skip to main content
10.1145/3411764.3445272acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

An Activity Theory Analysis of Search & Rescue Collective Sensemaking and Planning Practices

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Search and rescue (SAR), a disaster response activity performed to locate and save victims, primarily involves collective sensemaking and planning. SAR responders learn to search and navigate the environment, process information about buildings, and collaboratively plan with maps. We synthesize data from five sources, including field observations and interviews, to understand the informational components of SAR and how information is recorded and communicated. We apply activity theory, uncovering unforeseen factors that are relevant to the design of collaboration systems and training solutions. Through our analysis, we derive design implications to support collaborative information technology and training systems: mixing physical and digital mapping; mixing individual and collective mapping; building for different levels and sources of information; and building for different rules, roles, and activities.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Michael H. Agar. 1997. Ethnography: An Overview. Substance Use & Misuse 32, 9 (January 1997), 1155–1173. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826089709035470Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. R. N. Akram, K. Markantonakis, K. Mayes, O. Habachi, D. Sauveron, A. Steyven, and S. Chaumette. 2017. Security, privacy and safety evaluation of dynamic and static fleets of drones. In 2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2017.8101984Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. David S. Alberts, John J. Garstka, Richard E. Hayes, and David A. Signori. 2001. Understanding information age warfare. Technical Report. DTIC Document.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. David S. Alberts and Richard E. Hayes. 2006. Understanding command and control. Technical Report. DTIC Document.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. David S. Alberts and Richard E. Hayes. 2007. Planning: complex endeavors. Technical Report. DTIC Document.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Joelle Alcaidinho, Larry Freil, Taylor Kelly, Kayla Marland, Chunhui Wu, Bradley Wittenbrook, Giancarlo Valentin, and Melody Jackson. 2017. Mobile Collaboration for Human and Canine Police Explosive Detection Teams. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(CSCW ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 925–933. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998271Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sultan A. Alharthi, William A. Hamilton, Igor Dolgov, and Phoebe O. Toups Dugas. 2018. Mapping in the Wild: Toward Designing to Train Search & Rescue Planning. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(CSCW '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 137-140. https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3274039Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sultan A. Alharthi, Nick LaLone, Ahmed S. Khalaf, Ruth C. Torres, Lennart E. Nacke, Igor Dolgov, and Phoebe O. Toups Dugas. 2018. Practical Insights into the Design of Future Disaster Response Training Simulations. In Proc. 15th ISCRAM Conference. 818-830.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sultan A. Alharthi, Hitesh Nidhi Sharma, Sachin Sunka, Igor Dolgov, and Phoebe O. Toups Dugas. 2018. Designing Future Disaster Response Team Wearables from a Grounding in Practice. In Proceedings of Technology, Mind, and Society(TechMindSociety '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sultan A. Alharthi, Ruth C. Torres, Ahmed S. Khalaf, Phoebe O. Toups Dugas, Igor Dolgov, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2018. Investigating the Impact of Annotation Interfaces on Player Performance in Distributed Multiplayer Games. In Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Comp. Sys.(CHI '18). ACM, 314:1-314:13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jennings Anderson, Robert Soden, Brian Keegan, Leysia Palen, and Kenneth M. Anderson. 2018. The Crowd is the Territory: Assessing Quality in Peer-Produced Spatial Data During Disasters. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 34, 4(2018), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1427828Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. AZSARCA. 2018. Arizona Basic Search and Rescue Manual. Online. https://goo.gl/z5K6n4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jakob Bardram and Afsaneh Doryab. 2011. Activity Analysis: Applying Activity Theory to Analyze Complex Work in Hospitals. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958895Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jakob E. Bardram. 1997. Plans as Situated Action: An Activity Theory Approach to Workflow Systems. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7372-6_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gregory Z. Bedny. 2017. Application of Systemic-Structural Activity Theory to Design and Training (1st ed.). CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregory Z. Bedny, Waldemar Karwowski, and Inna Bedny. 2014. Applying Systemic-Structural Activity Theory to Design of Human-Computer Interaction Systems(1st ed.). CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Steve Benford, Andy Crabtree, Martin Flintham, Adam Drozd, Rob Anastasi, Mark Paxton, Nick Tandavanitj, Matt Adams, and Ju Row-Farr. 2006. Can you see me now?ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 13, 1(2006), 100–133. https://doi.org/10.1145/1143518.1143522Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Steve Benford and Gabriella Giannachi. 2011. Performing Mixed Reality. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nitesh Bharosa, JinKyu Lee, Marijn Janssen, and H. Raghav Rao. 2012. An activity theory analysis of boundary objects in cross-border information systems development for disaster management. Security Informatics 1, 1 (Oct 2012), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-8532-1-15Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. May Britt Bjerke and Ralph Renger. 2017. Being smart about writing SMART objectives. Evaluation and Program Planning 61 (2017), 125 – 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.12.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Staffan Björk, Sus Lundgren, and Jussi Holopainen. 2003. Game Design Patterns. In Level Up - Proceedings of Digital Games Research Conference 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Bryan L. Bonner, Michael R. Baumann, and Reeshad S. Dalal. 2002. The effects of member expertise on group decision-making and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 88, 2 (2002), 719 – 736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00010-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Elizabeth M. Bonsignore, Derek L. Hansen, Phoebe O. Toups Dugas, Lennart E. Nacke, Anastasia Salter, and Wayne Lutters. 2012. Mixed Reality Games. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion(CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7-8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2141512.2141517Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Anthony Browne. 1981. Hansel and Gretel. Walker Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jennifer L. Burke, Robin R. Murphy, Michael D. Coovert, and Dawn L. Riddle. 2004. Moonlight in Miami: Field Study of Human-Robot Interaction in the Context of an Urban Search and Rescue Disaster Response Training Exercise. Human–Computer Interaction 19, 1-2 (2004), 85–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2004.9667341Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. John M. Carroll. 2003. HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. J. Casper and R. R. Murphy. 2003. Human-robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade Center. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) 33, 3(2003), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2003.811794Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Carlos Castillo. 2016. Big Crisis Data: Social Media in Disasters and Time-Critical Situations (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Matthew Chalmers and Areti Galani. 2004. Seamful Interweaving: Heterogeneity in the Theory and Design of Interactive Systems. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques(DIS ’04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013149Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Matthew Chalmers and Ian Maccoll. 2003. Seamful and seamless design in ubiquitous computing. Technical Report. In Proceedings of Workshop At the Crossroads: The Interaction of HCI and Systems Issues in UbiComp. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Victoria Chang, Pramod Chundury, and Marshini Chetty. 2017. Spiders in the Sky: User Perceptions of Drones, Privacy, and Security. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6765–6776. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025632Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Rui Chen, Raj Sharman, H. Raghav Rao, and Shambhu J. Upadhyaya. 2013. Data Model Development for Fire Related Extreme Events: An Activity Theory Approach. MIS Q. 37, 1 (March 2013), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.06Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. H. Chenji, W. Zhang, M. Won, R. Stoleru, and C. Arnett. 2012. A wireless system for reducing response time in Urban Search Rescue. In 2012 IEEE 31st International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC). 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1109/PCCC.2012.6407756Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Herbert H. Clark. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Tamara Clegg, Leyla Norooz, Seokbin Kang, Virginia Byrne, Monica Katzen, Rafael Velez, Angelisa Plane, Vanessa Oguamanam, Thomas Outing, Jason Yip, Elizabeth Bonsignore, and Jon Froehlich. 2017. Live Physiological Sensing and Visualization Ecosystems: An Activity Theory Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2029–2041. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025987Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Gregorio Convertino, Helena M. Mentis, Aleksandra Slavkovic, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2011. Supporting Common Ground and Awareness in Emergency Management Planning: A Design Research Project. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18, 4 (Dec. 2011), 22:1–22:34. https://doi.org/10.1145/2063231.2063236Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Kelvin F. Cross and Richard L. Lynch. 1988. The “SMART” way to define and sustain success. National Productivity Review 8, 1 (1988), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/npr.4040080105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Richard L. Daft and Robert H. Lengel. 1984. Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design.Research in Organizational Behavior 6 (1984), 191–233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Shideh Dashti, Leysia Palen, Mehdi P. Heris, Kenneth M. Anderson, T. Jennings Anderson, and Scott Anderson. 2014. Supporting disaster reconnaissance with social media data: A design-oriented case study of the 2013 Colorado floods. In Proc. 11th ISCRAM Conference. 632–641.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. David Lovelock. 2015. Objectives, Strategies, and Tactics in Search and Rescue. Online. http://www.saraz.org/documents/Objectives.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Sebastian Denef and David Keyson. 2012. Talking About Implications for Design in Pattern Language. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2509–2518. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208418Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Sebastian Denef, Leonardo Ramirez, Tobias Dyrks, and Gunnar Stevens. 2008. Handy Navigation in Ever-changing Spaces: An Ethnographic Study of Firefighting Practices. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems(DIS ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394465Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Audrey Desjardins, Carman Neustaedter, Saul Greenberg, and Ron Wakkary. 2014. Collaboration Surrounding Beacon Use During Companion Avalanche Rescue. In Proc. 17th CSCW Conference(CSCW ’14). ACM, 877–887.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Igor Dolgov, Edin Sabic, and Bryan L. White. 2018. Activity theory as a framework for integrating UAS into the NAS: A field study of crew member activity during UAS operations near a non-towered airport.. In Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Mica R. Endsley. 1988. Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 32. SAGE Publications, 97–101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Mica R. Endsley. 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37, 1 (1995), 32–64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Mica R. Endsley. 2000. Theoretical Underpinnings of Situation Awareness: A Critical Review. In Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement, Mica R. Endsley and D. J. Garland (Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 3–6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Yrjö Engeström. 2000. Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics 43, 7 (2000), 960–974.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Yrjö Engeström, Reijo Miettinen, Raija-Leena Punamäki, 1999. Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. FEMA. 2003. National US&R Response System - Field Operations Guide. Online. https://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/usr/usr_23_20080205_rog.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. FEMA. 2005. Search and Rescue Resources Definitions Manual. Online. https://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nims/508-8_search_and_rescue_resources.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. FEMA. 2017. The National Incident Management System (NIMS) Documentation. Online. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1508151197225-ced8c60378c3936adb92c1a3ee6f6564/FINAL_NIMS_2017.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. FEMA US&R Structures Sub-Group and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers US&R Program Office. 2013. Urban Search & Rescue Shoring Operations Guide (3rd ed.). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Joel E. Fischer, Wenchao Jiang, Andruid Kerne, Chris Greenhalgh, Sarvapali Ramchurn, Steven Reece, Nadia Pantidi, and Tom Rodden. 2014. Supporting Team Coordination on the Ground: Requirements from a Mixed Reality Game. In COOP 2014 - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, Chiara Rossitto, Luigina Ciolfi, David Martin, and Bernard Conein (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06498-7_4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Joel E. Fischer, Stuart Reeves, Tom Rodden, Steve Reece, Sarvapali D. Ramchurn, and David Jones. 2015. Building a Birds Eye View: Collaborative Work in Disaster Response. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4103–4112. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702313Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Sahana Software Foundation. 2016. Sahana. http://sahanafoundation.org/. Accessed: 2016-04-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Marlena R. Fraune, Ahmed S. Khalaf, Mahlet Zemedie, Poom Pianpak, Zahra Namini Mianji, Sultan A. Alharthi, Igor Dolgov, Bill Hamilton, Son Tran, and Phoebe O. Toups Dugas. 2021. Developing Future Wearable Interfaces for Human-Drone Teams through a Virtual Drone Search Game. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 147 (2021), 102573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102573Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Patricia Fusch, Gene E. Fusch, and Lawrence R. Ness. 2018. Denzin’s paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Social Change 10, 1 (2018), 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Huiji Gao, Geoffrey Barbier, and Rebecca Goolsby. 2011. Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief. IEEE Intelligent Systems 26, 3 (2011), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2011.52Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. William W. Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity As a Resource for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642653Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Geri Gay and Helene Hembrooke. 2004. Activity-Centered Design: An Ecological Approach to Designing Smart Tools and Usable Systems. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Dedre Gentner and Albert L. Stevens. 1983. Mental Models. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Carl Gutwin and Saul Greenberg. 2002. A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 11, 3 (Sep 2002), 411–446. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021271517844Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Carl Gutwin, Saul Greenberg, and Mark Roseman. 1996. Workspace Awareness in Real-Time Distributed Groupware: Framework, Widgets, and Evaluation. Springer London, London, 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3588-3_18Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Christine A. Halverson. 2002. Activity Theory and Distributed Cognition: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories?Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 11, 1 (2002), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015298005381Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Casper Harteveld. 2012. Making Sense of Virtual Risks. Deltares Select Series, Vol. 11. IOS Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Jarrod C. Hodgson, Rowan Mott, Shane M. Baylis, Trung T. Pham, Simon Wotherspoon, Adam D. Kilpatrick, Ramesh Raja Segaran, Ian Reid, Aleks Terauds, and Lian Pin Koh. 2018. Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9, 5 (2018), 1160–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12974Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. James Hollan, Edwin Hutchins, and David Kirsh. 2000. Distributed Cognition: Toward a New Foundation for Human-computer Interaction Research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 2 (June 2000), 174–196. https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Amanda L. Hughes, Leysia Palen, Jeannette Sutton, Sophia B. Liu, and Sarah Vieweg. 2008. Site-seeing in disaster: An examination of on-line social convergence. In Proc. 5th ISCRAM Conference. 324–333.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Eva Jensen. 2007. Sensemaking in military planning: a methodological study of command teams. Cognition, Technology & Work 11, 2 (2007), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0084-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Xiaodong Jiang, Jason I. Hong, Leila A. Takayama, and James A. Landay. 2004. Ubiquitous computing for firefighters: Field studies and prototypes of large displays for incident command. In CHI ’04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985778Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Mark Powell Johnson. 2016. Evaluating the Utility of a Geographic Information Systems-Based Mobility Model in Search and Rescue Operations. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Southern California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Brennan Jones. 2018. Designing for Distributed Collaboration in Wilderness Search and Rescue. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(CSCW ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3272978Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Brennan Jones, Kody Dillman, Richard Tang, Anthony Tang, Ehud Sharlin, Lora Oehlberg, Carman Neustaedter, and Scott Bateman. 2016. Elevating Communication, Collaboration, and Shared Experiences in Mobile Video Through Drones. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems(DIS ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1123–1135. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901847Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Brennan Jones, Anthony Tang, and Carman Neustaedter. 2020. Remote Communication in Wilderness Search and Rescue: Implications for the Design of Emergency Distributed-Collaboration Tools for Network-Sparse Environments. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, GROUP (Jan. 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3375190Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Brennan Jones, Anthony Tang, Carman Neustaedter, Alissa N. Antle, and Elgin-Skye McLaren. 2018. Designing a Tangible Interface for Manager Awareness in Wilderness Search and Rescue. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(CSCW ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3274045Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Brennan Jones, Anthony Tang, Carman Neustaedter, Alissa N. Antle, and Elgin-Skye McLaren. 2020. Designing Technology for Shared Communication and Awareness in Wilderness Search and Rescue. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45289-6_9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Victor Kaptelinin and Bonnie Nardi. 2012. Activity Theory in HCI: Fundamentals and Reflections. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Victor Kaptelinin and Bonnie A. Nardi. 2006. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design (Acting with Technology). The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Akiyuki Kawasaki, Merrick Lex Berman, and Wendy Guan. 2013. The growing role of web-based geospatial technology in disaster response and support. Disasters 37, 2 (2013), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01302.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Ahmed S. Khalaf, Sultan A. Alharthi, Bill Hamilton, Igor Dolgov, Son Tran, and Phoebe O. Toups Dugas. 2020. A Framework of Input Devices to Support Designing Composite Wearable Computers. In Human-Computer Interaction. Multimodal and Natural Interaction, Masaaki Kurosu (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 401-427.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Ahmed S. Khalaf, Poom Pianpak, Sultan A. Alharthi, Zahra NaminiMianji, Ruth Torres, Son Tran, Igor Dolgov, and Phoebe O. Toups Dugas. 2018. An Architecture for Simulating Drones in Mixed Reality Games to Explore Future Search and Rescue Scenarios. In ISCRAM 2018 Conference Proceedings ? 15th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Kees Boersma and Brian Tomaszeski (Eds.). 971-982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Md. Nafiz Hasan Khan and Carman Neustaedter. 2019. An Exploratory Study of the Use of Drones for Assisting Firefighters During Emergency Situations. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 272:1–272:14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300502Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Hyun Young Kim, Bomyeong Kim, and Jinwoo Kim. 2016. The Naughty Drone: A Qualitative Research on Drone As Companion Device. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication(IMCOM ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91:1–91:6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2857546.2857639Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Andreas Kunz, Ali Alavi, Jonas Landgren, Asim Evren Yantaç, PawełWoźniak, Zoltán Sárosi, and Morten Fjeld. 2013. Tangible Tabletops for Emergency Response: An Exploratory Study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia, Interaction, Design and Innovation(MIDI ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10:1–10:8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500342.2500352Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Nicolas LaLone, Sultan A. Alharthi, and Phoebe O. Toups Dugas. 2019. A Vision of Augmented Reality for Urban Search and Rescue. In Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019(HTTF 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363466Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Nicolas LaLone, Phoebe O. Toups Dugas, and Andrea Tapia. 2020. The Structure of Citizen Bystander Offering Behaviors Immediately After the Boston Marathon Bombing. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. HICSS, Maui, Hawaii, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Jonas Landgren and Urban Nulden. 2007. A Study of Emergency Response Work: Patterns of Mobile Phone Interaction. In Proc.SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Comp. Sys.(CHI ’07). ACM, 1323–1332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Bruno Latour. 1996. On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt 47, 4 (1996), 369–381. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40878163Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Bruno Latour. 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford ; New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. A. N. Leont’ev. 1974. The Problem of Activity in Psychology. Soviet Psychology 13, 2 (1974), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-040513024Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Jean MacMillan, Elliot E. Entin, and Daniel Serfaty. 2004. Communication Overhead: The Hidden Cost of Team Cognition. In Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors that Drive Process and Performance, Eduardo Salas and Stephen M. Fiore (Eds.). American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA, 61–82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Martin N. Marshall. 1996. Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice 13, 6 (12 1996), 522–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. C. W. Mills. 1940. Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review 5 (1940), 904–913. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084524Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Jyoti Laxmi Mishra, David K. Allen, and Alan D. Pearman. 2011. Activity Theory as a methodological and analytical framework for information practices in Emergency Management. In 8th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management: From Early-Warning Systems to Preparedness and Training, ISCRAM 2011, L Sousa M.A. Santos (Ed.). Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, ISCRAM, Lisbon. http://idl.iscram.org/files/mishra/2011/ 773_Mishra_etal2011.pdfISSN: 2411-3387 Journal Abbreviation: ISCRAM 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Ann Morrison, Antti Oulasvirta, Peter Peltonen, Saija Lemmela, Giulio Jacucci, Gerhard Reitmayr, Jaana Näsänen, and Antti Juustila. 2009. Like Bees Around the Hive: A Comparative Study of a Mobile Augmented Reality Map. In Proc.SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Comp. Sys.(CHI ’09). ACM, 1889–1898.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Willem J. Muhren and Bartel Van de Walle. 2009. Sensemaking and information management in humanitarian disaster response: Observations from the triplex exercise. In Proc. 6th ISCRAM Conference, Vol. 32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Robin R. Murphy. 2004. Trial by fire [rescue robots]. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine 11, 3 (Sep. 2004), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2004.1337826Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. Robin R. Murphy and Jennifer L. Burke. 2005. Up from the Rubble: Lessons Learned about HRI from Search and Rescue. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 49, 3(2005), 437–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120504900347Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Bonnie A Nardi. 1996. Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  102. Bonnie A. Nardi and Vicki O’Day. 1999. Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. Mit Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. NBC News. 2017. Hurricanes Show Why Drones Are the Future of Disaster Relief. Online. https://goo.gl/oGZ7gH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Don Norman. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition (2013 ed.). Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Leysia Palen 2020. Crisis Informatics: Human-Centered Research on Tech & Crises. https://tinyurl.com/crisisinformaticsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Leysia Palen and Kenneth M. Anderson. 2016. Crisis informatics—New data for extraordinary times. Science 353, 6296 (2016), 224–225. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2579Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  107. Sharoda A. Paul and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2009. CoSense: Enhancing Sensemaking for Collaborative Web Search. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1771–1780. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518974Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. Sharoda A. Paul and Madhu C. Reddy. 2010. Understanding Together: Sensemaking in Collaborative Information Seeking. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718976Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  109. Loren D. Pfau. 2013. Wilderness search and rescue: Sources and uses of geospatial information. Master’s thesis. Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Loren D. Pfau and Justine I. Blanford. 2018. Use of Geospatial Data and Technology for Wilderness Search and Rescue by Nonprofit Organizations. The Professional Geographer 70, 3 (2018), 434–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2018.1432367Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  111. Yongqiang Qin, Jie Liu, Chenjun Wu, and Yuanchun Shi. 2012. uEmergency: A Collaborative System for Emergency Management on Very Large Tabletop. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces(ITS ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1145/2396636.2396710Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  112. Sarvapali Ramchurn, Feng Wu, Wenchao Jiang, Joel Fischer, Steve Reece, Stephen Roberts, Tom Rodden, Chris Greenhalgh, and Nicholas Jennings. 2016. Human–agent collaboration for disaster response. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 30, 1 (jan 2016), 82–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-015-9286-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Christian Reuter, Amanda Lee Hughes, and Marc-André Kaufhold. 2018. Social Media in Crisis Management: An Evaluation and Analysis of Crisis Informatics Research. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 34, 4(2018), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1427832Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  114. Yvonne Rogers, Kay Connelly, William Hazlewood, and Lenore Tedesco. 2009. Enhancing learning: a study of how mobile devices can facilitate sensemaking. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14, 2 (2009), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0250-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  115. Robert E. Roth. 2012. Cartographic Interaction Primitives: Framework and Synthesis. The Cartographic Journal 49, 4 (2012), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  116. Florian Segor, Axel Bürkle, Matthias Kollmann, and Rainer Schönbein. 2011. Instantaneous Autonomous Aerial Reconnaissance for Civil Applications - A UAV based approach to support security and rescue forces. In 6th International Conference on Systems ICONS. 72–76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Kathrin Sele and Simon Grand. 2016. Unpacking the Dynamics of Ecologies of Routines: Mediators and Their Generative Effects in Routine Interactions. Organization Science 27, 3 (2016), 722–738. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1031Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. Divya Shankar, Manish Agrawal, and H. Raghav Rao. 2011. Emergency Response to Mumbai Terror Attacks: An Activity Theory Analysis. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-123-2.ch004ISBN: 9781609601232 Pages: 46-58 Publisher: IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  119. Hitesh Nidhi Sharma, Sultan A. Alharthi, Igor Dolgov, and Phoebe O. Toups Dugas. 2017. A Framework Supporting Selecting Space to Make Place in Spatial Mixed Reality Play. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Irina Shklovski, Leysia Palen, and Jeannette Sutton. 2008. Finding Community Through Information and Communication Technology in Disaster Response. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460584Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  121. Thushari Silva, Vilas Wuwongse, and Hitesh Nidhi Sharma. 2012. Disaster mitigation and preparedness using linked open data. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 4, 5 (2012), 591–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-012-0128-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  122. Robert Soden and Leysia Palen. 2016. Infrastructure in the Wild: What Mapping in Post-Earthquake Nepal Reveals About Infrastructural Emergence. In Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Comp. Sys.(CHI ’16). ACM, 2796–2807.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. Diane H. Sonnenwald. 2016. Theory development in the information sciences. University of Texas Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2011. ”Voluntweeters”: Self-organizing by Digital Volunteers in Times of Crisis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979102Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  125. Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2013. Working and Sustaining the Virtual ”Disaster Desk”. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441832Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  126. Lucy Suchman. 2007. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  127. Lucy A. Suchman. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  128. TEEX. 2018. The Technical Search Specialist Training. Online. https://teex.org/Pages/Class.aspx?course=9P1230&courseTitle=Technical%20Search%20Specialist%20-%20Computer-Based%20Training.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. James B. Thomas, Shawn M. Clark, and Dennis A. Gioia. 1993. Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 36, 2 (1993), 239–270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  130. Phoebe O. Toups Dugas, William A. Hamilton, and Sultan A. Alharthi. 2016. Playing at Planning: Game Design Patterns from Disaster Response Practice. In Proc. 2016 An. Symp. Comp.-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY '16). ACM, 362-375.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. Phoebe O. Toups Dugas and Andruid Kerne. 2007. Implicit Coordination in Firefighting Practice: Design Implications for Teaching Fire Emergency Responders. In Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Comp. Sys.(CHI '07). ACM, 707-716.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. Phoebe O. Toups Dugas, Andruid Kerne, and William A. Hamilton. 2011. The Team Coordination Game: Zero-fidelity Simulation Abstracted from Fire Emergency Response Practice. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18, 4 (Dec. 2011), 23:1-23:37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2063231.2063237Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  133. Phoebe O. Toups Dugas, Nicolas Lalone, Sultan A. Alharthi, Hitesh Nidhi Sharma, and Andrew M. Webb. 2019. Making Maps Available for Play: Analyzing the Design of Game Cartography Interfaces. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 26, 5 (July 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3336144Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  134. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2008. National Incident Management System. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. Ushahidi. 2016. Ushahidi. https://www.ushahidi.com/. Accessed: 2016-04-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  136. Roht Valecha, Raghav Rao, Shambhu Upadhyaya, and Raj Sharman. 2019. An Activity Theory Approach to Modeling Dispatch-Mediated Emergency Response. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 20, 1 (Jan. 2019). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00528Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  137. Sarah Vieweg, Amanda L. Hughes, Kate Starbird, and Leysia Palen. 2010. Microblogging During Two Natural Hazards Events: What Twitter May Contribute to Situational Awareness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753486Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  138. S. Waharte and N. Trigoni. 2010. Supporting Search and Rescue Operations with UAVs. In 2010 International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies. 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1109/EST.2010.31Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  139. Yang Wang, Huichuan Xia, Yaxing Yao, and Yun Huang. 2016. Flying Eyes and Hidden Controllers: A Qualitative Study of People’s Privacy Perceptions of Civilian Drones in The US. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies3 (2016), 172 – 190. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/popets/2016/3/ article-p172.xmlGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  140. Colin Ware. 2012. Information visualization: perception for design. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  141. Karl E. Weick. 1993. The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly 38, 4 (1993), 628–652. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2393339Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  142. Karl E. Weick. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Foundations for Organizational Science, Vol. 3. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  143. T. D. Wilson. 2008. Activity Theory and Information Seeking. Annual Rev. Info. Sci & Technol. 42, 1 (Jan. 2008), 119–161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. Marisol Wong-Villacres, Cristina M. Velasquez, and Neha Kumar. 2017. Social Media for Earthquake Response: Unpacking Its Limitations with Care. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3134747Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  145. Jason Wuertz, Sultan A. Alharthi, William A. Hamilton, Scott Bateman, Carl Gutwin, Anthony Tang, Phoebe O. Toups Dugas, and Jessica Hammer. 2018. A Design Framework for Awareness Cues in Distributed Multiplayer Games. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173817Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An Activity Theory Analysis of Search & Rescue Collective Sensemaking and Planning Practices
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 2021
          10862 pages
          ISBN:9781450380966
          DOI:10.1145/3411764

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 May 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format