skip to main content
10.1145/3411763.3441350acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Workshop on Technologies to Support Critical Thinking in an Age of Misinformation

Published:08 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Serious concerns have been raised about social media’s and online news outlets’ contribution to a pandemic of misinformation. The sheer volume and tendency of misinformation to exploit people’s cognitive biases have eroded the public’s trust in media outlets, governmental institutions, and the democratic process. With Human-Computer Interaction being at the forefront of designing and developing user-facing computing systems, we bear special opportunities to address these issues and work on solutions to mitigate problems arising from misinformation. This workshop brings together designers, developers, and thinkers across disciplines to redefine computing systems by focusing on technologies and applications that instil and nurture critical thinking in their users. By focusing on the problem of misinformation and users’ cognitive security, this workshop will sketch out blueprints for systems and interfaces that contribute to advancing technology and media literacy, building critical thinking skills, and helping users telling fake from truth.

References

  1. Roberto O. Andrade and Sang Guun Yoo. 2019. Cognitive security: A comprehensive study of cognitive science in cybersecurity. Journal of Information Security and Applications 48, August 2019(2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2019.06.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Sarah Clinch, Tilman Dingler, Kai Kunze, Passant ElAgroudy, and Tsutomu Terada. 2017. WAHM - 4th Workshop on Ubiquitous Technologies to Augment the Human Mind: Sharing Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Maui, Hawaii) (UbiComp ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 662–665. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123024.3124459Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. John Cook, Peter Ellerton, and David Kinkead. 2018. Deconstructing climate misinformation to identify reasoning errors. Environmental Research Letters 13, 2 (2018), 024018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Tilman Dingler, Kai Kunze, Nigel Davies, Albrecht Schmidt, Marc Langheinrich, and Niels Henze. 2014. WAHM 2014: workshop on ubiquitous technologies for augmenting the human mind. In 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp 2014. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 1339–1345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Tilman Dingler, Kai Kunze, Evangelos Niforatos, Cathal Gurrin, Ioannis Giannopolos, Andreas Dengel, and Koichi Kise. 2016. WAHM 2016: 3rd Workshop on Ubiquitous Technologies for Augmenting the Human Mind. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (Heidelberg, Germany) (UbiComp ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1010–1013. https://doi.org/10.1145/2968219.2968570Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Tilman Dingler, Benjamin Tag, Evangelos Karapanos, Koichi Kise, and Andreas Dengel. 2020. Workshop on Detection and Design for Cognitive Biases in People and Computing Systems. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375159Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Katherine Levine Einstein and David M Glick. 2015. Do I think BLS data are BS? The consequences of conspiracy theories. Political Behavior 37, 3 (2015), 679–701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ben Farmer. 2020. Toxic alcohol kills more than 700 in Iran following false reports it wards off coronavirus. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/toxic-alcohol-kills-700-iran-following-false-reports-ward-coronavirus/ Last Visited: (June 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Leon Festinger. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Vol. 2. Stanford university press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kai Kunze, Tilman Dingler, Niels Henze, Koichi Kise, and Yoichi Sato. 2015. 2nd Workshop on Ubiquitous Technologies to Augment the Human Mind: Towards the Knowledge Log. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Osaka, Japan) (UbiComp/ISWC’15 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1145/2800835.2808718Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. David MJ Lazer, Matthew A Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J Berinsky, Kelly M Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J Metzger, Brendan Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, 2018. The science of fake news. Science 359, 6380 (2018), 1094–1096.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich KH Ecker, and John Cook. 2017. Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of applied research in memory and cognition 6, 4 (2017), 353–369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, and John Cook. 2012. Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13, 3 (2012), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018 PMID: 26173286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. W. J. McGuire and D. Papageorgis. 1961. The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62, 2 (1961), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042026Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler. 2010. When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior 32, 2 (2010), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hannah Rashkin, Eunsol Choi, Jin Yea Jang, Svitlana Volkova, and Yejin Choi. 2017. Truth of varying shades: Analyzing language in fake news and political fact-checking. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2931–2937.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Benjamin Tag, Christian Holz, Paul Lukowicz, Olivier Augereau, Yuji Uema, and Kai Kunze. 2018. EyeWear 2018: Second Workshop on EyeWear Computing. Proceedings of the 2018 {ACM} International Joint Conference and 2018 International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Wearable Computers, UbiComp/ISWC 2018 Adjunct, Singapore, October 08-12, 2018 (2018), 964–967. https://doi.org/10.1145/3267305.3274140Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Benjamin Tag, Jamie A. Ward, Yuji Uema, and Kai Kunze. 2019. Eyewear 2019: Third workshop on eyewear computing - FOcUs: Social interactions. UbiComp/ISWC 2019- - Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (2019), 616–618. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341162.3347761Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sander Van der Linden, Anthony Leiserowitz, Seth Rosenthal, and Edward Maibach. 2017. Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges 1, 2 (2017), 1600008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. J. Wakefield, S. H. Murch, A. Anthony, J. Linnell, D. M. Casson, M. Malik, M. Berelowitz, A. P. Dhillon, M. A. Thomson, P. Harvey, A. Valentine, S. E. Davies, and J. A. Walker-Smith. 1998. Retracted: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 351, 9103 (1998), 637–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11096-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. R S Wyer. 1974. Cognitive Organization and Change: An Information Processing Approach. L. Erlbaum Associates. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=HrttgTrS-jQCGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Workshop on Technologies to Support Critical Thinking in an Age of Misinformation
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2021
      2965 pages
      ISBN:9781450380959
      DOI:10.1145/3411763

      Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 May 2021

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format