), pp. 246--250, (2017), doi: 10.1515/mspe-2017-0035Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Ouk. New Service Development Process in Telecom Industry: The Telefonica Case Study. Master of Science Thesis. KTH Industrial Engineering and Management, Machine Design, Stockholm, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. G. Barczak. New Product Strategy, Structure, Process and Performance in the Telecommunications Industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management (1995) vol. 12(3). doi: 10.1111/1540-5885.1230224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Kosaroglu and R.A. Hunt. Projects and Their Challenges for New Product Development in the Telecommunications Industry. Int. Journal of Managing Projects in Business (2009) vol. 2(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Gill and J. Rodriguez-Ramos. Reviewing Organizational Design in a Fast-Chaning Context. In Reshaping Telco Organization to Meet the Industry's New Challenges (Eds.) McKinsey&Company white paper (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. H. Halaoui, H. Fadel, M. Makki and M. Mansour. Hitting the Target: Analytical Imperative for Telecom Marketers in Emerging Markets. Strategy& Formerly Booz & Company white paper (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A.R. Wardhani, N. Acur, and K. Mendibil. Human capital, social capital and innovation outcome: A systematic review and research agenda. IEEE Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Eng. Manag., vol. 2016-December, pp. 355--359, 2016, doi: 10.1109/IEEM.2016.7797896.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. C. Supaartagorn. Web application for automatic code generator using a structured flowchart. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Softw. Eng. Serv. Sci. ICSESS, vol. 2017-Novem, pp. 114--117, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICSESS.2017.8342876.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Elsayed. A framework for using semantic relations in conceptual structures. Proc. - 8th IEEE Int. Conf. Adv. Learn. Technol. ICALT 2008, pp. 1069--1070, 2008, doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2008.247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Q. Jiang, W. Zhong, and Y. Hu. The construction of conceptual model of working capital management based on SCM. Int. Conf. Futur. Inf. Technol. Manag. Eng. FITME 2010, vol. 1, pp. 338--341, 2010, doi: 10.1109/FITME.2010.5656310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. K.A. Desender. "Corporate Governance and Cost of Equity Capital: An Efficiency Analysis." SSRN Electron. J., 2011, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1499768.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. W. Xiao. Financial risks and countermeasures of debt financing. Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligent, Management Science and Electronic Commerce (AIMSEC), pp. 2104--2107 (2011). doi: 10.1109/aimsec.2011.6011074.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. J.E.P. Puig, S. Hoekstra, B. Huisman and L.A.M. van Dongen. Supportability and purchasing decisions for capital assets: Positioning paper. IET Conf. Publ., vol. 2011, no. 584 CP, pp. 1--6, 2011, doi: 10.1049/cp.2011.0566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. N. Bhuiyan. A Framework for Succesful New Product Development. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (2011), vol. 4(4), pp. 746--770.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. New Product Development Architectural Framework for Sustainability and Innovation within Telecommunication Industry

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCCM '20: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer and Communications Management
      July 2020
      152 pages
      ISBN:9781450387668
      DOI:10.1145/3411174

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 August 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader