skip to main content
10.1145/3411681.3411700acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicieiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Application of TED Talk Strategies in Freshmen Library Orientation Lecture

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 August 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Freshmen library orientation lecture (FLOL) can assist students to capitalize on the library's resources and services. FLOL faces a variety of problems, such as two- dimensional and unappealing teaching mode. To improve the quality of FLOL in Xiamen University library (China), this research employed TED talk's strategies (principles and skills), which include readers' demand as the main factor, and readers caring and library innovation as the theme to build an emotional bond between library and readers. The lecture was customized to fit the readers' needs. At the same time, the readers' needs were listed based on the KANO model. Lecture time was optimized with humorous teaching methods and several cases. Successful application of TED talk strategies in FLOL will attract students to the library, which is beneficial to university education.

References

  1. Waldman M. 2003. Freshmen's use of library electronic resources ad self-efficacy. Information Research-an International Electronic Journal. 8(2): 20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dabbour K S. 1997. Applying active learning methods to the design of library instruction for a freshman seminar. College & Research Libraries. 58(4): 299--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Giles K. 2015. No Budget, No Experience, No Problem: Creating a Library Orientation Game for Freshman Engineering Majors. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2015, 41(2): 170--177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Marcus S, BECK S. 2003. A library adventure: Comparing a treasure hunt with a traditional freshman orientation tour. College & Research Libraries. 64(1): 23--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Patterson A. 2009. A needs analysis for information literacy provision for research: a case study in University College Dublin. Journal of Information Literacy. 3(1): 5--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bruce C. 2001. Interpreting the scope of their literature reviews: significant differences in research students' concerns. New Library World. 102(4/5): 158--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lorenzen M. 2008. Using outcome-based education in the planning and teaching of new information technologies. Journal of Library Administration. 26(3-4): 141--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. TIEFEL V M. 1995. Library user education: Examining its past, projecting its future. Library Trends. 44(2): 318--338.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lorenzen M. 1999. Active learning and library instruction. Illinois Libraries. 83(2): 19--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sugimoto, C. R., Thelwall, M., Larivière, V., Tsou, A., Mongeon, P., & Macaluso, B. 2013. Scientists popularizing science: characteristics and impact of TED talk presenters. PloS one. 8(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Anderson C. 2016. TED talks: The official TED guide to public speaking. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Xi, Q., Zhao, H., Hu, Y., Tong, Y., & Bao, P. 2018. Case studies and comparison between two models for assessing library service quality. Electronic Library. 36(6): 1099--1113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Zhang, Y. L., & Bi, R. F. 2017. Studying on enhancing readers' satisfaction model of electronic service quality in library based on LibQUAL+ and Kano. Procedia engineering, 174, 260--266.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kano, N. 1984. Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu (Quality, The Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control). 14, 39--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bailin, K. 2011. Changes in academic library space: A case study at the University of New South Wales. Australian Academic & Research Libraries. 42(4), 342--359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. DI CARLO G S. Humour in popularization: Analysis of humour-related laughter in TED talks[J]. The European Journal of Humour Research, 2014b, 1(4): 81--93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. di Carlo, G. S. 2014. Humour in popularization: Analysis of humour-related laughter in TED talks. The European Journal of Humour Research. 1(4), 81--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. IFLA.2016. Tuan Time - Each library experience is amemorable treasure - Xiamen University Libraries - China. Avaialble at: https://www.rsl.ru/photo/!_ORS/Enver/ifla/ifla-biblibre-marketing-award-2016[1].pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Starr, S. 2013. Creating brand love for libraries: can we be a kind of paradise. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 101(3), 168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Broadaway, R. 2012. Content-based instruction using Moodle: Teaching with TED talks. JALT CALL Journal. 8(3), 211--231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. DaVia Rubenstein, L. 2012. Using TED talks to inspire thoughtful practice. The teacher educator. 47(4), 261--267.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Loya, M. A., & Klemm, T. 2016. Teaching note---using TED Talks in the social work classroom: Encouraging student engagement and discourse. Journal of Social Work Education. 52(4), 518--523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The Application of TED Talk Strategies in Freshmen Library Orientation Lecture

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICIEI '20: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information and Education Innovations
      July 2020
      140 pages
      ISBN:9781450375757
      DOI:10.1145/3411681

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 August 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader