research-article

Fighting Fires and Powering Steam Locomotives: Distribution of Control and Its Role in Social Interaction at Tangible Interactive Museum Exhibits

Authors:

Loraine Clarke,

Ian RuthvenAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 344, Pages 1 - 17

https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445534

Published: 07 May 2021 Publication History

Abstract

We present a video-analysis study of museum visitors’ interactions at two tangible interactive exhibits in a transport museum. Our focus is on groups’ social and shared interactions, in particular how exhibit setup and structure influence collaboration patterns. Behaviors at the exhibits included individuals focusing beyond their personal activity towards companions’ interaction, adults participating via physical interaction, and visitors taking opportunities to interact when companions moved between sections of the exhibit or stepped back from interaction. We demonstrate how exhibits’ physical configuration and interactive control engendered behavioral patterns. Systematic analysis reveals how different configurations (concerning physical-spatial hardware and interactive software) distribute control differently amongst visitors. We present four mechanisms for how control can be distributed at an interactive installation: functional, temporal, physical and indirect verbal. In summary, our work explores how mechanisms that distribute control influence patterns of shared interaction with the exhibits and social interaction between museum visitor companions.

References

[1]

Sue Allen. 2003. Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In Learning conversations in museums, Gaea Leinhardt and Kevin Crowley (Eds.). Routledge, London, New York, 265–309.

[2]

David K Allison and Tom Gwaltney. 1991. How People Use Electronic Interactives: ”Information Age-People, Information & Technology”. In International Cultural Heritage Informatics Meetings (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) (ichim91). Archives & Museum Informatics, Pittsburgh, USA, 62–73. http://www.archimuse.com/publishing/hypermedia/hypermedia.Ch9.pdf

[3]

Alissa N. Antle, Alyssa F. Wise, Amanda Hall, Saba Nowroozi, Perry Tan, Jillian Warren, Rachael Eckersley, and Michelle Fan. 2013. Youtopia: A Collaborative, Tangible, Multi-Touch, Sustainability Learning Activity. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children(New York, New York, USA) (IDC ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 565–568. https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485866

Digital Library

[4]

Paul M. Aoki, Rebecca E. Grinter, Amy Hurst, Margaret H. Szymanski, James D. Thornton, and Allison Woodruff. 2002. Sotto Voce: Exploring the Interplay of Conversation and Mobile Audio Spaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) (CHI ’02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1145/503376.503454

Digital Library

[5]

Chantal Barriault and David Pearson. 2010. Assessing exhibits for learning in science centers: A practical tool. Visitor Studies 13, 1 (April 2010), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645571003618824

[6]

Katja Battarbee. 2004. Co-experience: understanding user experiences in interaction. Aalto University, ISBN 9515581613. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:951-558-161-3

[7]

Steve Benford, Benjamin B. Bederson, Karl-Petter Åkesson, Victor Bayon, Allison Druin, Pär Hansson, Juan Pablo Hourcade, Rob Ingram, Helen Neale, Claire O’Malley, Kristian T. Simsarian, Danaë Stanton, Yngve Sundblad, and Gustav Taxén. 2000. Designing Storytelling Technologies to Encouraging Collaboration between Young Children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, The Netherlands) (CHI ’00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332502

Digital Library

[8]

Florian Block, James Hammerman, Michael Horn, Amy Spiegel, Jonathan Christiansen, Brenda Phillips, Judy Diamond, E. Margaret Evans, and Chia Shen. 2015. Fluid Grouping: Quantifying Group Engagement around Interactive Tabletop Exhibits in the Wild. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 867–876. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702231

Digital Library

[9]

Florian Block, Michael S. Horn, Brenda Caldwell Phillips, Judy Diamond, E. Margaret Evans, and Chia Shen. 2012. The DeepTree exhibit: Visualizing the tree of life to facilitate informal learning. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 12 (Dec. 2012), 2789–2798. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.272

Digital Library

[10]

Minda Borun, Margaret Chambers, and Ann Cleghorn. 1996. Families are learning in science museums. Curator: The Museum Journal 39, 2 (May 1996), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1996.tb01084.x

[11]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (July 2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[12]

Luigina Ciolfi and Liam J. Bannon. 2007. Designing hybrid places: merging interaction design, ubiquitous technologies and geographies of the museum space. CoDesign 3, 3 (June 2007), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701524559

[13]

Loraine Clarke and Eva Hornecker. 2013. Experience, Engagement and Social Interaction at a Steam Locomotive Multimodal Interactive Museum Exhibit. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI EA ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 613–618. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468464

Digital Library

[14]

Kevin Crowley, Maureen A. Callanan, Jennifer L. Jipson, Jodi Galco, Karen Topping, and Jeff Shrager. 2001. Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent‐child activity. Science Education 85, 6 (Oct. 2001), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1035

[15]

Peter Dalsgaard and Christian Dindler. 2009. Peepholes as means of engagement in interaction design. In Proceedings of Nordes (Oslo, Norway) (Nordes 2009). Nordes, Norway. https://archive.nordes.org/index.php/n13/article/view/56

[16]

Peter Dalsgaard, Christian Dindler, and Kim Halskov. 2011. Understanding the dynamics of engaging interaction in public spaces. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2011. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 212–229.

[17]

Peter Dalsgaard and Kim Halskov. 2014. Tangible 3D Tabletops. ACM Interactions 21, 5 (Sept. 2014), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/2658859

Digital Library

[18]

Maurice Davies and Christian Heath. 2014. “Good” organisational reasons for “ineffectual” research: Evaluating summative evaluation of museums and galleries. Cultural Trends 23, 1 (Dec. 2014), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2014.862002

[19]

Stéphane Debenedetti. 2003. Investigating the Role of Companions in the Art Museum Experience. International Journal of Arts Management 5, 3 (2003), 52–63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41064797

[20]

Judy Diamond. 1986. The behavior of family groups in science museums. Curator: The Museum Journal 29, 2 (June 1986), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1986.tb01434.x

[21]

Lynn D Dierking. 1989. The family museum experience: Implications from research. The Journal of Museum Education 14, 2 (1989), 9–11. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40478807

[22]

Christian Dindler, Ole Sejer Iversen, and Peter Gall Krogh. 2011. Engagement through Mixed Modalities. ACM Interactions 18, 4 (July 2011), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978822.1978830

Digital Library

[23]

John H Falk and Lynn D Dierking. 2013. The museum experience revisited. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.

[24]

Gregory Guest, Kathleen M MacQueen, and Emily E Namey. 2012. Introduction to applied thematic analysis. In Applied thematic analysis, Gregory Guest, Kathleen M MacQueen, and Emily E Namey(Eds.). SAGE Publications, Inc., California, USA, 3–20. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436.n1

[25]

Christian Heath, Jon Hindmarsh, and Paul Luff. 2010. Video in qualitative research. Sage Publications Ltd, London, U.K.

[26]

Christian Heath and Dirk vom Lehn. 2002. Misconstruing interactivity. In Proceedings of interactive Learning in Museums of Art and Design, V&A Museum London. V&A, London, U.K.

[27]

Christian Heath and Dirk vom Lehn. 2008. Configuring ’Interactivity’ - Enhancing Engagement in Science Centres and Museums. Social Studies of Science 38, 1 (Feb. 2008), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707084152

[28]

Christian Heath, Dirk vom Lehn, and Jonathan Osborne. 2005. Interaction and interactives: collaboration and participation with computer-based exhibits. Public Understanding of Science 14, 1 (Jan. 2005), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662505047343

[29]

George E Hein. 2002. Learning in the Museum. Routledge, London, New York.

[30]

Jon Hindmarsh, Christian Heath, Dirk vom Lehn, and Jason Cleverly. 2005. Creating assemblies in public environments: Social interaction, interactive exhibits and CSCW. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 14, 1 (Feb. 2005), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-004-1814-8

Digital Library

[31]

Uta Hinrichs. 2013. Open-Ended Explorations in Exhibition Spaces: A Case for Information Visualization and Large Direct-Touch Displays. University of Calgary, Canada, PRISM, Calgary, Candada. https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/10182

[32]

Michael Horn, Zeina Atrash Leong, Florian Block, Judy Diamond, E. Margaret Evans, Brenda Phillips, and Chia Shen. 2012. Of BATs and APEs: An Interactive Tabletop Game for Natural History Museums. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2059–2068. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208355

Digital Library

[33]

Eva Hornecker. 2005. A design theme for tangible interaction: embodied facilitation. In Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Paris, France) (ECSCW 2005). Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 23–43.

[34]

Eva Hornecker. 2008. “I don’t understand it either, but it is cool” - visitor interactions with a multi-touch table in a museum. In 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems. IEEE, New Jersey, USA, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/TABLETOP.2008.4660193

[35]

Eva Hornecker. 2010. Interactions around a Contextually Embedded System. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI’10)(Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) (TEI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/1709886.1709916

Digital Library

[36]

Eva Hornecker. 2016. The To-and-Fro of Sense Making: Supporting Users’ Active Indexing in Museums. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 23, 2, Article 10 (May 2016), 48 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2882785

Digital Library

[37]

Eva Hornecker and Luigina Ciolfi. 2019. Human-Computer Interactions in Museums. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, California, USA. i–171 pages. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00901ED1V01Y201902HCI042

[38]

Eva Hornecker, Paul Marshall, and Yvonne Rogers. 2007. From Entry to Access: How Shareability Comes About. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI’07)(DPPI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1145/1314161.1314191

Digital Library

[39]

Eva Hornecker and Emma Nicol. 2012. What Do Lab-Based User Studies Tell Us about in-the-Wild Behavior? Insights from a Study of Museum Interactives. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS’12)(DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318010

Digital Library

[40]

Eva Hornecker and Matthias Stifter. 2006. Digital Backpacking in the Museum with a SmartCard. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand Chapter’s International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design Centered HCI (Christchurch, New Zealand) (CHINZ ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1145/1152760.1152773

Digital Library

[41]

Brigitte Jordan and Austin Henderson. 1995. Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The journal of the learning sciences 4, 1 (1995), 39–103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1466849

[42]

Martin Kaltenbrunner. 2009. ReacTIVision and TUIO: A Tangible Tabletop Toolkit. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS’09) (Banff, Alberta, Canada) (ITS ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/1731903.1731906

Digital Library

[43]

Lynda Kelly, Gillian Savage, Janette Griffin, and Susan Tonkin. 2004. Knowledge Quest: Australian families visit museums. Australian Museum, Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

[44]

Hope Jensen Leichter, Karen Hensel, and Erik Larsen. 1989. Families and museums: Issues and perspectives. Marriage & Family Review 13, 3-4 (1989), 15–50. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v13n03_03

[45]

Gaea Leinhardt and Kevin Crowley. 2002. Objects of learning, objects of talk: Changing minds in museums. In Perspectives on Object-Centered Learning in Museums, Scott G. Paris (Ed.). Routledge, New York, 301–324.

[46]

Martin Ludvigsen. 2005. Designing for social use in public places – A conceptual framework of social interaction. In Proceedings of Designing Pleasurable Products Interfaces (DPPI’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142459

Digital Library

[47]

Kathleen McLean and Catherine McEver. 2004. Are We There Yet?: Conversations about Best Practices in Science Exhibition Development. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.

[48]

Robin Meisner, Dirk vom Lehn, Christian Heath, Alex Burch, Ben Gammon, and Molly Reisman. 2007. Exhibiting performance: Co‐participation in science centres and museums. International Journal of Science Education 29, 12 (Sept. 2007), 1531–1555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701494050

[49]

Olufemi Omojola, E Rehmi Post, Matthew D Hancher, Yael Maguire, Ravikanth Pappu, Bernd Schoner, Peter R Russo, Richard Fletcher, and Neil Gershenfeld. 2000. An installation of interactive furniture. IBM Systems Journal 39, 3 & 4 (2000), 861–879. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.393.0861

Digital Library

[50]

Menisha Patel, Christian Heath, Paul Luff, Dirk vom Lehn, and Jason Cleverly. 2016. Playing with words: creativity and interaction in museums and galleries. Museum Management and Curatorship 31, 1 (Dec. 2016), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2015.1102641

[51]

Andrew J Pekarik, Zahava D Doering, and David A Karns. 1999. Exploring satisfying experiences in museums. Curator: The Museum Journal 42, 2 (April 1999), 152–173.

[52]

Deborah L. Perry. 2012. What makes learning fun?: principles for the design of intrinsically motivating museum exhibits. Altamira Press, Lanham, MD.

[53]

Barbara Piscitelli and Katrina Weier. 2002. Learning with, through, and about art: The role of social interactions. In Perspectives on object-centered learning in museums, Scott G. Paris (Ed.). Routledge, New York, USA, 121–151.

[54]

Stuart Reeves, Steve Benford, Claire O’Malley, and Mike Fraser. 2005. Designing the Spectator Experience. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CHI ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 741–750. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055074

Digital Library

[55]

Yvonne Rogers, Youn-kyung Lim, William R. Hazlewood, and Paul Marshall. 2009. Equal opportunities: Do shareable interfaces promote more group participation than single user displays?Human–Computer Interaction 24, 1-2 (April 2009), 79–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370020902739379

[56]

Y. Rogers, S. Price, G. Fitzpatrick, R. Fleck, E. Harris, H. Smith, C. Randell, H. Muller, C. O’Malley, D. Stanton, M. Thompson, and M. Weal. 2004. Ambient Wood: Designing New Forms of Digital Augmentation for Learning Outdoors. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Maryland) (IDC ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1017833.1017834

Digital Library

[57]

Scott S. Snibbe and Hayes S. Raffle. 2009. Social Immersive Media: Pursuing Best Practices for Multi-User Interactive Camera/Projector Exhibits. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1447–1456. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518920

Digital Library

[58]

Danae Stanton, Victor Bayon, Helen Neale, Ahmed Ghali, Steve Benford, Sue Cobb, Rob Ingram, Claire O’Malley, John Wilson, and Tony Pridmore. 2001. Classroom Collaboration in the Design of Tangible Interfaces for Storytelling. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CHI ’01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 482–489. https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365322

Digital Library

[59]

Olov Ståhl, Anders Wallberg, Jonas Söderberg, Jan Humble, Lennart E. Fahlén, Adrian Bullock, and Jenny Lundberg. 2002. Information Exploration Using The Pond. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments (Bonn, Germany) (CVE ’02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/571878.571890

Digital Library

[60]

Robyn Taylor, John Bowers, Bettina Nissen, Gavin Wood, Qasim Chaudhry, Peter Wright, Lindsey Bruce, Sarah Glynn, Helen Mallinson, and Roy Bearpark. 2015. Making Magic: Designing for Open Interactions in Museum Settings. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Glasgow, United Kingdom) (C&C ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2757241

Digital Library

[61]

Katie Salen Tekinbas and Eric Zimmerman. 2003. Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Digital Library

[62]

Peter Tolmie, Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Tom Rodden, and Stuart Reeves. 2014. Supporting Group Interactions in Museum Visiting. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW’14)(Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (CSCW ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1049–1059. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531619

Digital Library

[63]

Dirk vom Lehn and Christian Heath. 2005. Accounting for new technology in museum exhibitions. International Journal of Arts Management 7, 3 (2005), 11–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41064849

[64]

Dirk vom Lehn and Christian Heath. 2007. Social interaction in museums and galleries: A note on video-based field studies. In Video and the Learning Sciences, Ricki Goldman, Roy Pea, Brigid Barron, and Sharon J. Derry(Eds.). Routledge / Taylor & Francis, New York, USA, 287–301. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203877258

[65]

Dirk vom Lehn and Christian Heath. 2016. Action at the exhibit face: video and the analysis of social interaction in museums and galleries. Journal of Marketing Management 32, 15-16 (June 2016), 1441–1457. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1188846

[66]

Ron Wakkary, Marek Hatala, Kevin Muise, Karen Tanenbaum, Greg Corness, Bardia Mohabbati, and Jim Budd. 2009. Kurio: A Museum Guide for Families. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1145/1517664.1517712

Digital Library

[67]

Kasia Warpas. 2014. Designing for Dream Spaces. ACM Interactions 21, 3 (May 2014), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1145/2600020

Digital Library

[68]

Alyssa Friend Wise, Alissa Nicole Antle, Jillian Warren, Aaron May, Min Fan, and Anna Macaranas. 2015. What kind of world do you want to live in? Positive interdependence and collaborative processes in the tangible tabletop land-use planning game Youtopia. In Proceedings of The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2015. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.[ISLS]., Gothenburg, Sweden. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/413

[69]

Anna Xambó, Eva Hornecker, Paul Marshall, Sergi Jordà, Chris Dobbyn, and Robin Laney. 2013. Let’s Jam the Reactable: Peer Learning during Musical Improvisation with a Tabletop Tangible Interface. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 6, Article 36 (Dec. 2013), 34 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2530541

Digital Library

Cited By

Ishchuk VDižo JBlatnický MLovska AMolnár D(2024)A Steam Locomotive Miniature Model DesignLOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics10.2478/logi-2024-000615:1(61-72)Online publication date: 14-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.2478/logi-2024-0006
Sayffaerth CRasch JMüller F(2024)“Tele” Me More: Using Telepresence Charades to Connect Strangers and Exhibits in Different MuseumsExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650834(1-8)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650834
Elkhuizen WLove JParisi SKarana E(2024)On the Role of Materials Experience for Novel Interactions with Digital Representations of Historical Pop-up and Movable BooksProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642142(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642142
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Fighting Fires and Powering Steam Locomotives: Distribution of Control and Its Role in Social Interaction at Tangible Interactive Museum Exhibits
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Engaging families around museum exhibits: comparing tangible and multi-touch interfaces
IDC '20: Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference

Over the last decade, large multitouch displays have become commonplace in museums and other public spaces. While there is preliminary evidence that exhibits based on tangible technologies can be more attractive and engaging for visitors than displays ...
Smart Objects and Replicas: A Survey of Tangible and Embodied Interactions in Museums and Cultural Heritage Sites
Tangible and embodied interactions are areas of research within HCI and interaction design. They refer to a way in which interacting with computer systems is closer to the way we interact with the real world. Instead of using devices such as a computer or ...
Dimensions of indigenous heritage discourse and the use of technologies of display in an ethnographic exhibition: a case study of the "Song for the Horse Nation" exhibition (National Museum of the American Indian, New York)
iConference '12: Proceedings of the 2012 iConference

This poster reports on a study of an ethnographic exhibition put together by three indigenous curators and hosted by the National Museum of the American Indian in New York ("A Song for the Horse Nation"). Its aim is to contribute to the scarce Library ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2021

10862 pages

ISBN:9781450380966

DOI:10.1145/3411764

General Chairs:
Yoshifumi Kitamura
Tohoku University, Japan
,
Aaron Quigley
University of New South Wales, Australia
,
Program Chairs:
Katherine Isbister
University of California Santa Cruz, USA
,
Takeo Igarashi
The University of Tokyo, Japan
,
Publications Chairs:
Pernille Bjørn
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Steven Drucker
Microsoft Research, USA

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 May 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

CHI '21

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '21: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 8 - 13, 2021

Yokohama, Japan

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

9
Total Citations
View Citations
514
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)99
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)35

Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ishchuk VDižo JBlatnický MLovska AMolnár D(2024)A Steam Locomotive Miniature Model DesignLOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics10.2478/logi-2024-000615:1(61-72)Online publication date: 14-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.2478/logi-2024-0006
Sayffaerth CRasch JMüller F(2024)“Tele” Me More: Using Telepresence Charades to Connect Strangers and Exhibits in Different MuseumsExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650834(1-8)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650834
Elkhuizen WLove JParisi SKarana E(2024)On the Role of Materials Experience for Novel Interactions with Digital Representations of Historical Pop-up and Movable BooksProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642142(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642142
Xia WSun GLi TChang BTang JZhang GLiang R(2024)Video Visualization and Visual Analytics: A Task-Based and Application- Driven InvestigationIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology10.1109/TCSVT.2024.342340234:11(11316-11339)Online publication date: Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2024.3423402
Czech E(2023)Applying Technology in a Hybrid-Fashion to Create Dementia-Inclusive Community SpacesACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing10.1145/3584732.3584733(1-1)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3584732.3584733
Nikolakopoulou VVosinakis SNikopoulos GStavrakis MPolitopoulos NFragkedis LKoutsabasis P(2022)Design and User Experience of a Hybrid Mixed Reality Installation that Promotes Tinian Marble Crafts HeritageJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/352274315:4(1-21)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3522743
Czech E(2022)Applying Technology in a Hybrid-Fashion to Create Dementia-Inclusive Community SpacesProceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3517428.3550412(1-6)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3517428.3550412
Czech EMarshall PMetatla O(2022)“Just like meeting in person” - Examination of interdependencies in dementia-friendly virtual activities.Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3517428.3544815(1-15)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3517428.3544815
Kumar VBerland MLyons LPinzur B(2022)SCAMP: an analytical framework for examining flexible social playfulness around interactive museum exhibitsInteractive Learning Environments10.1080/10494820.2022.2153148(1-16)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2153148

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten