skip to main content
10.1145/3411763.3451707acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Evaluating an Itinerary Recommendation Algorithm for Runners

Published:08 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recommender systems for runners primarily rely on existing running traces in an area. In the absence of running traces, recommending running routes is challenging. This paper describes our approach to generating and proposing ”pleasant” running tours that consider the runner’s standard preferences and their distance and elevation constraints. Our algorithm is an approach to solve the cold start recommendation problem in unknown places by mining available map-data. We implemented a prototypical smartphone app that generates and recommends pleasant running routes to evaluate our algorithm’s effectiveness. An in-the-wild user study was conducted, with 11 participants across three cities. We tested the correlation between what is defined as ”pleasant path” by our algorithm and the user’s perception. The results of the user study show a positive correlation and support our algorithm. We also outline implications for the design of successful recommendation algorithms for runners.

References

  1. Gediminas Adomavicius, Nikos Manouselis, and YoungOk Kwon. 2011. Multi-Criteria Recommender Systems. Springer US, Boston, MA.769–803 pages. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_24Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Syunsuke Bamba. 2012. Tour route generating device, tour route generating method, and program. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20120136566A1/en#patentCitationsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Amanda Brooks. 2006. Route based on distance. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20060206258A1/enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Danilo Gallo, Shreepriya Shreepriya, and Jutta Willamowski. 2020. RunAhead: Exploring Head Scanning based Navigation for Runners. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu, Hawai, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376828Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Strava Inc. 2021. Strava. Strava. https://blog.strava.com/routes/Accessed: 2021-02-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Benedikt Loepp and Jürgen Ziegler. 2018. Recommending Running Routes: Framework and Demonstrator. In Proceedings of the 2nd Second Workshop on Recommendation in Complex Scenarios (ComplexRec ’18). RecSys, Vancouver, 26–29. http://toinebogers.com/workshops/complexrec2018/resources/proceedings.pdf#page=26Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Garmin Ltd.2021. Creating a Course in Garmin Connect | Garmin Support. Garmin. https://support.garmin.com/en-US/?faq=tWx3JQyjlU474jqa91EJs8Accessed: 2021-02-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. David K. McGookin and Stephen A. Brewster. 2013. Investigating and supporting undirected navigation for runners. In CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems on - CHI EA ’13. ACM Press, Paris, France, 1395. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468605Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Damien Mercier. 2016. PleasantTourFinder : an application to find the most pleasant tour from a given location. https://core.ac.uk/display/161329299Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sofia Michel, Stephane Clinchant, Christophe Legras, and Jutta Willamowski. 2020. System and method for generating pedestrian tours. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20200309545A1/en/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. World Health Organisation. 2021. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) – World Health Organization. World Health Organisation. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019Accessed: 2021-02-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mathew Schwartz. 2020. Evaluating Jogging Routes in Mass Models. In SimAUD ’20: Simulation in Architecture and Urban Design. ACM, Virtual Event, 00–00.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shreepriya Shreepriya, Jutta Willamowski, and Danilo Gallo. 2019. Supporting Natural Navigation for Running in Unknown Places. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3323895Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Iwan Van Hende and Tao-Yuan Hsien. 2012. US 20130304377A1 - Method of creating varied exercise routes for a user | RPX Insight. https://insight.rpxcorp.com/patent/US20130304377A1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jutta Willamowski, Stephane Clinchant, Christophe Legras, Sofia Michel, and Shreepriya Shreepriya. 2019. Running Tour Generation for Unknown Environments. In HCI International 2019 - Posters, Constantine Stephanidis (Ed.). Vol. 1033. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 528–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23528-4_72 Series Title: Communications in Computer and Information Science.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating an Itinerary Recommendation Algorithm for Runners
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 2021
          2965 pages
          ISBN:9781450380959
          DOI:10.1145/3411763

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 May 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format