ABSTRACT
Many serious games are most effective when played regularly; however, little is known about how individual game elements support player adherence over time. This work draws on evidence from existing frameworks and game design theories as well as from the design of casual games to investigate how individual game mechanics affect player attrition in a serious game. We implemented a math-learning game in which we could individually layer various game mechanics, and over the course of 3 weeks, 99 participants played one of six versions: Baseline, Rewards, Novelty, Completion, Waiting, or Blocking. We compared the game versions by analyzing the players’ performance as well as behaviour. Using survival analysis, we identified that the addition of Completion and Blocking mechanics facilitated the strongest sustained engagement. These findings are congruent with existing theories of player experience and promote the development of guidelines on designing for sustained engagement in serious games.
Supplemental Material
- Vero Vanden Abeele, Katta Spiel, Lennart Nacke, Daniel Johnson, and Kathrin Gerling. 2020. Development and Validation of the Player Experience Inventory: A Scale to Measure Player Experiences at the Level of Functional and Psychosocial Consequences. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 135 (March 2020), 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.102370Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clark C. Abt. 1970. Serious Games. University Press of America, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
- Dmitry Alexandrovsky, Maximilian Achim Friehs, Max V. Birk, Rowan K. Yates, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2019. Game Dynamics That Support Snacking, Not Feasting. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, Barcelona Spain, 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347151Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maximilian Altmeyer, Kathrin Dernbecher, Vladislav Hnatovskiy, Marc Schubhan, Pascal Lessel, and Antonio Krüger. 2019. Gamified Ads: Bridging the Gap Between User Enjoyment and the Effectiveness of Online Ads. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’19. ACM Press, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300412Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chris Mark Bateman and Richard Boon. 2006. 21st Century Game Design. Charles River Media, Hingham, Mass.Google Scholar
- Max V. Birk, Cheralyn Atkins, Jason T. Bowey, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2016. Fostering Intrinsic Motivation Through Avatar Identification in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2982–2995. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858062Google ScholarDigital Library
- Max V. Birk, Maximilian A. Friehs, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2017. Age-Based Preferences and Player Experience: A Crowdsourced Cross-Sectional Study. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1145/3116595.3116608Google ScholarDigital Library
- Max Valentin Birk and Regan Lee Mandryk. 2019. Improving the Efficacy of Cognitive Training for Digital Mental Health Interventions Through Avatar Customization: Crowdsourced Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21, 1 (Jan. 2019), e10133. https://doi.org/10.2196/10133Google ScholarCross Ref
- Max V. Birk, Regan L. Mandryk, and Cheralyn Atkins. 2016. The Motivational Push of Games: The Interplay of Intrinsic Motivation and External Rewards in Games for Training. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968091Google ScholarDigital Library
- J M. Bland and D. G Altman. 1998. Statistics Notes: Survival Probabilities (the Kaplan-Meier Method). BMJ 317, 7172 (Dec. 1998), 1572–1580. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7172.1572Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jason T Bowey, Maximilian A Friehs, and Regan L Mandryk. 2019. Red or Blue Pill: Fostering Identification and Transportation through Dialogue Choices in RPGs. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. ACM, San Luis Obispo California, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3337722.3337734Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elizabeth A. Boyle, Thomas M. Connolly, Thomas Hainey, and James M. Boyle. 2012. Engagement in Digital Entertainment Games: A Systematic Review. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 3 (May 2012), 771–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.020Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew D. Carlo, Reza Hosseini Ghomi, Brenna N. Renn, Michael A. Strong, and Patricia A. Areán. 2020. Assessment of Real-World Use of Behavioral Health Mobile Applications by a Novel Stickiness Metric. JAMA Network Open 3, 8 (Aug. 2020), e2011978. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11978Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Collett. 2015. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. CRC press, 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Sute 300.Google Scholar
- D. R. Cox. 1972. Regression Models and Life-Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 34, 2(1972), 187–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
- K. R. Daffner, M. M. Mesulam, L. F. Scinto, L. G. Cohen, B. P. Kennedy, W. C. West, and P. J. Holcomb. 1998. Regulation of Attention to Novel Stimuli by Frontal Lobes: An Event-Related Potential Study. Neuroreport 9, 5 (March 1998), 787–791.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frederik De Grove, Johannes Breuer, Vivian Hsueh Hua Chen, Thorsten Quandt, Rabindra Ratan, and Jan Van Looy. 2017. Validating the Digital Games Motivation Scale for Comparative Research Between Countries. Communication Research Reports 34, 1 (Jan. 2017), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2016.1250070Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter F. Delaney, Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen, and Arie Spirgel. 2010. Spacing and Testing Effects. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Brian H. Ross (Ed.). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 53. Academic Press, San Diego, CA; London, 63–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(10)53003-2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Simon Demediuk, Alexandra Murrin, David Bulger, Michael Hitchens, Anders Drachen, William L. Raffe, and Marco Tamassia. 2018. Player Retention in League of Legends: A Study Using Survival Analysis. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference on - ACSW ’18. ACM Press, Brisband, Queensland, Australia, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3167918.3167937Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Denny. 2013. The Effect of Virtual Achievements on Student Engagement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’13. ACM Press, Paris, France, 763. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470763Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Denny, Fiona McDonald, Ruth Empson, Philip Kelly, and Andrew Petersen. 2018. Empirical Support for a Causal Relationship Between Gamification and Learning Outcomes. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’18. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173885Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining ”Gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments(MindTrek ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anders Drachen and Alessandro Canossa. 2009. Towards Gameplay Analysis via Gameplay Metrics. In Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era on - MindTrek ’09. ACM Press, Tampere, Finland, 202. https://doi.org/10.1145/1621841.1621878Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anders Drachen, Rafet Sifa, Christian Bauckhage, and Christian Thurau. 2012. Guns, Swords and Data: Clustering of Player Behavior in Computer Games in the Wild. In 2012 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG). IEEE, Granada, Spain, 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1109/cig.2012.6374152Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gunther Eysenbach. 2005. The Law of Attrition. Journal of Medical Internet Research 7, 1 (March 2005), e11. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. L. Fantz. 1964. VISUAL EXPERIENCE IN INFANTS: DECREASED ATTENTION TO FAMILIAR PATTERNS RELATIVE TO NOVEL ONES. Science (New York, N.Y.) 146, 3644 (Oct. 1964), 668–670.Google Scholar
- Tim Fields. 2014. Mobile & Social Game Design: Monetization Methods and Mechanics (second editioned.). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
- Tim Fields, Brandon Cotton, and Brandon Cotton. 2011. Social Game Design: Monetization Methods and Mechanics (first ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780240817675Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonathan Frome. 2007. Eight Ways Videogames Generate Emotion.. In Digra Conference. Digital Games Research Association, Tokyo Japan, 4.Google Scholar
- Julian Frommel, Fabian Fischbach, Katja Rogers, and Michael Weber. 2018. Emotion-Based Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment Using Parameterized Difficulty and Self-Reports of Emotion. In The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Extended Abstracts - CHI PLAY ’18. ACM Press, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242682Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julian Frommel, Valentin Sagl, Ansgar E. Depping, Colby Johanson, Matthew K. Miller, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2020. Recognizing Affiliation: Using Behavioural Traces to Predict the Quality of Social Interactions in Online Games. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376446Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julian Frommel, Claudia Schrader, and Michael Weber. 2018. Towards Emotion-Based Adaptive Games: Emotion Recognition Via Input and Performance Features. In The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Extended Abstracts - CHI PLAY ’18. ACM Press, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242672Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tracy Fullerton. 2014. Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games, Third Edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paul A. Games and John F. Howell. 1976. Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures with Unequal N’s and/or Variances: A Monte Carlo Study. Journal of Educational Statistics 1, 2 (June 1976), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986001002113Google ScholarCross Ref
- Riot Games. 2009. League of Legends.Google Scholar
- Rosemary Garris, Robert Ahlers, and James E. Driskell. 2002. Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model. Simulation & Gaming 33, 4 (Dec. 2002), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kathrin Maria Gerling, Frank Paul Schulte, Jan Smeddinck, and Maic Masuch. 2012. Game Design for Older Adults: Effects of Age-Related Changes on Structural Elements of Digital Games. In Entertainment Computing - ICEC 2012(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Marc Herrlich, Rainer Malaka, and Maic Masuch (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Bremen, Germany, 235–242.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kiel M Gilleade and Alan Dix. 2004. Using Frustration in the Design of Adaptive Videogames. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology - ACE ’04. ACM Press, Singapore, 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1145/1067343.1067372Google ScholarDigital Library
- Minas Gjoka, Michael Sirivianos, Athina Markopoulou, and Xiaowei Yang. 2008. Poking Facebook: Characterization of Osn Applications. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Online Social Networks - WOSP ’08. ACM Press, Seattle, WA, USA, 31. https://doi.org/10.1145/1397735.1397743Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lewis R. Goldberg. 1992. The Development of Markers for the Big-Five Factor Structure.Psychological Assessment 4, 1 (1992), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frederic Guay, Robert J Vallerand, and Celine Blanchard. 2001. On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion 24 (2001), 40.Google Scholar
- Timothy D Hackenberg. 2009. TOKEN REINFORCEMENT: A REVIEW AND ANALYSIS. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 91, 2 (March 2009), 257–286. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2009.91-257Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fabian Hadiji, Rafet Sifa, Anders Drachen, Christian Thurau, Kristian Kersting, and Christian Bauckhage. 2014. Predicting Player Churn in the Wild. In 2014 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games. IEEE, Dortmund, Germany, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/cig.2014.6932876Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stuart Hallifax, Audrey Serna, Jean-Charles Marty, Guillaume Lavoué, and Elise Lavoué. 2019. Factors to Consider for Tailored Gamification. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, Barcelona Spain, 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347167Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frank E. Harrell, Kerry L. Lee, and Daniel B. Mark. 2005. Prognostic/Clinical Prediction Models: Multivariable Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors. In Tutorials in Biostatistics, R. B. D’Agostino (Ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470023678.ch2b(i)Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robin Hunicke. 2005. The Case for Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment in Games. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology - ACE ’05. ACM Press, Valencia, Spain, 429–433. https://doi.org/10.1145/1178477.1178573Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roslina Ibrahim and Azizah Jaafar. 2009. Educational Games (EG) Design Framework: Combination of Game Design, Pedagogy and Content Modeling. In 2009 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics. IEEE, Bangi, Malaysia, 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI.2009.5254771Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jaakko Iisalo and Rovio Entertainment Ltd.2009. Angry Birds. Game [iOS, Windows Phone 7, Windows Phone 8, bada, Maemo, webOS, Android, Symbian³, Nintendo 3DS, Windows, Mac, Xbox 360, PS3, PS4, PSP, BlackBerry Tablet OS, Blackberry 10].Google Scholar
- K Jackson and T D Hackenberg. 1996. Token Reinforcement, Choice, and Self-Control in Pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 66, 1 (July 1996), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1996.66-29Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stephen P Jenkins. 2005. Survival Analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK 42 (2005), 54–56.Google Scholar
- W. A. Johnston, K. J. Hawley, S. H. Plewe, J. M. Elliott, and M. J. DeWitt. 1990. Attention Capture by Novel Stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 119, 4 (Dec. 1990), 397–411.Google Scholar
- Bill Jolley, Richard Mizerski, and Doina Olaru. 2006. How Habit and Satisfaction Affects Player Retention for Online Gambling. Journal of Business Research 59, 6 (June 2006), 770–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.017Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edward L Kaplan and Paul Meier. 1958. Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations. Journal of the American statistical association 53, 282(1958), 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Karsh and B. Eitam. 2015. I Control Therefore I Do: Judgments of Agency Influence Action Selection. Cognition 138 (May 2015), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Saskia M Kelders, Robin N Kok, Hans C Ossebaard, and Julia EWC Van Gemert-Pijnen. 2012. Persuasive System Design Does Matter: A Systematic Review of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research 14, 6 (Nov. 2012), e152. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2104Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jun H. Kim, Daniel V. Gunn, Eric Schuh, Bruce Phillips, Randy J. Pagulayan, and Dennis Wixon. 2008. Tracking Real-Time User Experience (TRUE): A Comprehensive Instrumentation Solution for Complex Systems. In Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’08. ACM Press, Florence, Italy, 443. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357126Google ScholarDigital Library
- Madison Klarkowski, Daniel Johnson, Peta Wyeth, Cody Phillips, and Simon Smith. 2018. Don’t Sweat the Small Stuff: The Effect of Challenge-Skill Manipulation on Electrodermal Activity. In The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Extended Abstracts - CHI PLAY ’18. ACM Press, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242714Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard N. Landers and Rachel C. Callan. 2011. Casual Social Games as Serious Games: The Psychology of Gamification in Undergraduate Education and Employee Training. In Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, Minhua Ma, Andreas Oikonomou, and Lakhmi C. Jain(Eds.). Springer London, London, 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9_20Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emily G. Lattie, Stephen M. Schueller, Elizabeth Sargent, Colleen Stiles-Shields, Kathryn Noth Tomasino, Marya E. Corden, Mark Begale, Chris J. Karr, and David C. Mohr. 2016. Uptake and Usage of IntelliCare: A Publicly Available Suite of Mental Health and Well-Being Apps. Internet Interventions 4 (May 2016), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2016.06.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lauren A. Leotti and Mauricio R. Delgado. 2011. The Inherent Reward of Choice. Psychological Science 22, 10 (Oct. 2011), 1310–1318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417005Google ScholarCross Ref
- Conor Linehan, Ben Kirman, Shaun Lawson, and Gail Chan. 2011. Practical, Appropriate, Empirically-Validated Guidelines for Designing Educational Games. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’11. ACM Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979229Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hangcheng Liu. 2015. Comparing Welch’s ANOVA, a Kruskal-Wallis Test and Traditional ANOVA in Case of Heterogeneity of Variance. Ph.D. Dissertation. VCU Libraries. https://doi.org/10.25772/BWFP-YE95Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jim Lumsden, Elizabeth A Edwards, Natalia S Lawrence, David Coyle, and Marcus R Munafò. 2016. Gamification of Cognitive Assessment and Cognitive Training: A Systematic Review of Applications and Efficacy. JMIR Serious Games 4, 2 (July 2016), e11. https://doi.org/10.2196/games.5888Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thomas W. Malone. 1980. What Makes Things Fun to Learn? Heuristics for Designing Instructional Computer Games. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL Symposium and the First SIGPC Symposium on Small Systems(SIGSMALL ’80). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1145/800088.802839Google ScholarDigital Library
- Regan Lee Mandryk and Max Valentin Birk. 2017. Toward Game-Based Digital Mental Health Interventions: Player Habits and Preferences. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19, 4 (2017), e128. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6906Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Mantel. 1966. Evaluation of Survival Data and Two New Rank Order Statistics Arising in Its Consideration. Cancer Chemotherapy Reports 50, 3 (March 1966), 163–170.Google Scholar
- T. Mäntylä and T. Sgaramella. 1997. Interrupting Intentions: Zeigarnik-like Effects in Prospective Memory. Psychological Research 60, 3 (1997), 192–199.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrzej Marczewski. 2013. The Intrinsic Motivation RAMP. https://www.gamified.uk/gamification-framework/the-intrinsic-motivation-ramp/.Google Scholar
- Andrzej Marczewski. 2015. User Types HEXAD. In Even Ninja Monkeys Like to Play. Gamified UK, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
- Edward McAuley, Terry Duncan, and Vance V. Tammen. 1989. Psychometric Properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a Competitive Sport Setting: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 60, 1 (March 1989), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413Google ScholarCross Ref
- David C McClelland. 1987. Human Motivation(first ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878289Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elisa D Mekler, Florian Brühlmann, Klaus Opwis, and Alexandre N Tuch. 2013. Do Points, Levels and Leaderboards Harm Intrinsic Motivation?: An Empirical Analysis of Common Gamification Elements. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications. ACM, ACM, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/2583008.2583017Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elisa D. Mekler, Florian Brühlmann, Alexandre N. Tuch, and Klaus Opwis. 2017. Towards Understanding the Effects of Individual Gamification Elements on Intrinsic Motivation and Performance. Computers in Human Behavior 71 (June 2017), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.048Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haim Mendelson and Ken Moon. 2018. Modeling Success and Engagement for the App Economy. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW ’18. ACM Press, Lyon, France, 569–578. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186123Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rupert G Miller Jr. 2011. Survival Analysis. Vol. 66. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, US.Google Scholar
- Walter Mischel, Ebbe B. Ebbesen, and Antonette Raskoff Zeiss. 1972. Cognitive and Attentional Mechanisms in Delay of Gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21, 2(1972), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032198Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alberto Mora, Daniel Riera, Carina Gonzalez, and Joan Arnedo-Moreno. 2015. A Literature Review of Gamification Design Frameworks. In Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-Games), 2015 7th International Conference On. IEEE, Skövde, Sweden, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/VS-GAMES.2015.7295760Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert R. Morris, Stephen M. Schueller, and Rosalind W. Picard. 2015. Efficacy of a Web-Based, Crowdsourced Peer-To-Peer Cognitive Reappraisal Platform for Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 17, 3 (2015), e72. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4167Google ScholarCross Ref
- Isabel Briggs Myers. 1962. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual (1962).Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto. https://doi.org/10.1037/14404-000Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lennart Nacke and Anders Drachen. 2011. Towards a Framework of Player Experience Research. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Evaluating Player Experience in Games at FDG, Vol. 11. ACM, Bordeaux, France, 6.Google Scholar
- Rita Orji, Julita Vassileva, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2014. Modeling the Efficacy of Persuasive Strategies for Different Gamer Types in Serious Games for Health. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 24, 5 (Dec. 2014), 453–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-014-9149-8Google ScholarDigital Library
- Antti Oulasvirta, Sakari Tamminen, Virpi Roto, and Jaana Kuorelahti. 2005. Interaction in 4-Second Bursts: The Fragmented Nature of Attentional Resources in Mobile HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’05). ACM, Portland, Oregon, USA, 919–928. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055101Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johannes Pfau, Jan David Smeddinck, and Rainer Malaka. 2018. Towards Deep Player Behavior Models in MMORPGs. In The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Extended Abstracts - CHI PLAY ’18. ACM Press, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242706Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johannes Pfau, Jan David Smeddinck, and Rainer Malaka. 2020. Enemy Within: Long-Term Motivation Effects of Deep Player Behavior Models for Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376423Google ScholarDigital Library
- Susanne Poeller, Nicola Baumann, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2020. Power Play: How the Need to Empower or Overpower Other Players Predicts Preferences in League of Legends. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376193Google ScholarDigital Library
- Susanne Poeller, Max V. Birk, Nicola Baumann, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2018. Let Me Be Implicit: Using Motive Disposition Theory to Predict and Explain Behaviour in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’18. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173764Google ScholarDigital Library
- Till Riemer. 2015. Agent-Based Procedural Quest Generation for a Role-Playing Game. Master Thesis. IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
- David Robinson and Victoria Bellotti. 2013. A Preliminary Taxonomy of Gamification Elements for Varying Anticipated Commitment. In Proc. ACM CHI 2013 Workshop on Designing Gamification: Creating Gameful and Playful Experiences. ACM, Paris, France, 6.Google Scholar
- Harry T Roman. 2004. Why Math Is so Important. Tech Directions 63, 10 (2004), 16.Google Scholar
- Richard M. Ryan. 1982. Control and Information in the Intrapersonal Sphere: An Extension of Cognitive Evaluation Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43, 3(1982), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci. 2000. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American psychologist 55, 1 (2000), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard M. Ryan, C. Scott Rigby, and Andrew Przybylski. 2006. The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. Motivation and Emotion 30, 4 (Nov. 2006), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Sailer and Lisa Homner. 2020. The Gamification of Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review 32, 1 (March 2020), 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-wGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Katta Spiel, Oliver L. Haimson, Foad Hamidi, and Stacy M. Branham. 2020. HCI Guidelines for Gender Equity and Inclusivity.Google Scholar
- Florian Schimanke, Robert Mertens, and Ute Schmid. 2017. Spaced Repetition in Mobile Learning Games - A Cure to Bulimic Learning?. In E-Learn World Conference on E-Learning. ERIC, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 11.Google Scholar
- David Schoenfeld. 1981. The Asymptotic Properties of Nonparametric Tests for Comparing Survival Distributions. Biometrika 68, 1 (1981), 316–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/68.1.316Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rafet Sifa, Christian Bauckhage, and Anders Drachen. 2014. The Playtime Principle: Large-Scale Cross-Games Interest Modeling. In 2014 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games. IEEE, Dortmund, Germany, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/cig.2014.6932906Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rafet Sifa, Anders Drachen, Christian Bauckhage, Christian Thurau, and Alessandro Canossa. 2013. Behavior Evolution in Tomb Raider Underworld. In 2013 IEEE Conference on Computational Inteligence in Games (CIG). IEEE, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/cig.2013.6633637Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. F. Skinner. 1938. The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis. Appleton-Century, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
- B. F. Skinner. 1948. ’Superstition’ in the Pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology 38, 2 (1948), 168–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055873Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard P. Smith. 1981. Boredom: A Review. Human Factors 23, 3 (1981), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088102300308Google ScholarCross Ref
- Minzhu Song and Sujing Zhang. 2008. EFM: A Model for Educational Game Design. In Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment(Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Nanjing, China, 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69736-7_54Google ScholarDigital Library
- Susana Ruiz and interFUEL, LLC. 2006. Darfur Is Dying. Game [Web/Online].Google Scholar
- Christine J. Syrek, Oliver Weigelt, Corinna Peifer, and Conny H. Antoni. 2017. Zeigarnik’s Sleepless Nights: How Unfinished Tasks at the End of the Week Impair Employee Sleep on the Weekend through Rumination. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 22, 2 (April 2017), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000031Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gustavo F. Tondello and Lennart E. Nacke. 2019. Player Characteristics and Video Game Preferences. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, Barcelona Spain, 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347185Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gustavo F. Tondello, Rina R. Wehbe, Lisa Diamond, Marc Busch, Andrzej Marczewski, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2016. The Gamification User Types Hexad Scale. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, Austin Texas USA, 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968082Google ScholarDigital Library
- April Tyack and Elisa D. Mekler. 2020. Self-Determination Theory in HCI Games Research: Current Uses and Open Questions. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376723Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anant Vaibhav and Pooja Gupta. 2014. Gamification of MOOCs for Increasing User Engagement. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE). IEEE, Patiala, India, 290–295. https://doi.org/10.1109/mite.2014.7020290Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rajan Vaish, Keith Wyngarden, Jingshu Chen, Brandon Cheung, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2014. Twitch Crowdsourcing: Crowd Contributions in Short Bursts of Time. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’14). ACM, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 3645–3654. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556996Google ScholarDigital Library
- Markus Viljanen, Antti Airola, Tapio Pahikkala, and Jukka Heikkonen. 2016. Modelling User Retention in Mobile Games. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG). IEEE, Santorini, Greece, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/cig.2016.7860393Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luis von Ahn. 2008. Human Computation. In 2008 IEEE 24th International Conference on Data Engineering. IEEE, Cancun, Mexico, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/icde.2008.4497403Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ben Weber, Michael John, Michael Mateas, and Arnav Jhala. 2011. Modeling Player Retention in Madden NFL 11. In IAAI, Vol. Twenty-Third IAAI Conference. AAAI Press, San Francisco, CA, USA, 6.Google Scholar
- B. L. Welch. 1951. On the Comparison of Several Mean Values: An Alternative Approach. Biometrika 38, 3/4 (Dec. 1951), 330. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332579Google ScholarCross Ref
- WHO. 2018. ICD-11 Gaming Disorder.Google Scholar
- Georgios N. Yannakakis, Pieter Spronck, Daniele Loiacono, and Elisabeth André. 2013. Player Modeling. Artificial and computational intelligence in games 6 (2013), 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.4230/DFU.VOL6.12191.45Google ScholarCross Ref
- José P Zagal, Staffan Björk, and Chris Lewis. 2013. Dark Patterns in the Design of Games. In FDG 2013(Foundations of Digital Games Conference, FDG 2013). ACM, Crete, Greece, 8.Google Scholar
- Daowen Zhang and Hui Quan. 2009. Power and Sample Size Calculation for Log-Rank Test with a Time Lag in Treatment Effect. Statistics in Medicine 28, 5 (Feb. 2009), 864–879. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3501Google ScholarCross Ref
- Georg Zoeller. 2013. Game Development Telemetry in Production. In Game Analytics, Magy Seif El-Nasr, Anders Drachen, and Alessandro Canossa(Eds.). Springer London, London, 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4769-5_7Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Serious Snacking: A Survival Analysis of how Snacking Mechanics Affect Attrition in a Mobile Serious Game
Recommendations
Game Dynamics that Support Snacking, not Feasting
CHI PLAY '19: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in PlayPlayer experience research tends to focus on immersive games that draw us into a single play session for hours; however, for casual games played on mobile devices, a pattern of brief daily interaction---called snacking ---may be most profitable for ...
From Classes to Mechanics: Player Type Driven Persuasive Game Development
CHI PLAY '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in PlayResearch findings indicate that player types may serve as a theoretical basis for the design of persuasive games. However, until now no proof of concept is available that shows the applicability of this approach for tailoring games to player ...
Comments