ABSTRACT
The next wave of drone applications is moving from repeatable, single-drone activities such as evaluating propagation environments to team-based, multi-drone objectives such as drone-based emergency services. In parallel, testbeds have sought to evaluate emerging concepts such as highly-directional and distributed wireless communications. However, there is a lack of intersection between the two works to characterize the impact of the drone body, antenna placement, swarm topologies, and multi-dimensional connectivity needs that require in-flight experimentation with a surrounding testbed infrastructure. In this work, we design a Multi-Dimensional Drone Communications Infrastructure (MuDDI) to capture complex spatial wireless channel relationships that drone links experience as applications scale from single-drone to swarm-level networks within a shared three-dimensional space. Driven by the challenges of outdoor experimentation, we identify the need for a highly-controlled indoor environment where external factors can be mitigated. To do so, we first build an open-source drone platform to provide programmable control with visibility into the internal flight control system and sensors enabling specialized coordination and accurate repeatable positioning within the isolated environment. We then design a wireless data acquisition system and integrate distributed software defined radios (SDRs) in order to inspect multi-dimensional wireless behavior from the surrounding area. We achieve and demonstrate the value of measurement perspectives from diverse altitudes and spatial locations with the same notion of time. Finally, we demonstrate how multi-dimensional models from experimental measurements can be implemented to simulate multi-drone networks on a practical scale.
- UAS by the numbers. https://www.faa.gov/uas/resources/by_the_numbers/, Feb. 2020.Google Scholar
- FAA aerospace forecast fiscal years 2019--2039. https://www.faa.gov/data_research/aviation/aerospace_forecasts/media/FY2019-39_FAA_Aerospace_Forecast.pdf, 2019.Google Scholar
- Vijaya Yajnanarayana, Y.-P. Eric Wang, Shiwei Gao, Siva D. Muruganathan, and Xingqin Lin. Interference mitigation methods for unmanned aerial vehicles served by cellular networks. CoRR, abs/1802.00223, 2018.Google Scholar
- Drones and networks: Ensuring safe and secure operations, Dec. 2019.Google Scholar
- Xingqin Lin, Richard Wiren, Sebastian Euler, Arvi Sadam, Helka-Liina Maattanen, Siva Muruganathan, Shiwei Gao, Y-P Eric Wang, Juhani Kauppi, Zhenhua Zou, et al. Mobile network-connected drones: Field trials, simulations, and design insights. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 14(3):115--125, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mohammad Mozaffari, Walid Saad, Mehdi Bennis, and Merouane Debbah. Mobile internet of things: Can UAVs provide an energy-efficient mobile architecture?, Jul. 2016.Google Scholar
- M. Valenti, B. Bethke, D. Dale, A. Frank, J. McGrew, S. Ahrens, J. P. How, and J. Vian. The MIT indoor multi-vehicle flight testbed. In Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 2758--2759, Apr. 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Michael, D. Mellinger, Q. Lindsey, and V. Kumar. The GRASP multiple micro-UAV testbed. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine, 17(3):56--65, Sep. 2010.Google Scholar
- J. P. How, B. Behihke, A. Frank, D. Dale, and J. Vian. Real-time indoor autonomous vehicle test environment. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 28(2):51--64, Apr. 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Evcs en Yanmaz, Robert Kuschnig, and Christian Bettstetter. Achieving air-ground communications in 802.11 networks with three-dimensional aerial mobility. In 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, pages 120--124. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Cheng, P. Hsiao, H. T. Kung, and D. Vlah. Performance measurement of 802.11a wireless links from uav to ground nodes with various antenna orientations. In Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, pages 303--308, Oct. 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Platforms for Advanced Wireless Research. https://advancedwireless.org/, Mar. 2020.Google Scholar
- R. Lim, F. Ferrari, M. Zimmerling, C. Walser, P. Sommer, and J. Beutel. Flocklab: A testbed for distributed, synchronized tracing and profiling of wireless embedded systems. In 2013 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), pages 153--165, Apr. 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Vieira, S. Malkowsky, K. Nieman, Z. Miers, N. Kundargi, L. Liu, I. Wong, V. Öwall, O. Edfors, and F. Tufvesson. A flexible 100-antenna testbed for massive MIMO. In 2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), pages 287--293, Dec. 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Raychaudhuri, I. Seskar, M. Ott, S. Ganu, K. Ramachandran, H. Kremo, R. Siracusa, H. Liu, and M. Singh. Overview of the ORBIT radio grid testbed for evaluation of next-generation wireless network protocols. In IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2005, volume 3, pages 1664--1669 Vol. 3, Mar. 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Omid Abari, Hariharan Rahul, Dina Katabi, and Mondira Pant. Airshare: Distributed coherent transmission made seamless. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pages 1742--1750. IEEE, 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Badi, J. Wensowitch, D. Rajan, and J. Camp. Experimental evaluation of antenna polarization and elevation effects on drone communications. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, pages 211--220, 2019. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Rice and M. Jensen. Multipath propagation for helicopter-to-ground mimo links. In 2011 - MILCOM 2011 Military Communications Conference, pages 447--452, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. J. Willink, C. C. Squires, G. W. K. Colman, and M. T. Muccio. Measurement and characterization of low-altitude air-to-ground mimo channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(4):2637--2648, 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Zhou, C. Tao, and L. Liu. LTE-assisted multi-link MIMO channel characterization for high-speed train communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(3):2044--2051, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matrice 100 specs. https://www.dji.com/matrice100/info, Mar. 2020.Google Scholar
- Hskt technology specifications. https://www.indotraq.com/, Mar. 2020.Google Scholar
- White rabbit switch. https://sevensols.com/index.php/products/white-rabbit-switch/.Google Scholar
- E. Hamed, H. Rahul, M. Abdelghany, and D. Katabi. Real-time distributed mimo systems. In 2016 Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Conferece, page 412--425, 2106. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Corum, J. D. Bonior, R. C. Qiu, N. Guo, and Z. Hu. Evaluation of phase error in a software-defined radio network testbed. In 2012 Proceedings of IEEE Southeastcon, pages 1--4, Mar. 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Neel Pandeya. Synchronization and MIMO capability with USRP devices. https://kb.ettus.com/Synchronization_and_MIMO_Capability_with_USRP_Devices, May 2016.Google Scholar
- W. Khawaja, O. Ozdemir, F. Erden, I. Guvenc, and D. W. Matolak. UWB air-to-ground propagation channel measurements and modeling using UAVs. In 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pages 1--10, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Building and Simulating Multi-Dimensional Drone Topologies
Recommendations
Multi-rotor drone tutorial: systems, mechanics, control and state estimation
We present a tutorial introduction to the multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles, often simply referred as drones. We first explain typical configuration, components and construction of the drones. We then provide basic kinematic and dynamic modeling of ...
A rendezvous node selection protocol for drone-based data collection
SAC '19: Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied ComputingWith1 developing drone related technologies, a drone can use many types of applications. Terrestrial wireless sensor networks collect and send data by create an autonomous communication network among sensor nodes. In the case of some harsh areas such as ...
The Mothership and Drone Routing Problem
The mothership and drone routing problem (MDRP) considers the routing of a two-vehicle tandem. The larger vehicle, which may be a ship or an airplane, is called the mothership; the smaller vehicle, which may be a small boat or unmanned aerial vehicle, is ...
Comments