Athina Georgara
ABSTRACT
We initiate the study of a novel class of cooperative games, the Hedonic Utility Games (HUGs), that takes into consideration both hedonic and utility-related preferences. We first formally define HUGs, and show how to extend and apply existing stability solution concepts to them. Then, we put forward the novel Individually Rational - Individually Stable (IRIS) solution concept, developed specifically for HUGs, that characterizes the stability of coalition structures in such settings. In addition, we propose a natural, “trichotomous” hedonic preferences model; study certain HUGs’ properties in that model; and exploit it to characterize the feasibility of HUGs coalitions, and to obtain a probability bound for pruning the coalitional space, thus reducing the computational load of computing kernel-stable payoff configurations for IRIS partitions.
- KRZYSZTOF R. APT and ANDREAS WITZEL. 2009. A GENERIC APPROACH TO COALITION FORMATION. International Game Theory Review 11, 03 (2009), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219198909002352 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219198909002352Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Robert J. Aumann, Bazalel Peleg, and Paul Robinowitz. 1965. A Method for Computing the Kernel of n-Person Games. Mathematical Computation 19 (1965), 531–551.Google Scholar
- Haris Aziz, Felix Brandt, and Paul Harrenstein. 2014. Fractional Hedonic Games. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (Paris, France) (AAMAS ’14). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 5–12.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haris Aziz, Paul Harrenstein, Jérôme Lang, and Michael Wooldridge. 2016. Boolean Hedonic Games. In Fifteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR). 166–175.Google Scholar
- Haris Aziz, Rahul Savani, and Hervé Moulin. 2016. Hedonic Games. In Handbook of Computational Social Choice, Felix Brandt, Vincent Conitzer, Ulle Endriss, Jérôme Lang, and Ariel D.Editors Procaccia (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, 356–376.Google Scholar
- Coralio Ballester. 2004. NP-completeness in hedonic games. Games and Economic Behavior 49, 1 (2004), 1 – 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2003.10.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Filippo Bistaffa, Alessandro Farinelli, Georgios Chalkiadakis, and Sarvapali D. Ramchurn. 2017. A cooperative game-theoretic approach to the social ridesharing problem. Artificial Intelligence 246 (2017), 86 – 117.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anna Bogomolnaia and Matthew O. Jackson. 2002. The Stability of Hedonic Coalition Structures. Games and Economic Behavior 38, 2 (2002), 201 – 230.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Georgios Chalkiadakis, Edith Elkind, and Michael Wooldridge. 2011. Computational Aspects of Cooperative Game Theory (Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Inetlligence and Machine Learning)(1st ed.). Morgan & Claypool Publishers.Google Scholar
- Morton Davis and Michael Maschler. 1963. The kernel of a cooperative game. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 12, 3 (1963), 223–259.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacques H. Dréze and Jerald Greenberg. 1980. Hedonic Coalitions: Optimality and Stability. Econometrica 48, 4 (1980), 987–1003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gabriele Eichfelder. 2014. Numerical Procedures in Multiobjective Optimization with Variable Ordering Structures. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 162, 2 (01 Aug 2014), 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-013-0267-yGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Gabriele Eichfelder and Tobias Gerlach. 2016. Characterization of properly optimal elements with variable ordering structures. Optimization 65, 3 (2016), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331934.2015.1040793 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/02331934.2015.1040793Google ScholarCross Ref
- Athina Georgara, Dimitrios Troullinos, and Georgios Chalkiadakis. 2019. Extracting hidden preferences over partitions in hedonic cooperative games. In Proc. of the 12th Knowledge Science Engineering Management (KSEM 19).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tomasz P. Michalak, Andrew Dowell, Peter McBurney, and Michael Wooldridge. 2008. Optimal Coalition Structure Generation In Partition Function Games. 388–392. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-58603-891-5-388Google Scholar
- Michael Mitzenmacher and Eli Upfal. 2005. Probability and Computing: Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Dominik Peters. 2016. Complexity of Hedonic Games with Dichotomous Preferences. In AAAI.Google Scholar
- David Schmeidler. 1969. The Nucleolus of a Characteristic Function Game. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 17, 6 (1969), 1163–1170.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Onn Shehory and Sarit Kraus. 1999. Feasible Formation of Coalitions Among Autonomous Agents in Non-Super-Additive Environments.Google Scholar
- Jakub Sliwinski and Yair Zick. 2017. Learning Hedonic Games. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-17. 2730–2736.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard E. Stearns. 1968. Convergent Transfer Schemes for N-Person Games. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 134, 3 (1968), 449–459.Google Scholar
- J. Zhao. 1991. The equilibria of a multiple objective game. International Journal of Game Theory 20, 2 (01 Jun 1991), 171–182.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Fractional Hedonic Games
The work we present in this article initiated the formal study of fractional hedonic games (FHGs), coalition formation games in which the utility of a player is the average value he ascribes to the members of his coalition. Among other settings, this ...
Altruistic Hedonic Games
AAMAS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent SystemsHedonic games are coalition formation games in which players have preferences over the coalitions they can join. All models of representing hedonic games studied so far are based upon selfish players only. Among the known ways of representing hedonic ...
Preferred coalitions in cooperative differential games
There are many interesting situations which can be described by anN-person general-sum differential game. Such games are characterized by the fact that the strategy of each player depends upon reasonable assumptions about the strategies of the remaining ...
Comments