skip to main content
10.1145/3415048.3415049acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesprisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Accurate Iris Segmentation for at-a-distance Acquired Iris/Face Images under Less Constrained Environment

Published:04 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Iris recognition for at-a-distance acquired iris images under less constrained environment has shown to be challenging due to highly imaging variations such as reflections, motion blur, occlusions etc. This poses challenges for conventional gradient-based iris segmentation methods which are essentially developed to work on high quality iris images acquired in a controlled environment. In this work, we propose an effective encoder-decoder Deep Convolutional Neural Network which can be trained end-to-end to perform iris segmentation for distantly acquired iris/face images. More specifically, the proposed approach is motivated by the recent state-of-the-art semantic segmentation approach -- DeepLabv3/3+. The encoder module adapts the ResNet-50 as base network and extended with additional blocks constructed using multi-grid atrous convolution, and Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling to capture multi-scale features, which can better accommodate the segmentation of iris at different scales. To facilitate recovering of the spatial information, refinement module is introduced in the decoder module. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach on two public datasets, i.e., UBIRIS.v2 and FRGC, which achieves average improvement of 37.42% and 48.9%, respectively. The trained model is made publicly available at https://gitlab.com/cwtan501/iris_segmentation to encourage reproducible of the reported results.

References

  1. Aadhaar Authentication: 2016. https://www.uidai.gov.in/authentication/authentication-overview/authentication-en.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowyer, K.W. et al. 2008. Image understanding for iris biometrics: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 110, 2 (2008), 281--307. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2007.08.005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Daugman, J. 2015. Iris Recognition at Airports and Border Crossings. Encyclopedia of Biometrics. 998--1004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jain, A.K. and Kumar, A. 2012. Biometric Recognition: An Overview. 49--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Wildes, R.P. 1997. Iris recognition: An emerging biometrie technology. Proceedings of the IEEE. 85, 9 (1997), 1348--1363. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/5.628669.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Soft Computing and Image Analysis Lab: http://socia-lab.di.ubi.pt/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Proença, H. et al. 2010. The UBIRIS.v2: A database of visible wavelength iris images captured on-the-move and at-a-distance. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 32, 8 (2010), 1529--1535. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2009.66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Proença, H. and Alexandre, L.A. 2005. UBIRIS: A noisy iris image database. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (2005), 970--977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kumar, A. and Passi, A. 2010. Comparison and combination of iris matchers for reliable personal authentication. Pattern Recognition. 43, 3 (2010), 1016--1026. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2009.08.016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Daugman, J. 2004. How Iris Recognition Works. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology. 14, 1 (2004), 21--30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2003.818350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Daugman, J. 2007. New methods in iris recognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics. 37, 5 (2007), 1167--1175. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2007.903540.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. He, Z. et al. 2009. Toward accurate and fast iris segmentation for iris biometrics. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 31, 9 (2009), 1670--1684. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2008.183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Chen, L.-C. et al. 2018. Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation Liang-Chieh. arXiv.org. (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1159/000018039.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, L.C. et al. 2018. DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 40, 4 (2018), 834--848. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2699184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Chen, L.C. et al. 2018. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (2018), 833--851.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. He, K. et al. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Phillips, P.J. et al. 2005. Overview of the face recognition grand challenge. Proceedings - 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2005 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Tan, C.W. and Kumar, A. 2013. Towards online iris and periocular recognition under relaxed imaging constraints. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 22, 10 (2013), 3751--3765. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2013.2260165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Zhao, Z. and Kumar, A. 2015. An accurate iris segmentation framework under relaxed imaging constraints using total variation model. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Proença, H. 2010. Iris recognition: On the segmentation of degraded images acquired in the visible wavelength. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. (2010). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2009.140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. NICE.I Evaluation: http://nice1.di.ubi.pt/evaluation.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Accurate Iris Segmentation for at-a-distance Acquired Iris/Face Images under Less Constrained Environment

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          PRIS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Intelligent Systems
          July 2020
          136 pages
          ISBN:9781450387699
          DOI:10.1145/3415048

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          © 2020 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 September 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader