skip to main content
10.1145/3411764.3445287acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Disentangling the Motivational Pathways of Recreational Esports Gamblers: A Laddering Study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Whereas past CHI-related work has paid attention to various elements of the esports industry, there exists a scarcity of such research on the increasing convergence between esports and gambling. This study, therefore, aimed to shed light on the emerging phenomenon of esports betting in two ways. First, we theorized about its characteristics according to the 5W1H framework. Second, using semi-structured laddering interviews and Means-End Chain Theory, we assessed the esports betting motivations of young, male and recreational gamblers who interact with monetary and skin betting websites. Our results show that gamblers follow various motivational pathways when using an esports betting platform and construct their motives in relation to platform-specific properties and personal values. As such, we demonstrate that a holistic understanding of esports betting is of utmost importance if we want to explain and investigate its appeal to a worldwide audience.

References

  1. Kelly L. Adams, Gabriella Devia-Allen, and Maria A. Moore. 2019. What is Esports? In Understanding Esports. An Introduction to the Global Phenomenon (Ed. Ryan Rogers). Lexington Books, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Guo Freeman and Donghee Y. Wohn. 2017. eSports as An Emerging Research Context at CHI: Diverse Perspectives on Definitions. In CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing, May 06-11, 2017, Denver, Colorado, USA. ACM, New York, NY, 1601-1608. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053158Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jason G. Reitman, Maria J. Anderson-Coto, Minerva Wu, Je S. Lee, and Constance Steinkuehler. 2019. Esports Research: A Literature Review. Games and Culture 15, 1, 32-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019840892Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Justin Bonny, Lisa M. Castaneda, and Tom Swanson. 2016. Using an International Gaming Tournament to Study Individual Differences in MOBA Expertise and Cognitive Skills. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 07-12, 2016, San Jose, California, USA. ACM, New York, NY, 3473-3484. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858190Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Alex Leavitt, Brian Keegan, and Joshua Clark. 2016. Ping to Win?: Non-Verbal Communication and Team Performance in Competitive Online Multiplayer Games, In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 07-12, 2016, San Jose, California, USA. ACM, New York, NY, 4337-4350. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858132Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Simone Kriglstein, Günter Wallner, Sven Charleer, Kathrin Gerling, PejmanMirza-Babaei, Steven Shirra, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2020. Be Part Of It: Spectator Experience in Gaming and Esports. In CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 25-30, 2020, Honolulu, HI, USA. ACM, New York, NY, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375153Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ilya Musabirov, Dennis Bulygin, Paul Okopny, and Ksenia Konstantinova. 2018. Event-driven Spectators' Communication in Massive eSports Online Chats, In CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April, 21-26, 2018, Montreal, QC, Canada. ACM, New York, NY, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188447Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hibai Lopez-Gonzalez, and Mark D. Griffiths. 2018. Understanding the convergence of markets in online sports betting. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 53, 7, 807-823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690216680602Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Nancy Greer, Matthew Rockloff, Matthew Browne, Nerilee Hing, and Daniel L. King. 2019. Esports Betting and Skin Gambling: A Brief History. Journal of Gambling Issues, 43, 1 (Dec. 2019), 128-146. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2019.43.8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sebastian Deterding, Faltin Karlsen, Joseph Macey, Torril E. Mortensen, Heather Wardle, and David Zendle. 2020. The Convergence of Gaming and Gambling Research: What Can We Learn from Each Other? In DiGRA'20 - Abstract: Proceedings of the 2020 DiGRA International Conference. 02-06 Jun, 2020, Tampere, Finland. Retrieved from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/156462/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Seiie Jang, Eun-Jung Ko, and Woontack Woo. 2005. Unified User-Centric Context: Who, Where, When, What, How and Why. In Proceedings of the First Internaltional Workshop on Personalized Context Modeling and Management for UbiComp Applications, September 11, 2005, Tokyo, Japan. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 149, 26-34. Retrieved from https://www.cmc.is.i.nagoya-u.ac.jp/∼jang/paper/2005-ubipcmm.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bieke Zaman, Kristof Geurden, Rozane De Cock, Bob De Schutter, and Vero Vanden Abeele. 2014. Motivation profiles of online Poker players and the role of interface preferences: A laddering study among amateur and (semi-) professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 1 (Oct. 2014), 154-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jonathan Gutman. 1982. A Means-End Chain Model Based on Consumer Categorization Processes. Journal of marketing 46, 2, 60-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298204600207Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Chris Grove. 2016. eSports and gambling: Where's the action? Retrieved from https://www.greo.ca/Modules/EvidenceCentre/Details/esports-gambling-wheres-the-actionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Thomas J. Reynolds and Jonathan Gutman. 1988. Laddering theory, method, analysis and interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research, 28, 1 11-31. DOI: 10.4324/9781410600844-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Bieke Zaman. 2011. Laddering method with preschoolers. Understanding preschoolers' user experience with digital media. Ph.D. Dissertation. KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Retrieved from https://lirias.kuleuven.be/1858391?limo=0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Brett Abarbanel, Joseph Macey, Juho Hamari, and Rolando Melton. 2020. Gamers Who Gamble: Examining the Relationship Between Esports Spectatorship and Event Wagering. Journal of Emerging Sport Studies, 3, 1, Article 1, 23 pages. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.library.tru.ca/jess/vol3/iss1/1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. John George and Brett Sherrick. 2019. Competition Formats in Esports. In Understanding Esports. An Introduction to the Global Phenomenon (Ed. Ryan Rogers). Lexington Books, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Philip W. S. Newall, Lukasz Walasek, Rebecca Vázquez Kiesel, Elliot A. Ludvig, and Caroline Meyer. 2020. Request-a-bet sports betting products indicate patterns of bettor preference and bookmaker profits. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, Online first. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00054Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Philip W. S. Newall, Rebecca Cassidy, Lukasz Walasek, Elliot A. Ludvig, and Caroline Meyer. 2020. Who uses custom sports betting products? Addiction Research and Theory, Online First. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2020.1792887Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Esportsbets. 2020. Virtual Esports Betting - How Does VIrtual Betting Work for Esports Games? Retrieved from https://www.esportsbets.com/virtual-esports-betting/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Unibet. 2017. Betting on esports: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. Retrieved from https://www.unibet.com/betting/news/betting-on-esports-counter-strike-global-offensive-1.968660Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Unibet. 2017. Betting on Esports: League of legends. Retrieved from https://www.unibet.com/betting/news/betting-on-esports-league-of-legends-1.968770Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Unibet Community. 2018. Request a bet. Retrieved from https://www.unibetcommunity.com/t5/Betting-and-Sports/Request-A-Bet/td-p/139366Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Unibet. 2020. Virtual Sports Betting Guide. Retrieved from https://www.unibet.com/betting/rugby-league%7C1000154363.odds/guides/virtual-sports-betting-guide-1.1427092Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Unibet. 2020. Unibet Politics Betting. Retrieved from https://www.unibet.eu/betting/sports/filter/politics/1004712871Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Stewart N. Ethier. 2010. Probability and its Applications, Vol: The Doctrine of Chances. Probablistic Aspects of Gambling (2010 Ed.) Springer, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Elizabeth A. Killick, and Mark D. Griffiths. 2019. In-Play Sports Betting: a Scoping Study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 14, 1, 1456–1495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9896-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Daniel L. King, and Paul H. Delfabbro. 2016. Early exposure to digital simulated gambling: A review and conceptual model. Computers in Human Behavior 55, 1 (Feb. 2016), 198-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Joseph Macey, and Juho Hamari. 2019. eSports, skins and loot boxes: Participants, practices and problematic behaviour associated with emergent forms of gambling. New Media & Society 21, 1, 20-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818786216Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Unibet. 2020. Deposit limits. Retrieved from https://www.unibetcommunity.com/t5/Help-Support/Does-a-maximum-limit-amount-exist-for-a-bet/td-p/217952Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Brett L. Abarbanel and Joseph Macey. 2019. VGO, NFT, OMG! Commentary on continued developments in skins wagering. Gaming Law Review 23, 1 (Feb. 2019), 23-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2019.2312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Chris Grove. 2016. Understanding skin gambling. Retrieved from http://www.esportsbettingreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/A-Guide-To-Skin-Gambling.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. CSGO Empire. 2020. Match Betting. Retrieved from https://csgoempire.com/match-bettingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. VGO Casinos. 2021. Best VGO Gambling Sites 2021 with Free Coins. Retrieved from https://vgocasinos.com/vgo-gamblingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Bwin Help. 2020. General Information. 2020. Retrieved from https://help.bwin.com/en/general-information/payments/payment-methodsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. European Gaming and Betting Association. 2020. Licences EU Market. Retrieved from https://www.egba.eu/eu-market/licensing/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sally Gainsbury, Brett L. Abarbanel, and Alex Blaszczynski. 2017. Game on: Comparison of demographic profiles, consumption behaviours, and gambling site selection criteria of esports and sports bettors. Gaming Law Review 21, 8, 575-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2017.21813Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. BETTINGSITE.com.au. How to use a VPN when betting from abroad. Retrieved August 30, 2020 from https://bettingsite.com.au/vpn/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Joseph Macey, Brett L. Abarbanel, and Juho Hamari. 2020. What predicts esports betting? A study on consumption of video games, esports, gambling and demographic factors. New Media & Society, Online First, 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820908510Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Andrew C. Billings and Jue Hou. 2019. The Origins of Esport: A Helf Century History of an “Overnight” Succes. In Understanding Esports. An Introduction to the Global Phenomenon (Ed. Ryan Rogers). Lexington Books, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Alex M.T. Russell, Nerilee Hing, Matthew Browne, En Li, and Peter Vitartas. 2019. Who Bets on Micro Events (Microbets) in Sports? Journal of Gambling Studies 35, 1, 205-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9810-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Gambling Commission. 2017. Virtual currencies, eSports and social casino gaming – position paper. Retrieved from https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/PDF/Virtual-currencies-eSports-and-social-casino-gaming.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Superdata Research. 2017. Gambling and digital games in the Netherlands (January 2017). Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/344252413/Superdata-Deliverable-Gambling-Digital-Games-January-2017-002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Gambling Commission. 2018. Gambling participation in 2017: behaviour, awareness and attitudes. Retrieved from https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/PDF/survey-data/Gambling-participation-in-2018-behaviour-awareness-and-attitudes.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Joseph Macey, and Juho Hamari. 2018. Investigating relationships between video gaming, spectating esports, and gambling. Computers in Human Behavior 80, 1, 344-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.027Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Paul Delfabbro, and Daniel L. King. 2020. Gaming-gambling convergence: evaluating evidence for the ‘gateway’ hypothesis. International Gambling Studies, Online First. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2020.17684300Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Kevin Sweeney, Mark Tuttle, and Milo D. Berg. 2019. Esports Gambling: Market Structure and Biases. Games and Culture, Online First. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019872389Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Sally Gainsbury, Brett L. Abarbanel, and Alex Blaszczynski. 2017. Intensity and gambling harms: Exploring breadth of gambling involvement among esports bettors. Gaming Law Review 21, 8, 610-615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2017.21812Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Icek Ajzen, and Martin Fishbein. 2010. Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. Psychology press, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Per Binde. 2013. Why people gamble: a model with five motivational dimensions. International Gambling Studies 13(1), 81-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2012.712150Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Thitapa Shinaprayoon, Nathan T. Carter, and Adam S. Goodie. 2017. The Modified Gambling Motivation Scale: Confirmatory factor analysis and links with problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues 37, 1, 108-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2018.37.5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Natale Canale, Massimo Santinelloa, and Mark D.Griffiths. 2015. Validation of the reasons for gambling questionnaire (RGQ) in a British population survey. Addictive Behaviors 45, 1 (Jun. 2015), 276–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.01.035Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Denis F. Polit and Cheryl T. Beck (2010). Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies 47, 11 (Nov. 2010), 1451-1458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Katta Spiel, Oliver L. Haimson, and Danielle Lottridge. 2019. How to do better with gender on surveys: a guide for HCI researchers. Interactions 26, 4 (Jun. 2019), 62-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3338283Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Samuel C. Peter, Qian Li, James P. Whelan, and Andrew W. Meyers. 2019. Public Stigma Across Addictive Behaviors: Casino Gambling, eSports Gambling, and Internet Gaming. Journal of Gambling Studies 35, 1 (Mar. 2019), 247-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9775-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Klaus G. Grunert and Tino Bech-Larsen. 2005. Explaining choice option attractiveness by beliefs elicited by the laddering method. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 2 (Apr. 2005), 223-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2004.04.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Derek Layder. 1998. Sociological practice: linking theory and social research. Sage, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Shalom H. Schwartz. 2012. An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online readings in Psychology and Culture 2, 1, Article 11 (December 2012), 20 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Belgian Gaming Commission. 2016. Gaming Commission 2016 Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.gamingcommission.be/opencms/opencms/jhksweb_nl/gamingcommission/RAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Vlaamse expertisecentrum Alcohol en andere Drugs (VAD). 2020. E-sports, e-sportsbetting & skin betting : van competitief multiplayer-gamen tot ‘nieuwe’ gokfenomenen? Retrieved from https://www.vad.be/artikels/detail/e-sport-e-sportsbetting–skin-betting-van-competitief-multiplayer-gamen-tot-nieuwe-gokfenomenenGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Martin Fishbein, Icek Ajzen, and Ron Hinkle. 1980. Predicting and understanding voting in American elections: Effects of external variables. In Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, NJ, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Gail Jefferson. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Greg Guest, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson. 2006. How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18, 1 (Feb. 2006), 59-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2, 77-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. June Cotte. 1997. Chances, Trances, And Lots Of Slots: Gambling Motives And Consumption Experiences. Journal of Leisure Research 29,4, 380-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1997.11949805Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Peggy Sue Loroz. 2004. Golden‐age gambling: Psychological benefits and self‐concept dynamics in aging consumers' consumption experiences. Psychology & Marketing, 21, 5 (Mar. 2004), 323-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Xiang Fang and John C. Mowen. 2009. Examining the trait and functional motive antecedents of four gambling activities: slot machines, skilled card games, sports betting, and promotional games. Journal of Consumer Marketing 26, 2, 121-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760910940483Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Rodney J. Paul and Andrew P. Weinbach. 2010. The Determinants of Betting Volume for Sports in North America: Evidence of Sports Betting as Consumption in the NBA and NHL. International Journal of Sport Finance 5, 2 (May 2010), 128-140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Brad R. Humphreys, Rodney J. Paul, and Andrew P. Weinbach. 2013. Consumption benefits and gambling: Evidence from the NCAA basketball betting market. Journal of Economic Psychology 39, 1 (Dec. 2013), 376-386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.05.010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Brett L. Abarbanel. 2014. Differences in motivational dimensions across gambling frequency, game choice and medium of play in the United Kingdom. International Gambling Studies 14, 3 (Nov. 2014), 472-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2014.966131Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Matthew Lamont and Nerilee Hing. 2018. Sports Betting Motivations Among Young Men: An Adaptive Theory Analysis. Leisure Sciences 42, 2 (Sep. 2018), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2018.1483852Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Stina Bengtsson, Karin Fast, André Jansson, and Johan Lindell. 2020. Media and basic desires: An approach to measuring the mediatization of daily human life. Communications, Ahead-of-print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-0122Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Choong-Ki Lee, Yong-Ki Lee, Bo J. Bernhard, and Yoo-Skik Yoon. 2006. Segmenting casino gamblers by motivation: A cluster analysis of Korean gamblers. Tourism Management 27, 5 (Oct. 2005), 856-866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.05.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Choong-Ki Lee, Bongkoo Lee, Bo J. Bernhard, and Tae K. Lee. 2009. A Comparative Study of Involvement and Motivation among Casino Gamblers. Psychiatry investigation 6, 3 (Jul. 2009), 141-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2009.6.3.141Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In CHI '94: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts. ACM, New York, NY, 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191729Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. usability.gov. 2020. Heuristic Evaluations and Expert Reviews. Retrieved from https://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/heuristic-evaluation.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Unibet Community. 2020. Unibet Community. Retrieved from https://www.unibetcommunity.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Winfried Schulz. 2004. Reconstructing Mediatization as an Analytical Concept. European Journal of Communication 19, 1 (Mar. 2004), 87-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323104040696Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Clayton Neighbors, Ty W. Lostutter, Mary E. Larimer, and Ruby Y. Takushi. 2002. Measuring Gambling Outcomes Among College Students. Journal of Gambling Studies 18, 4 (Winter 2002), 339-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021013132430Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. David Zendle, Rachel Meyer, and Harriet Over. 2019. Adolescents and loot boxes: Links with problem gambling and motivations for purchase. Royal Society Open Science 6, 6 (June 2019), 18 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190049Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Disentangling the Motivational Pathways of Recreational Esports Gamblers: A Laddering Study
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
              May 2021
              10862 pages
              ISBN:9781450380966
              DOI:10.1145/3411764

              Copyright © 2021 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 7 May 2021

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

              Upcoming Conference

              CHI '24
              CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
              May 11 - 16, 2024
              Honolulu , HI , USA

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format