skip to main content
10.1145/3411763.3451702acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Toward a Unified Framework for Visualization Design Guidelines

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Visualizations are now widely adopted across disciplines, providing effective means to understand and communicate data. However, people still frequently create misleading visualizations that distort the underlying data and ultimately misinform the audience. While design guidelines exist, they are currently scattered across different sources and devised by different people, often missing design trade-offs in different contexts and providing inconsistent and conflicting design knowledge to visualization practitioners. Our goal in this work is to investigate the ontology of visualization design guidelines and derive a unified framework for structuring the guidelines. We collected existing guidelines on the web and analyzed them using the grounded theory approach. We describe the current landscape of the available guidelines and propose a structured template for describing visualization design guidelines.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Accessed: February 25, 2021. Data To Viz. https://www.data-to-viz.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Accessed: February 25, 2021. The Data Visualisation Catalogue. https://datavizcatalogue.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Accessed: February 25, 2021. Data Viz Project. https://datavizproject.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Accessed: February 25, 2021. DataJournalism.com. https://datajournalism.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Accessed: February 25, 2021. Datawrapper. https://www.datawrapper.de/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Accessed: February 25, 2021. Financial Times Visual Vocabulary. https://ft-interactive.github.io/visual-vocabulary/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Accessed: February 25, 2021. Perceptual Edge. https://www.perceptualedge.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Basak Alper, Nathalie Henry Riche, Fanny Chevalier, Jeremy Boy, and Metin Sezgin. 2017. Visualization literacy at elementary school. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5485–5497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Saleema Amershi, Dan Weld, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Adam Fourney, Besmira Nushi, Penny Collisson, Jina Suh, Shamsi Iqbal, Paul N Bennett, Kori Inkpen, 2019. Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Katy Börner, Andreas Bueckle, and Michael Ginda. 2019. Data visualization literacy: Definitions, conceptual frameworks, exercises, and assessments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 6 (2019), 1857–1864.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jeremy Boy, Ronald A Rensink, Enrico Bertini, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2014. A principled way of assessing visualization literacy. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 20, 12(2014), 1963–1972.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Matthew Brehmer and Tamara Munzner. 2013. A multi-level typology of abstract visualization tasks. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 19, 12(2013), 2376–2385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kathy Charmaz and Linda Liska Belgrave. 2007. Grounded theory. The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology(2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. William S Cleveland and Robert McGill. 1984. Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American statistical association 79, 387(1984), 531–554.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Alexandra Diehl, Alfie Abdul-Rahman, Mennatallah El-Assady, Benjamin Bach, Daniel A Keim, and Min Chen. 2018. VisGuides: A Forum for Discussing Visualization Guidelines. In EuroVis (Short Papers). 61–65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Barney G Glaser and Anselm L Strauss. 2010. Grounded theory: strategien qualitativer forschung. Huber.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Leo A Goodman. 1961. Snowball sampling. The annals of mathematical statistics(1961), 148–170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeffrey Heer and Michael Bostock. 2010. Crowdsourcing graphical perception: using mechanical turk to assess visualization design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 203–212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Younghoon Kim and Jeffrey Heer. 2018. Assessing effects of task and data distribution on the effectiveness of visual encodings. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 37. Wiley Online Library, 157–167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sukwon Lee, Sung-Hee Kim, and Bum Chul Kwon. 2016. Vlat: Development of a visualization literacy assessment test. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 23, 1(2016), 551–560.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Miriah Meyer, Michael Sedlmair, P Samuel Quinan, and Tamara Munzner. 2015. The nested blocks and guidelines model. Information Visualization 14, 3 (2015), 234–249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Tamara Munzner. 2014. Visualization analysis and design. CRC press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Bahador Saket, Alex Endert, and Çağatay Demiralp. 2018. Task-based effectiveness of basic visualizations. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 25, 7(2018), 2505–2512.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. James Scott-Brown. 2018. Presenting Visualization Guideline Collections. 2nd IEEE VIS 2018 Workshop on the Creation, Curation, Critique and Conditioning of Principles and Guidelines in Visualization (2018). https://c4pgv.dbvis.de/Scott-Brown_2018.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Zezhong Wang, Lovisa Sundin, Dave Murray-Rust, and Benjamin Bach. 2020. Cheat sheets for data visualization techniques. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Toward a Unified Framework for Visualization Design Guidelines
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2021
      2965 pages
      ISBN:9781450380959
      DOI:10.1145/3411763

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 May 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format