skip to main content
10.1145/3411295.3411308acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnanocomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A simulation framework for connecting in-body nano communication with out-of-body devices

Published:07 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a novel simulation framework bridging the gap between in-body nano communication and out-of-body body area network (BAN). We assume nanobots freely flowing within the blood system. Their mobility can be modeled using the BloodVoyagerS module. The communication channels are modeled using proximity (nanobot to nanobot), proximity and ultrasonic communication (nanobot to a gateway), and standard IEEE 802.15.4 for BAN communication. In our simulation framework, we rely on ns-3 to model all the three independent communication channels to, for the first time, study the end-to-end communication performance from nanobots to a connected host system. We consider the system a fundamental basis for more advanced studies of such integrated and very heterogeneous communication systems.

References

  1. Ian F. Akyildiz, M. Pierobon, S. Balasubramaniam, and Y. Koucheryavy. 2015. The Internet of Bio-Nano Things. IEEE Communications Magazine (COMMAG) 53, 3 (March 2015), 32--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Min Chen, Sergio Gonzalez, Athanasios Vasilakos, Huasong Cao, and Victor C. Leung. 2011. Body Area Networks: A Survey. ACM/Springer Mobile Networks and Applications (MONET) 16, 2 (April 2011), 171--193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Falko Dressler and Stefan Fischer. 2015. Connecting In-Body Nano Communication with Body Area Networks: Challenges and Opportunities of the Internet of Nano Things. Elsevier Nano Communication Networks 6 (June 2015), 29--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Regine Geyer, Marc Stelzner, Florian Büther, and Sebastian Ebers. 2018. Blood-VoyagerS: Simulation of the Work Environment of Medical Nanobots. In 5th ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication (NANOCOM 2018). ACM, Reykjavík, Iceland, 5:1--5:6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Giuseppe Enrico Santagati, Tommaso Melodia, Laura Galluccio, and Sergio Palazzo. 2015. Medium Access Control and Rate Adaptation for Ultrasonic Intrabody Sensor Networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) 23, 4 (Aug. 2015), 1121--1134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A simulation framework for connecting in-body nano communication with out-of-body devices

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        NanoCom '20: Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication
        September 2020
        142 pages
        ISBN:9781450380836
        DOI:10.1145/3411295

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 October 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        NanoCom '20 Paper Acceptance Rate24of24submissions,100%Overall Acceptance Rate97of135submissions,72%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader