skip to main content
10.1145/3416797.3416826acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Objective Structured Clinical Examination for Assessing Nursing Student Clinical Competency in a High-Fidelity Simulation

Published:01 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper aimed to evaluate students’ clinical competencies through an objective standardized approach in a high-fidelity simulation. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) consisted of assessment, problem identification, nursing interventions, patient instruction. Simulated scenarios were designed by using the high-fidelity simulator and a student standardized patient (SSP) for enhancing the fidelity of interactions between “nurse” and “patient”. The health assessment station included history inquire, physical and psycho-social assessment and professional attitude as well. The decision making station aimed to assess students’ cognitive and critical thinking. The candidates analyzed the collected data, and propose the nursing care problems. In intervention station, the relevant nursing skills were implemented for the reasonable problems. The patient instruction station was designed to assess the knowledge application and interpersonal communication skills. All OSCE evaluation checklists were observational measurements. The inter-rater reliability was established for minimizing the possibility that the scores would vary from rater to rater.

References

  1. Leung, K., Trevena, L., and Waters, D., 2016. Development of a competency framework for evidence-based practice in nursing. Nurse Educ Today.39(Apr. 2016): 189-196. Doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.026.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sastrefullana, P., De PedroGómez, J. E., Bennasarveny, M., Serranogallardo, P., and Moralesasencio, J. M. 2014. Competency frameworks for advanced practice nursing: a literature review. Int Nurs Rev.61(Apr. 2014), 534-542. Doi: 10.1111/inr.12132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Pepin, J., Goudreau, J., Lavoie, P., Belisle, M., Blanchet Garneau, A., Boyer, L., Larue, C., and Lechasseur, K. 2017. A nursing education research framework for transformative learning and interdependence of academia and practice. Nurse Educ Today. 52,(May 2017), 50-52. Doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.02.001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Yuan, H.B., and Williams, B. 2015. Nursing student perspectives of high-fidelity simulation in Macao. J Nurs Science.30(Jul. 2015), 1-5. Doi:10.5480/13-1078.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Yuan, H.B., Williams, B., and Chan, Y.M. 2014. Nursing students’ clinical judgment in high-fidelity simulation based learning A quasi-experimental study. J. Nurse Educ Pract.4 (May 2014):7-15. Doi:10.5430/jnep.v4n5p7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Yuan, H.B. 2018. The scenario design and student interaction with a computer-controlled simulator among baccalaureate nursing students in Macao. J. Nurs Science. 33 (January. 2018), 66-70. Doi:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2018.01.066.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Pagecutrara, K. 2014. Use of prebriefing in nursing simulation: a literature review. J. Nurse Educ. 53(Mar.2014), 136-141. Doi:10.3928/01484834-20140211-07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Khalaila, R. 2014. Simulation in nursing education: an evaluation of students' outcomes at their first clinical practice combined with simulations. Nurse Educ Today. 34(Feb. 2014): 252-258. Doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.08.015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Shin, S., Park, J. H., & Kim, J. H. 2015. Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 35 (Jan. 2015), 176-182. Doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.09.009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mendelberg, T. 2015. A scoping review: conceptualizations and pedagogical models of learning in nursing simulation. Educ Res Rev.10 (Aug. 2015), 1023-1033. Doi: 10.1086/297790 .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang, R., Shi, N., Bai, J., Zheng, Y., and Zhao, Y. 2015. Implementation and evaluation of an interprofessional simulation-based education program for undergraduate nursing students in operating room nursing education: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Educ. 15(Jan. 2015): 115. Doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0400-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Woodruff, K. , ONeill, S. P. , and Walton-Moss, B. J. 2017. Exploring APN students’ perceptions, self-confidence, and satisfaction with clinical simulation. Nurs Educ Perspect. 38(Jun. 2017), 347-349. Doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2016.02.001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Yuan H.B. 2012. A systematic review of selected evidence on improving knowledge and skills through high-fidelity simulation. Nurse Educ Today. 32, 3 (March. 2012), 294-298. Doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.07.010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Blum, C.A., Borglund, S., and Parcells, D. 2010. High-fidelity nursing simulation: Impact on student self-confidence and clinical competence. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh.7(Jun. 2010),1-14. Doi:10.2202/1548-923X.2035Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Harden, R.M., Lilley, P., and Patricio, M. 2016. The Definitive Guide to the OSCE. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination as a Performance Assessment. First ed. Elsevier, Edinburgh 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Cools, E., and Van den Broeck, H. 2007. Development and validation of the cognitive style indicator. J Psychol. 141 (Apr. 2007), 359-387. Doi:10.3200/JRLP.141.4.359-388.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Barton, G., Bruce, A., and Schreiber, R. 2018.Teaching nurses teamwork: Integrative review of competency-based team training in nursing education. Nurse Educ Pract.32(Sep. 2018), 129-137. Doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.11.019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaddoura, M. 2016. Impact of concept mapping on the development of clinical judgment skills in nursing students. Teach Learn Nurs. 11, 3 (March. 2016),101-107. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2016.02.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Leigh, G., Stueben, F., Harrington, D., and Hetherman, S. 2016. Making the case for simulation-based assessments to overcome the challenges in evaluating clinical competency. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 13(Jan. 2016): 131-162. Doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2015-0048.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Isaak, R., Chen, F., and Hobbs, G., 2016. Standardized mixed-fidelity simulation for ACGME milestones competency assessment and objective structured clinical exam preparation. Med Sci Educ. 26 (Mar. 2016), 437-441. Doi: 10.1007/s40670-016-0277-0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rush, S., Ooms, A., Marks-Maran, D., and Firth, T. 2014. Students' perceptions of practice assessment in the skills laboratory: an evaluation study of OSCAs with immediate feedback. Nurse Educ Pract.14 (Apr. 2014), 627–634. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.06.008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEMT '20: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology
    July 2020
    268 pages
    ISBN:9781450388375
    DOI:10.1145/3416797

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 October 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format