skip to main content
10.1145/3416010.3423235acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Building and Simulating Multi-Dimensional Drone Topologies

Published:16 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The next wave of drone applications is moving from repeatable, single-drone activities such as evaluating propagation environments to team-based, multi-drone objectives such as drone-based emergency services. In parallel, testbeds have sought to evaluate emerging concepts such as highly-directional and distributed wireless communications. However, there is a lack of intersection between the two works to characterize the impact of the drone body, antenna placement, swarm topologies, and multi-dimensional connectivity needs that require in-flight experimentation with a surrounding testbed infrastructure. In this work, we design a Multi-Dimensional Drone Communications Infrastructure (MuDDI) to capture complex spatial wireless channel relationships that drone links experience as applications scale from single-drone to swarm-level networks within a shared three-dimensional space. Driven by the challenges of outdoor experimentation, we identify the need for a highly-controlled indoor environment where external factors can be mitigated. To do so, we first build an open-source drone platform to provide programmable control with visibility into the internal flight control system and sensors enabling specialized coordination and accurate repeatable positioning within the isolated environment. We then design a wireless data acquisition system and integrate distributed software defined radios (SDRs) in order to inspect multi-dimensional wireless behavior from the surrounding area. We achieve and demonstrate the value of measurement perspectives from diverse altitudes and spatial locations with the same notion of time. Finally, we demonstrate how multi-dimensional models from experimental measurements can be implemented to simulate multi-drone networks on a practical scale.

References

  1. UAS by the numbers. https://www.faa.gov/uas/resources/by_the_numbers/, Feb. 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. FAA aerospace forecast fiscal years 2019--2039. https://www.faa.gov/data_research/aviation/aerospace_forecasts/media/FY2019-39_FAA_Aerospace_Forecast.pdf, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Vijaya Yajnanarayana, Y.-P. Eric Wang, Shiwei Gao, Siva D. Muruganathan, and Xingqin Lin. Interference mitigation methods for unmanned aerial vehicles served by cellular networks. CoRR, abs/1802.00223, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Drones and networks: Ensuring safe and secure operations, Dec. 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Xingqin Lin, Richard Wiren, Sebastian Euler, Arvi Sadam, Helka-Liina Maattanen, Siva Muruganathan, Shiwei Gao, Y-P Eric Wang, Juhani Kauppi, Zhenhua Zou, et al. Mobile network-connected drones: Field trials, simulations, and design insights. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 14(3):115--125, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Mohammad Mozaffari, Walid Saad, Mehdi Bennis, and Merouane Debbah. Mobile internet of things: Can UAVs provide an energy-efficient mobile architecture?, Jul. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Valenti, B. Bethke, D. Dale, A. Frank, J. McGrew, S. Ahrens, J. P. How, and J. Vian. The MIT indoor multi-vehicle flight testbed. In Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 2758--2759, Apr. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. N. Michael, D. Mellinger, Q. Lindsey, and V. Kumar. The GRASP multiple micro-UAV testbed. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine, 17(3):56--65, Sep. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. P. How, B. Behihke, A. Frank, D. Dale, and J. Vian. Real-time indoor autonomous vehicle test environment. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 28(2):51--64, Apr. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Evcs en Yanmaz, Robert Kuschnig, and Christian Bettstetter. Achieving air-ground communications in 802.11 networks with three-dimensional aerial mobility. In 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, pages 120--124. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. C. Cheng, P. Hsiao, H. T. Kung, and D. Vlah. Performance measurement of 802.11a wireless links from uav to ground nodes with various antenna orientations. In Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, pages 303--308, Oct. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Platforms for Advanced Wireless Research. https://advancedwireless.org/, Mar. 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R. Lim, F. Ferrari, M. Zimmerling, C. Walser, P. Sommer, and J. Beutel. Flocklab: A testbed for distributed, synchronized tracing and profiling of wireless embedded systems. In 2013 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), pages 153--165, Apr. 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Vieira, S. Malkowsky, K. Nieman, Z. Miers, N. Kundargi, L. Liu, I. Wong, V. Öwall, O. Edfors, and F. Tufvesson. A flexible 100-antenna testbed for massive MIMO. In 2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), pages 287--293, Dec. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. D. Raychaudhuri, I. Seskar, M. Ott, S. Ganu, K. Ramachandran, H. Kremo, R. Siracusa, H. Liu, and M. Singh. Overview of the ORBIT radio grid testbed for evaluation of next-generation wireless network protocols. In IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2005, volume 3, pages 1664--1669 Vol. 3, Mar. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Omid Abari, Hariharan Rahul, Dina Katabi, and Mondira Pant. Airshare: Distributed coherent transmission made seamless. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pages 1742--1750. IEEE, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. Badi, J. Wensowitch, D. Rajan, and J. Camp. Experimental evaluation of antenna polarization and elevation effects on drone communications. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, pages 211--220, 2019. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Rice and M. Jensen. Multipath propagation for helicopter-to-ground mimo links. In 2011 - MILCOM 2011 Military Communications Conference, pages 447--452, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. T. J. Willink, C. C. Squires, G. W. K. Colman, and M. T. Muccio. Measurement and characterization of low-altitude air-to-ground mimo channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(4):2637--2648, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. T. Zhou, C. Tao, and L. Liu. LTE-assisted multi-link MIMO channel characterization for high-speed train communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(3):2044--2051, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Matrice 100 specs. https://www.dji.com/matrice100/info, Mar. 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hskt technology specifications. https://www.indotraq.com/, Mar. 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. White rabbit switch. https://sevensols.com/index.php/products/white-rabbit-switch/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. E. Hamed, H. Rahul, M. Abdelghany, and D. Katabi. Real-time distributed mimo systems. In 2016 Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Conferece, page 412--425, 2106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. Corum, J. D. Bonior, R. C. Qiu, N. Guo, and Z. Hu. Evaluation of phase error in a software-defined radio network testbed. In 2012 Proceedings of IEEE Southeastcon, pages 1--4, Mar. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Neel Pandeya. Synchronization and MIMO capability with USRP devices. https://kb.ettus.com/Synchronization_and_MIMO_Capability_with_USRP_Devices, May 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. W. Khawaja, O. Ozdemir, F. Erden, I. Guvenc, and D. W. Matolak. UWB air-to-ground propagation channel measurements and modeling using UAVs. In 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pages 1--10, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Building and Simulating Multi-Dimensional Drone Topologies

                        Recommendations

                        Comments

                        Login options

                        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                        Sign in
                        • Published in

                          cover image ACM Conferences
                          MSWiM '20: Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems
                          November 2020
                          278 pages
                          ISBN:9781450381178
                          DOI:10.1145/3416010

                          Copyright © 2020 ACM

                          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                          Publisher

                          Association for Computing Machinery

                          New York, NY, United States

                          Publication History

                          • Published: 16 November 2020

                          Permissions

                          Request permissions about this article.

                          Request Permissions

                          Check for updates

                          Qualifiers

                          • research-article

                          Acceptance Rates

                          Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%

                        PDF Format

                        View or Download as a PDF file.

                        PDF

                        eReader

                        View online with eReader.

                        eReader