ABSTRACT
Synthesis, or the integration of hitherto separated elements, is a prominent concept in theories of design processes. Synthesis often happens when there is a need to make a decision, though it is often the result of a combination of different alternatives, instead of deciding in favor of one and eliminating another. In many design studies, synthesis has been investigated in the contexts of everyday design—bicycle frames, sewing machines, commercial architecture. We were interested in how it might apply in contexts of reflective design, whose pragmatics often depend on different interrelationships between users and technological products. In this paper, we argue that designing everyday use objects for reflection requires a synthesis of two apparently opposite forms: conventionally practical forms, since they are everyday use objects, and evocative forms, since they make users think. We provide two examples of everyday objects for reflection that we believe synthesize both conventionally practical and evocative forms, analyzing the design processes that led to these forms, and discussing how these reflective designs embody different forms of synthesis.
- Christopher Alexander. 1964. Notes on the Synthesis of Form(later pr. edition ed.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
- Christopher Alexander. 2002. The Process of Creating Life: Nature of Order, Book 2: An Essay on the Art of Building and the Nature of the Universe (1st edition ed.). Center for Environmental Structure, Berkeley, Calif.Google Scholar
- Christopher Alexander, Sara Ishikawa, Murray Silverstein, Max Jacobson, Ingrid Fiksdahl-King, and Shlomo Angel. 1977. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Arthur Aron, Elaine N. Aron, and Danny Smollan. 1992. Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63, 4(1992), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ernesto Arroyo, Leonardo Bonanni, and Ted Selker. 2005. Waterbot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 631–639. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055059Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mattias Arvola, Jeffrey Bardzell, Stefan Holmlid, and Jonas Löwgren. 2018. What we mean by interactive form. interactions 25, 4 (2018), 6–7. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-149589Google Scholar
- James Auger. 2013. Speculative design: crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity 24, 1 (March 2013), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.767276Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.767276.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Saskia Bakker, Elise Hoven, and Berry Eggen. 2015. Peripheral Interaction: Characteristics and Considerations. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 19, 1 (Jan. 2015), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0775-2Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeffrey Bardzell. 2009. Interaction criticism and aesthetics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2357–2366. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1519063Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeffrey Bardzell. 2011. Interaction criticism: An introduction to the practice. Interacting with Computers 23, 6 (Nov. 2011), 604–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.07.001Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2015. Immodest Proposals: Research Through Design and Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2093–2102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702400Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Erik Stolterman. 2014. Reading Critical Designs: Supporting Reasoned Interpretations of Critical Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1951–1960. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557137Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1301–1310. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eli Blevis. 2007. Sustainable Interaction Design: Invention & Disposal, Renewal & Reuse. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240705event-place: San Jose, California, USA.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carl DiSalvo. 2012. Adversarial Design. The MIT Press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming (1st edition ed.). The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts ; London.Google Scholar
- Gabriele Ferri, Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Stephanie Louraine. 2014. Analyzing Critical Designs: Categories, Distinctions, and Canons of Exemplars. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems(DIS ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598588Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jodi Forlizzi, Ilpo Koskinen, Paul Hekkert, and John Zimmerman. 2017. Let’s get divorced: Pragmatic and critical constructive design.Google Scholar
- Christopher Frayling. 1993. Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Arts Research Papers 1, 1 (1993), 1–5.Google Scholar
- Jon Froehlich, Leah Findlater, and James Landay. 2010. The Design of Eco-feedback Technology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1999–2008. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753629Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jon Froehlich, Leah Findlater, Marilyn Ostergren, Solai Ramanathan, Josh Peterson, Inness Wragg, Eric Larson, Fabia Fu, Mazhengmin Bai, Shwetak Patel, and James A. Landay. 2012. The design and evaluation of prototype eco-feedback displays for fixture-level water usage data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2367–2376. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208397Google ScholarDigital Library
- William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, Austin, Texas, USA, 937–946. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maliheh Ghajargar. 2018. Designing Tools for Reflection: a concept-driven approach. (March 2018). https://doi.org/10.6092/polito/porto/2702550Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maliheh Ghajargar and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2019. Synthesizing Opposites: Technical Rationality and Pragmatism in Design. The Design Journal 22, sup1 (April 2019), 2031–2044. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1594927Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1594927.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maliheh Ghajargar, Mikael Wiberg, and Erik Stolterman. 2018. Designing IoT Systems that Support Reflective Thinking: A Relational Approach. International Journal of Design 12, 1 (2018), 21–35.Google Scholar
- James Gibson. 2014. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Routledge, New York, London.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pauline Gourlet, Louis Eveillard, and Ferdinand Dervieux. 2016. The Research Diary, Supporting Pupils’ Reflective Thinking During Design Activities. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children(IDC ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930702Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shad Gross, Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Michael Stallings. 2017. Persuasive Anxiety: Designing and Deploying Material and Formal Explorations of Personal Tracking Devices. Human–Computer Interaction 32, 5-6 (Nov. 2017), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1287570Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lars Hallnäs and Johan Redström. 2001. Slow Technology – Designing for Reflection. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 5, 3 (Jan. 2001), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00000019Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leonie Hannan and Sarah Longair. 2017. History through material culture. Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
- John Chris Jones. 1992. Design Methods (2 edition ed.). Wiley, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Klaus Krippendorff. 2005. The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design (1 edition ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
- Susanne Lajoie. 2000. Computers As Cognitive Tools: No More Walls (2nd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
- Eva Lenz, Sarah Diefenbach, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2013. Exploring Relationships Between Interaction Attributes and Experience. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces(DPPI ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1145/2513506.2513520event-place: Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ian Li, Anind K. Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2011. Understanding My Data, Myself: Supporting Self-reflection with Ubicomp Technologies. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing(UbiComp ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1145/2030112.2030166Google ScholarDigital Library
- Youn-kyung Lim, Erik Stolterman, Heekyoung Jung, and Justin Donaldson. 2007. Interaction Gestalt and the Design of Aesthetic Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces(DPPI ’07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1145/1314161.1314183Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonas Löwgren. 2009. Toward an Articulation of Interaction Esthetics. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia 15, 2 (2009), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614560903117822Google ScholarDigital Library
- John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2007. Technology As Experience. The MIT Press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wim Miller. 2001. ORDER AND MEANING IN DESIGN. Purdue University Press, Utrecht.Google Scholar
- Bonnie A. Nardi. 1996. Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human–computer interaction. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, US, 69–102.Google Scholar
- Harold G. Nelson and Erik Stolterman. 2012. The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Don Norman. 2005. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things (1 edition ed.). Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
- Don Norman. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition (revised, expanded edition ed.). Basic Books, New York, New York.Google Scholar
- Seymour A. Papert. 1993. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, And Powerful Ideas (2 edition ed.). Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
- Roy D. Pea. 1985. Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist 20, 4 (1985), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2004_2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marianne Graves Petersen, Ole Sejer Iversen, Peter Gall Krogh, and Martin Ludvigsen. 2004. Aesthetic Interaction: A Pragmatist’s Aesthetics of Interactive Systems. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques(DIS ’04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013153event-place: Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nikolaus Pevsner. 1991. Pioneers of Modern Design: From William Morris to Walter Gropius (new ed editioned.). Penguin, London.Google Scholar
- Bernd Ploderer, Wolfgang Reitberger, Harri Oinas-Kukkonen, and Julia van Gemert-Pijnen. 2014. Social interaction and reflection for behaviour change. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 7 (Oct. 2014), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0779-yGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Marcel Proust. 1934. Remembrance of Things Past, Volume 1(later printing edition ed.). Random House New York.Google Scholar
- David Raizman. 2004. A History of Modern Design : Graphics and Products Since the Industrial Revolution. Laurence King Pub, London.Google Scholar
- Devina Ramduny-Ellis, Alan Dix, Martyn Evans, Jo Hare, and Steve Gill. 2010. Physicality in Design: An Exploration. The Design Journal 13, 1 (March 2010), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.2752/146069210X12580336766365Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marco Rozendaal. 2016. Objects with Intent: A New Paradigm for Interaction Design. Interactions 23, 3 (April 2016), 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/2911330Google ScholarDigital Library
- Corina Sas and Alan Dix. 2009. Designing for Reflection on Experience. In CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4741–4744. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520730Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Wesley Schultz. 2002. Inclusion with nature: understanding human-nature interactions. In The psychology of sustainable development (2002 ed.). Kluwer, New York, 61–78.Google Scholar
- P. Wesley Schultz, Chris Shriver, Jennifer J. Tabanico, and Azar M. Khazian. 2004. Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24, 1 (2004), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7Google ScholarCross Ref
- Donald A. Schön. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner : How Professionals Think in Action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473Google ScholarCross Ref
- Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph ’Jofish’ Kaye. 2005. Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility(CC ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, Aarhus, Denmark, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094569Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gerda Smets, Kees Overbeeke, and William Gaver. 1994. Form-giving: Expressing the Nonobvious. In Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’94). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 204–. https://doi.org/10.1145/259963.260289Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erik Stolterman and Mikael Wiberg. 2010. Concept-Driven Interaction Design Research. Human–Computer Interaction 25, 2 (2010).Google Scholar
- César Tapia-Fonllem, Victor Corral-Verdugo, Blanca Fraijo-Sing, and Maria Fernanda Durón-Ramos. 2013. Assessing Sustainable Behavior and its Correlates: A Measure of Pro-Ecological, Frugal, Altruistic and Equitable Actions. Sustainability 5, 2 (Feb. 2013), 711–723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020711Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wen-Sheng Tzeng, Kuang-Ming Kuo, Paul C. Talley, Hsiu-Chin Chen, and Jhi-Joung Wang. 2015. Do ePortfolios Contribute to Learners’ Reflective Thinking Activities?: A Preliminary Study of Nursing Staff Users. J. Med. Syst. 39, 9 (Sept. 2015), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0281-8Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anna Vallgårda and Johan Redström. 2007. Computational Composites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240706Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anna Vallgårda, Morten Winther, Nina Mørch, and Edit E Vizer. 2015. Temporal Form in Interaction Design. International Journal of Design 9, 3 (2015), 15.Google Scholar
- Mark Weiser and John Seely Brown. 1997. The Coming Age of Calm Technology. In Beyond Calculation: The Next Fifty Years of Computing, Peter J. Denning and Robert M. Metcalfe (Eds.). Springer New York, New York, NY, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0685-9_6Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mikael Wiberg. 2018. The Materiality of Interaction: Notes on the Materials of Interaction Design (illustrated edition ed.). The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- Lu Xiao, Shawn Clark, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2008. Promoting Reflective Thinking in Collaborative Learning Activities. In Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies(ICALT ’08). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 709–711. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2008.280Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, San Jose, California, USA, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Synthesis of Forms: Integrating Practical and Reflective Qualities in Design
Recommendations
Layout-driven RTL binding techniques for high-level synthesis
ISSS '96: Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on System synthesisThe importance of effective and efficient accounting of layout effects is well-established in high-level synthesis (HLS), since it allows more realistic exploration of the design space and the generation of solutions with predictable metrics. This ...
An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach
DIS '10: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive SystemsThe field of HCI is experiencing a growing interest in Research through Design (RtD), a research approach that employs methods and processes from design practice as a legitimate method of inquiry. We are interested in expanding and formalizing this ...
What is the object of design?
CHI EA '12: CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn this paper we reflect upon design at a conceptual level, discussing how creativity can be coupled with participation and experience, dialoguing with philosophers and social theorists, and looking for the experiential grounds of our understanding of ...
Comments