skip to main content
10.1145/3411408.3411435acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessetnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Explainable Fully Connected Visual Words for the Classification of Skin Cancer Confocal Images: Interpreting the influence of visual words in classifying benign vs malignant pattern

Published: 02 September 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Skin cancer is affecting the lives of million people worldwide. Early detection and treatment of the cause can reduce drastically morbidity. Although the main workflow in dermatology clinics includes invasive skin removal procedures for diagnostic purposes, Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM) provides an ancillary, non-invasive methodology for reviewing areas of interest of the human skin at a high resolution. In this paper, we propose a method for the classification and the interpretation of visual patterns in skin cancer confocal images. Both tasks are based on the formation of a visual vocabulary from Speeded up Robust Features (SURF) and the utilization of simple shallow artificial neural network with fully connected layers. Interpretability of the predictive models is also quite important, since it improves their reliability, accountability, transparency and provides useful insight of how to evolve the predictive model towards better performance. The paper discusses the technical details of both approaches along with some initial results.

References

[1]
Vihendra Sehgal, Kingshuk. Chatterjee, Deepika Pandhi and Ananta Khurana, 2014. Basal Cell Carcinoma: Pathophysiology SKINmed 12, 3 (May 2014), 176-181.
[2]
Frank F Gellrich, S. Hüning, S. Beissert, Thomas K Eigentler, Eggert Stockfleth, R. Gutzmer and F. Meier, 2019. Medical treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous‐cell carcinoma Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 33, S8 (December 2019), 38-43.
[3]
Maria Kostaki, M Plaka, A Stergiopoulou, Katerina Kypreou, V Chardalia, V Chasapi, D Polydorou and Alexandros Stratigos, 2019. Trends in epidemiology of melanoma in situ in Greece: data from a melanoma reference center during the period 2000-2018 British Journal of Dermatology 183, 3 (March 2020), 811-813.
[4]
Cancer Facts and Figures 2019, American Cancer Society, https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2019.html. Accessed January 14, 2019.
[5]
Cancer Facts and Figures 2008, American Cancer Society, https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2008/cancer-facts-and-figures-2008.pdf,Accessed May 3, 2018.
[6]
Aaron S Farberg and Darrell S Rigel, 2017. The Importance of Early Recognition of Skin Cancer2018 Dermatologic Clinics 35, 4 (August 2017), 15-16.
[7]
Marek Wodzinski, Andrzej Skalski, Alexander Witkowski, Giovanni Pellacani and Joanna Ludzik, 2019. Convolutional Neural Network Approach to Classify Skin Lesions Using Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, Vol. 2019 (Jul 2019), 4754-4757.
[8]
Marc Combalia, Javiera Pérez-Anker, Adriana García-Herrera, Llucia Alos, Veronica Vilaplana, Ferran Marqués, Susana Puig and Joseph Malvehy, 2019. Digitally Stained Confocal Microscopy through Deep Learning Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning PMLR 102 (Jun 2019), 121-129.
[9]
Loris Nanni, Sheryl Brahnam, Stefano Ghidoni and Alessandra Lumini, 2018. Bioimage Classification with Handcrafted and Learned Features. In IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 16, 3 (May-Jun 2019), 874-885.
[10]
Francois Chollet, 2015. Keras. Github. Retrieved from https://github.com/fchollet/keras.
[11]
Martin Abadi, Paul Barham, Jianmin Chen, Zhifeng Chen, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, Matthieu Devin, 2016. Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. In 12th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation 16 (Nov 2016), 265-283.
[12]
Adam Gibson, Chris Nicholson, Josh Patterson, Melanie Warrick, D. BlackAlex, Vyacheslav Kokorin, Audet Samuel and Ebeler Susan, 2016. Deeplearning4j: Distributed, open-source deep learning for Java and Scala on Hadoop and Spark. figshare Software.
[13]
Herbert Bay, Tinne Tuytelaars and Van G Luc, 2006. Speeded Up Robust Features Computer Vision and Image Understanding 110, 3 (Jan 2006), 346-359.
[14]
Robert Martin Haralick, 1979. Statistical and structural approaches to texture Proceedings of the IEEE 67, 5 (Jun 1979), 786-804.
[15]
Karel Zuiderveld, 1994. Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization.In Graphics Gems IV, Academic Press.
[16]
Antoni Buades, Bartomeu Coll and Jean-Michel Morel, 2011. Non-Local Means Denoising Image Processing Online 1, (Sep 2011), 208-212.
[17]
William Murdoch, Chandan Singh, Karl Kumbier, Reza Abasi Asl and Bin Yu, 2019. Definitions, Methods, and Applications in Interpretable Machine Learning Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 44, (Oct 2019), 22071-22080.
[18]
Cynthia Rudin, 2019. Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead Nat Mach Intell 1, (May 2019), 206–215.
[19]
Edmond Zhang and Michael Mayo, 2010. Improving Bag-of-Words model with spatial information International Conference Image and Vision Computing New Zealand, 1-8.
[20]
Peter J Rousseuw, 1987. Silhouettes: A Graphical Aid to the Interpretation and Validation of Cluster J. Comput. Appl. Math 20, 1 (Nov 1987), 53–65.
[21]
David Arthur, Sergei Vassilvitskii, 2007. k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding. In Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms (SODA’07). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 1027–1035.
[22]
Andrew McCallum, Kamal Nigam, Lile H Ungar, 2000. Efficient Clustering of High Dimensional Data Sets with Application to Reference Matching. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD’00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 169-178.
[23]
Athanasios Kallipolitis, Alexandros Stratigos, Alexios Zarras and Ilias Maglogiannis, 2020. Fully Connected Visual Words for the Classification of Skin Cancer Confocal Images. In Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications Volume 5, 853-858.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Review of the application of the most current sophisticated image processing methods for the skin cancer diagnostics purposesArchives of Dermatological Research10.1007/s00403-024-02828-1316:4Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Improving explainability results of convolutional neural networks in microscopy imagesNeural Computing and Applications10.1007/s00521-023-08452-w35:29(21535-21553)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Skin Lesion Classification Using Machine LearningInventive Computation and Information Technologies10.1007/978-981-19-7402-1_27(385-397)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SETN 2020: 11th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence
September 2020
249 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 September 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Bag of Visual Words
  2. Interpretability
  3. Reflectance Confocal Microscopy
  4. Skin Cancer

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Conference

SETN 2020

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Review of the application of the most current sophisticated image processing methods for the skin cancer diagnostics purposesArchives of Dermatological Research10.1007/s00403-024-02828-1316:4Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Improving explainability results of convolutional neural networks in microscopy imagesNeural Computing and Applications10.1007/s00521-023-08452-w35:29(21535-21553)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Skin Lesion Classification Using Machine LearningInventive Computation and Information Technologies10.1007/978-981-19-7402-1_27(385-397)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
  • (2022)Explainable computer vision analysis for embryo selection on blastocyst images2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)10.1109/BHI56158.2022.9926740(1-4)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2022
  • (2021)Evaluating Mental Patients Utilizing Video Analysis of Facial ExpressionsArtificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations. AIAI 2021 IFIP WG 12.5 International Workshops10.1007/978-3-030-79157-5_16(182-193)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media