skip to main content
10.1145/3411764.3445530acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

ThroughHand: 2D Tactile Interaction to Simultaneously Recognize and Touch Multiple Objects

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Users with visual impairments find it difficult to enjoy real-time 2D interactive applications on the touchscreen. Touchscreen applications such as sports games often require simultaneous recognition of and interaction with multiple moving targets through vision. To mitigate this issue, we propose ThroughHand, a novel tactile interaction that enables users with visual impairments to interact with multiple dynamic objects in real time. We designed the ThroughHand interaction to utilize the potential of the human tactile sense that spatially registers both sides of the hand with respect to each other. ThroughHand allows interaction with multiple objects by enabling users to perceive the objects using the palm while providing a touch input space on the back of the same hand. A user study verified that ThroughHand enables users to locate stimuli on the palm with a margin of error of approximately 13 mm and effectively provides a real-time 2D interaction experience for users with visual impairments.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3411764.3445530_videofigure.mp4

Supplemental video

mp4

80.7 MB

References

  1. Dragan Ahmetovic, Cristian Bernareggi, Sergio Mascetti, and Federico Pini. 2020. SoundLines: Exploration of Line Segments through Sonification and Multi-touch Interaction. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Virtual Event, Greece, 1–3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Paul Bach-y Rita and Stephen W Kercel. 2003. Sensory substitution and the human–machine interface. Trends in cognitive sciences 7, 12 (2003), 541–546.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jonathan Bell, Stanley Bolanowski, and Mark H Holmes. 1994. The structure and function of Pacinian corpuscles: a review. Progress in neurobiology 42, 1 (1994), 79–128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, Whan Woong Kim, and Darshak Patel. 2007. Does body movement engage you more in digital game play? and why?. In International conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction. Springer, Springer, Lisbon, Portugal, 102–113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Elyse DZ Chase, Alexa Fay Siu, Abena Boadi-Agyemang, Gene SH Kim, Eric J Gonzalez, and Sean Follmer. 2020. PantoGuide: A Haptic and Audio Guidance System To Support Tactile Graphics Exploration. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Virtual Event, Greece, 1–4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Maurizio De Pascale, Sara Mulatto, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2008. Bringing haptics to second life for visually impaired people. In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications. Springer, Springer, Madrid, Spain, 896–905.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Paul M Fitts. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.Journal of experimental psychology 47, 6 (1954), 381.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. inFORM: dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation.. In Uist. ACM, St. Andrews, United Kingdom, 2501988–2502032.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Clifton Forlines, Daniel Wigdor, Chia Shen, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2007. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, San Jose, California, USA, 647–656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G M A Games. 2020. Shades of Doom. G M A Games. http://www.gmagames.com/sod.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dan Gärdenfors. 2003. Designing sound-based computer games. Digital Creativity 14, 2 (2003), 111–114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Matti Gröhn, Tapio Lokki, and Tapio Takala. 2005. Comparison of auditory, visual, and audiovisual navigation in a 3D space. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 2, 4 (2005), 564–570.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Darren Guinness, Annika Muehlbradt, Daniel Szafir, and Shaun K Kane. 2019. RoboGraphics: Using Mobile Robots to Create Dynamic Tactile Graphics. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 673–675.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. HyperBraille. 2007. The graphics-enabled display for blind computer users. HyperBraille. http://www.hyperbraille.de/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Apple Inc.2020. Apple Accessibility. Apple Inc. https://www.apple.com/accessibility/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Google Inc.2009. TalkBack: An Open Source Screenreader For Android. Google Inc. https://opensource.googleblog.com/2009/10/talkback-open-source-screenreader-for.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ali Israr and Ivan Poupyrev. 2011. Tactile brush: drawing on skin with a tactile grid display. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2019–2028.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Roland S Johansson and Åke B Vallbo. 1983. Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand. Trends in neurosciences 6 (1983), 27–32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lynette A Jones and Susan J Lederman. 2006. Human hand function. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hiroyuki Kajimoto, Yonezo Kanno, and Susumu Tachi. 2006. A Vision Substitution System Using Forehead Electrical Stimulation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Sketches (Boston, Massachusetts) (SIGGRAPH ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 39–es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1179849.1179898Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hiroyuki Kajimoto, Masaki Suzuki, and Yonezo Kanno. 2014. HamsaTouch: feel the world through your palm. In CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Toronto, ON, Canada, 571–574.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Tapio Lokki and Matti Grohn. 2005. Navigation with auditory cues in a virtual environment. IEEE MultiMedia 12, 2 (2005), 80–86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. I Scott MacKenzie. 1992. Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-computer interaction 7, 1 (1992), 91–139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Daniel Miller, Aaron Parecki, and Sarah A Douglas. 2007. Finger dance: a sound game for blind people. In Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. ACM, Tempe, Arizona, USA, 253–254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Tony Morelli, John Foley, and Eelke Folmer. 2010. Vi-bowling: a tactile spatial exergame for individuals with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. ACM, Orlando, FL, USA, 179–186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ken Nakagaki, Daniel Fitzgerald, Zhiyao (John) Ma, Luke Vink, Daniel Levine, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2019. InFORCE: Bi-Directional ‘Force’ Shape Display for Haptic Interaction. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Tempe, Arizona, USA) (TEI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3295621Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Uran Oh and Leah Findlater. 2015. A performance comparison of on-hand versus on-phone nonvisual input by blind and sighted users. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 7, 4 (2015), 1–20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Michael A Oren. 2007. Speed sonic across the span: building a platform audio game. In CHI’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose, California, USA, 2231–2236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. David Parker and Dianne Pawluk. 2019. Exploration of Multi-fingered Access to 2D Spatial Information. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 618–620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Andrzej Radecki, Michał Bujacz, Piotr Skulimowski, and Paweł Strumiłło. 2020. Interactive sonification of images in serious games as an education aid for visually impaired children. British Journal of Educational Technology 51, 2 (2020), 473–497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Oliver Schneider, Jotaro Shigeyama, Robert Kovacs, Thijs Jan Roumen, Sebastian Marwecki, Nico Boeckhoff, Daniel Amadeus Gloeckner, Jonas Bounama, and Patrick Baudisch. 2018. DualPanto: A Haptic Device that Enables Blind Users to Continuously Interact with Virtual Worlds. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, Berlin, Germany, 877–887.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Oliver S Schneider, Ali Israr, and Karon E MacLean. 2015. Tactile animation by direct manipulation of grid displays. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. ACM, Charlotte, NC, USA, 21–30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Katherine O Sofia and Lynette Jones. 2013. Mechanical and psychophysical studies of surface wave propagation during vibrotactile stimulation. IEEE transactions on haptics 6, 3 (2013), 320–329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. AB Vallbo and RS Johansson. 1978. The tactile sensory innervation of the glabrous skin of the human hand. Active touch 2954(1978), 29–54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Angel Walia, Prakhar Goel, Varnika Kairon, and Mayank Jain. 2020. HapTech: Exploring Haptics in Gaming for the Visually Impaired. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu, HI, USA, 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Tetsuya Watanabe, Makoto Kobayashi, Shoichiro Ono, and Keiko Yokoyama. 2006. Practical use of interactive tactile graphic display system at a school for the blind. In Proc. Fourth International Conference on Multimedia and Information and Communication Technologies in Education (m-ICTE). Citeseer, FORMATEX, Seville, Spain, 1111–1115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Sidney Weinstein. 1968. Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex and laterality. The skin senses 1, 1 (1968), 195–218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Gareth R White, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, and Graham McAllister. 2008. Toward accessible 3D virtual environments for the blind and visually impaired. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts. ACM, Athens, Greece, 134–141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Koji Yatani, Nikola Banovic, and Khai Truong. 2012. SpaceSense: representing geographical information to visually impaired people using spatial tactile feedback. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Austin, TX, USA, 415–424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Bei Yuan and Eelke Folmer. 2008. Blind hero: enabling guitar hero for the visually impaired. In Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. ACM, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 169–176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Bei Yuan, Eelke Folmer, and Frederick C Harris. 2011. Game accessibility: a survey. Universal Access in the information Society 10, 1 (2011), 81–100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Juan Jose Zarate, Olexandr Gudozhnik, Anthony Sébastien Ruch, and Herbert Shea. 2017. Keep in touch: portable haptic display with 192 high speed taxels. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, Denver, CO, USA, 349–352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. ThroughHand: 2D Tactile Interaction to Simultaneously Recognize and Touch Multiple Objects
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
              May 2021
              10862 pages
              ISBN:9781450380966
              DOI:10.1145/3411764

              Copyright © 2021 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 7 May 2021

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format