skip to main content
10.1145/3411763.3451736acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

More than Shared Ethnicity: Shared Identity’s Role in Transnational Newcomers’ Trust in Local Consumer-to-Consumer E-commerce

Published:08 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Transnational newcomers, i.e., foreign-born populations who move to a new country, rely on consumer-to-consumer electronic commerce (C2C e-commerce) to access local resources for adaptation. However, with low trust among transnational newcomers who enter a new country, they often face difficulties in the adaptation process, and little is known about which determinants affect their trust in C2C e-commerce. Because social identity is often complicated in transnational newcomers’ adaptation process, our work focuses on unpacking shared identity, a key trust antecedent in C2C e-commerce. We interviewed 12 transnational newcomers in the United States to identify the determinants of their shared identity in C2C e-commerce. Our preliminary results suggest that shared identity determinants include geographic proximity, ethnic background, life stage, and socio-economic status. We also uncovered ways that shared identity determinants influence transnational newcomers’ trust in local C2C e-commerce. Our work contributes two research implications to future studies on transnational newcomers’ technology use.

References

  1. Deana Brown and Rebecca E Grinter. 2014. Aboard abroad: Supporting transnational parent-school communication in migration-separated families. Information Technologies & International Development 10, 2(2014), 49–62. https://www.itidjournal.org/index.php/itid/article/view/1216Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lisa Catanzarite. 2000. Brown-collar jobs: occupational segregation and earnings of recent-immigrant Latinos. Sociological Perspectives 43, 1 (Mar. 2000), 45–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389782Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Xusen Cheng, Yu Gu, and Jia Shen. 2019. An integrated view of particularized trust in social commerce: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management 45 (Apr. 2019), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Alexander Cho, Roxana G. Herrera, Luis Chaidez, and Adilene Uriostegui. 2019. The “Comadre” project: An asset-based design approach to connecting low-income Latinx families to out-of-school learning opportunities. In Proc. of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300837Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Rianne Dekker and Godfried Engbersen. 2013. How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. Global Networks 4, 2014 (2013), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12040Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Peter Thisted Dinesen. 2012. Does generalized (Dis)Trust travel? Examining the impact of cultural heritage and destination-country environment on trust of immigrants. Political Psychology 33, 4 (Aug. 2012), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00886.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Peter Thisted Dinesen and Marc Hooghe. 2010. When in Rome, do as the Romans Do: The acculturation of generalized trust among immigrants in Western Europe. International Migration Review 44, 3 (Sep 2010), 697–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2010.00822.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bryan Dosono and Bryan Semaan. 2019. Moderation practices as emotional labor in sustaining online communities: The case of AAPI identity work on Reddit. In Proc. of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300372Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. James R. Elliott. 2001. Referral hiring and ethnically homogeneous jobs: How prevalent Is the connection and for whom?Social Science Research 30, 3 (Sep. 2001), 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1006/SSRE.2001.0704Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bora Erdem. 2018. How can social media Be helpful for immigrants to integrate society in the US. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies 3, 8 (2018), 74 – 79. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v3i3.p74-79Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Rosta Farzan, Grace Ahmed, Yvette Espinoza, Natalie Euley, and Marissa Villarreal. 2017. Welcome new Americans! Investigating the role of hyper-local online communities in integration of immigrants. In iConference 2017 Proceedings, Vol. 2. iSchools, University of Illinois, 99 – 106. https://doi.org/10.9776/17205Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Tamy Guberek, Allison McDonald, Sylvia Simioni, Abraham H. Mhaidli, Kentaro Toyama, and Florian Schaub. 2018. Keeping a low profile? Technology, risk and privacy among undocumented immigrants. In Proc. of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173688Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Oliver L. Haimson, Bryan Semaan, Brianna Dym, Joey Chiao-Yin Hsiao, Daniel Herron, and Wendy Moncur. 2019. Life transitions and social technologies: Research and design for times of life change. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(CSCW ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 480–486. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3359431Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Caroline Haythornthwaite. 2002. Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society 18, 5 (2002), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290108195Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Joey Chiao-Yin Hsiao. 2019. Fostering immigrants’ trust in online local social exchange. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(CSCW ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3361854Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Joey Chiao-Yin Hsiao and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2018. Technology to support immigrant access to social capital and adaptation to a new country. Proc. of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW(2018), Article 70. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274339Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. In Jeong Hwang, Bong Gyou Lee, and Ki Youn Kim. 2014. Information asymmetry, social networking site word of mouth, and mobility effects on social commerce in Korea. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 17, 2 (Feb. 2014), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0566Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sanghyun Kim and Hyunsun Park. 2013. Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. International Journal of Information Management 33, 2 (Apr. 2013), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.11.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Dawn Kingston, Maureen Heaman, Beverley Chalmers, Janusz Kaczorowski, Beverley O’Brien, Lily Lee, Susie Dzakpasu, and Patricia O’Campo. 2011. Comparison of maternity experiences of Canadian-born and recent and non-recent immigrant women: findings from the Canadian maternity experiences survey. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 33, 11 (Nov. 2011), 1105–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35078-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Lee Komito. 2011. Social media and migration: Virtual community 2.0. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62, 6 (Jun. 2011), 1075–1086. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21517Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Airi Lampinen, Kai Huotari, and Coye Cheshire. 2015. Challenges to participation in the sharing economy: The case of local online peer-to-peer exchange in a single parents’ network. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) 24 (May 2015), 16–32. https://doaj.org/article/ 9c054460e42f4ad18461d66ce38004abGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Xiaolin Lin, Xuequn Wang, and Nick Hajli. 2019. Building e-commerce satisfaction and boosting sales: The role of social commerce trust and its antecedents. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 23, 3 (Jul. 2019), 328–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2019.1619907Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Jessa Lingel, Mor Naaman, and danah boyd. 2014. City, self, network: ransnational migrants and online identity work. In Proc. of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1502–1510. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.25311693Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Yaobin Lu, Ling Zhao, and Bin Wang. 2010. From virtual community members to C2C e-commerce buyers: Trust in virtual communities and its effect on consumers’ purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 9, 4 (Jul. 2010), 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Carol Moser, Paul Resnick, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2017. Community commerce: facilitating trust in Mom-to-mom sale groups on Facebook. In Proc. of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 4344–4357. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025550Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tamanna Motahar, Mahmood Jasim, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, and Narges Mahyar. 2020. Exploring how international graduate students in the US Seek support. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383094Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Louise Ryan, Rosemary Sales, Mary Tilki, and Bernadetta Siara. 2008. Social networks, social support and social capital: The experiences of recent Polish migrants in London. Sociology 42, 4 (Aug. 2008), 672–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508091622Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Dina Sabie, Samar Sabie, and Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. 2020. Memory through design: supporting cultural identity for immigrants through a paper-based home drafting tool. In Proc. of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376636Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Johnny Saldaña. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE Publications Limited, Thousand Oaks, CA. USA. 223 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jari Salo and Heikki Karjaluoto. 2007. A conceptual model of trust in the online environment. Online Information Review 31, 5 (2007), 604–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520710832324Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Jimy Sanders, Victor Nee, and Scott Sernau. 2002. Asian Immigrants’ reliance on social ties in a multiethnic labor market. Social Forces 81, 1 (Sep. 2002), 281–314. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2002.0058Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Marisol Wong-Villacres, Neha Kumar, and Betsy DiSalvo. 2019. The parenting actor-network of Latino immigrants in the United States. In Proc. of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300914Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Marisol Wong-Villacres, Neha Kumar, and Betsy Disalvo. 2019. The work of bilingual parent-education liaisons: Assembling information patchworks for immigrant parents. Proc. of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359288Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. More than Shared Ethnicity: Shared Identity’s Role in Transnational Newcomers’ Trust in Local Consumer-to-Consumer E-commerce
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 2021
          2965 pages
          ISBN:9781450380959
          DOI:10.1145/3411763

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 May 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format