skip to main content
10.1145/3416797.3416829acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Prepping the New Normal: The Readiness of Higher Education Institution in Cordillera on a Flexible Learning

Published:01 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The emergence of COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented disruptions in the education sector. For higher education institutions, avoiding and limiting the risks of infection of the academic community has become a primordial concern. Thus, it has become an urgent need to explore innovative learning modalities that will facilitate migration from traditional to flexible teaching and learning options. The paradigm shift therefore in the teaching and learning process in the higher education institutions in Cordillera Administrative Region (CAR) necessitates assessment on the readiness of colleges and universities in the Cordillera as part of this transformation towards new normal. Descriptive research was employed in this study that systematically described the situations of the various Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) of CAR. Online survey was conducted among 28 participating schools in the region. Basic statistical tool like frequency count, weighted mean, averaging and percentages were used to analyze the gathered data. Findings show that, adjusting to the new normal, 25 or 89.3% of the participating HEIs answered that they have been utilizing flexible learning system (FLS) and 16 (57.1%) mentioned that FLS is covered in their institutional policies. Infrastructure to support the delivery of FLS is present among majority of the HEIs. 24 institutions have the capability to develop instructional materials. Faculty and students were also evaluated on their readiness towards the transformation to the new normal and it was revealed that there are challenges that both faculty and students must consider in the adaptation of online distance learning or flexible learning. With the results of the study, school readiness is a big factor in making a decision in shifting from face to face to flexible learning system or online distance learning to achieve quality education. HEIs should therefore develop their own framework, continuity plan or game plan and creation of consortium among HEIs in the region for continuous learning anchored on the existing tools and resources of the institution, capability of staff and faculty members, and capacity of students. Regardless of the modalities of teaching, schools must always aim for the best education that they could give to all students. Equal and quality education must be shared among students amidst this pandemic.

References

  1. Janet Mannheimer Zydney, Zachary Warner, La uren Angelone, 2020 Learning through experience: Using design based research to redesign protocols for blended synchronous learning environments,Computers & Education,Volume 143,2020,103678,ISSN03601315 ,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103678.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Boelens, R., Van Laer, S., De Wever, B., & Elen, J. (2015). Blended learning in adult education: towards a definition of blended learning. Adult learners online! Blended and online learning in adult education and training. Retrieved from http://www.iwt-alo.be/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/01-Project-report-Blended-learning-in- adult-education-towards-a-definition-of-blended-learning.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2008). In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, & S. Marshall (Eds.). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice(3rd ed.). New York and London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://books.google.be/books?id=5Rp9AgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=nl&source= gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354–369. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. ziuban, Chuck & Graham, Charles & Moskal, Patsy & Norberg, Anders & Sicilia, Nicole. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 15. 10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dumford & Miller (2018), pp.453. Challenges on Distance LearningGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lightner, C., Lightner-Laws, C. (2016). A blended model: simultaneously teaching a Quantitative Course Traditionally, Online and Remotely. Interactive Learning Environments/Taylor and Francis, 24(1), 224-238. dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.841262 [Published: January 2016]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Maycock, Keith & Lambert, Jonathan & Bane, Deirdre. (2018). Flipping learning not just content: A 4-year action research study investigating the appropriate level of flipped learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 34. 10.1111/jcal.12274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zengin, Yılmaz. (2017). Investigating the Use of the Khan Academy and Mathematics Software with a Flipped Classroom Approach in Mathematics Teaching. Educational Technology & Society. 20. 89–100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Pilgrim, J., Vasinda, S., Bledsoe, C., & Martinez, E. (2018). Concepts of online text: Examining online literacy tasks of elementary students. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 57(3), 68-82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, Yunglung & Wang, Yuping & Kinshuk, Dr & Chen, Nian-Shing. (2014). Is FLIP enough? or should we use the FLIPPED model instead?. Computers & Education. 79. 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang, Yuping & Han, X. & Yang, Juan. (2015). Revisiting the Blended Learning Literature: Using a Complex Adaptive Systems Framework. Educational Technology and Society. 18. 380-393.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. G. Akçayır, M. Akçayır,(2018), The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges Computers & Education, 126 (July) (2018), pp. 334-345 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, N.-S., Ko, H.-C., Kinshuk, & Lin, T. (2005). A model for synchronous learning using the Internet. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(2), 181-194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Safford, K., & Stinton, J. (2016). Barriers to blended digital distance vocational learning for nontraditional students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 135–150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Swan, K., Garrison, D. R. & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: the Community of Inquiry framework. In Payne, C. R. (Ed.) Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 43-57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mesut Aydemira , E. Emre Özkeskinb , Ayşe Aydın Akkurtc (2014). A theoretical framework on open and distance learning.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 174 ( 2015 ) 1750 – 1757.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Dehghanzadeh S, Jafaraghaee F. Comparing the effects of traditional lecture and flipped classroom on nursing students' critical thinking disposition: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;71:151‐156. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.027Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown, M. G. (2016). Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors' adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Cuesta Medina, L. (2018). Blended learning: Deficits and prospects in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.310Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Prepping the New Normal: The Readiness of Higher Education Institution in Cordillera on a Flexible Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEMT '20: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology
      July 2020
      268 pages
      ISBN:9781450388375
      DOI:10.1145/3416797

      Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 October 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format