skip to main content
10.1145/3416797.3416846acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ESP Students’ Digital Literacy Needs: The Teachers’ Perspectives

Published:01 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

One of the forces of learning in the 21st century is digital lifestyle which can be acquired by obtaining digital literacy. There are many advantages that digital literacy offers, especially in an education setting. However, there was limited literature on students’ digital literacy needs analysis to support the curriculum in ESP context. This study aimed at finding English for Specific Purposes (ESP) students’ digital literacy needs to provide information for constructing ESP curriculum. The data were obtained from 55 ESP teachers through a questionnaire and an interview. Then, the data were analyzed by using content analysis. The result of the study revealed that ESP students needed to have a high degree of expertise on three components of digital literacy proposed by Hague and Payton (2010), namely functional skills, critical thinking and evaluation, and ability to find and select information. In addition, ESP students required to possess a more technical understanding of five components of digital literacy, namely creativity, cultural and social understanding, collaboration, effective communication, and e-safety. It is suggested that ESP teachers and the university policymaker need to consider the students’ digital literacy needs in constructing the ESP curriculum. Moreover, other researchers were suggested to conduct studies using different frameworks of digital literacy.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Bernie Trilling & Charles Fadel. 2009. 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco : Jossey Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Wan Ng. 2012. Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59. 1065-1078.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 2009. Framework for 21st Century Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jeong B. Son. 2015. Digital literacy. Retrieved from http://drjbson.com/projects/dll/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ove E. Hatlevik and Knut-Andreas Christophersen. 2013. Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers & Education, 63, 240–247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ricardo Palmeiro, Visitacion Pereda, and Luisa Aires. 2019. Digital inclusion programs: the case of the Basque country. Revista Lusófona de Educação, 46. 73-88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Pernia E. Enriquez. 2008. Strategy framework for promoting ICT literacy in the Asia-Pacific region. Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Novi Kurnia and Santi I. Astuti. 2017. Peta gerakan literasi digital di Indonesia: studi tentang pelaku, ragam kegiatan, kelompok sasaran dan mitra. Informasi Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi, 47(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Casie Hague and Sarah Payton. 2010. Digital literacy across the curriculum : A future lab handbook. Bristol : Futurelab.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yoram Eshet-Alkalai. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Oktavian Mantiri, Gart K. Hibbert and Jeanette Jacobs. 2019. Digital literacy in ESL classroom. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(5). 1301-1305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Rozalia K .Bako and Gyongyver E. Tokes. 2018. Young Children's Digital Practices in the European Context: Insights from Romania. Communicatio 5. 85-97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Anne M. Bjorgen and Ola Erstad. 2014. The connected child: tracing digital literacy from school to leisure. Pedagogies: an international journal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sandra S. Abrams, Mary B. Schaefer and Daniel Ness. 2019. Adolescents’ digital literacies in flux: intersections of voice, empowerment, and practices. Journal of Media Literacy Education 11 (2), 79 – 94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Cheryl A. McLean. 2010. A space called home: an immigrant adolescent's digital literacy practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(1). 13-22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Klara Nelson, Marcy Courier, and Gilbert W. Joseph. 2019. Teaching tip an investigation of digital literacy needs of students. Journal of Information Systems Education, 22 (2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Amr A. Yassin, Norizan A. Razak and Nor R.M. Maasum. 2019. Investigating the need for computer assisted cooperative learning to improve reading skills among Yemeni university EFL students: a needs analysis study. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 9(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Edi Wahyono and Dewi Puspitasari. 2015. (1 January). Students’ need analysis of English reading skills for academic purposes. Proceedings of ICTTE in Solo, 1, 1007-1014. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/176385-EN-students-need-analysis-of-english-readin.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Wei-Yu Chao and Ju C. Huang. 2016. ESP vs. EGP : investigating English needs of university students in transportation science. English for Specific Purposes World, 49(17).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Fereidoon Vahdany and Leila Gerivani. 2016. An analysis of the English language needs of medical students and general practitioners: a case study of Guilan university of medical sciences. International Journal of English Language and Literature, 5(2). 104-110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ya T. C. Yang, Ya C. Chuang, Lung Y. Li, and Shin S. Tseng. 2013. A blended learning environment for individualized English listening and speaking integrating critical thinking. Computer and Education, 63. 285-305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Peter A. Facione, 2011. Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: Measured Reasons and the California Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Yueer Wei and Jie Hu. 2018. (August). The impact of the digital learning on EFL students’ critical thinking disposition. Proceeding of The 13 th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICSE) in Colombo. 978-1-5386-5495-8/18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Ahmet N. Coklar, Nihal D. Yaman and Isil K. Yurdakul. 2017. Information literacy and digital natives as determinants of online information search strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 70. 1-9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Serene Chan and Mantak Yuen. 2014. Personal and environmental factors affecting teachers’ creativity-fostering practices in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12. 69–77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Tony Wagner. 2010. The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don't teach the new survival skills our children need–and what we can do about it. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Anthony J. Liddicoat and Angela Scarino. 2013. Intercultural Language Teaching and Learning (1 st ed). New Jersey : Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Renee Hobbs and Julie Coiro. 2016. Everyone learns from everyone: collaborative and interdisciplinary professional development in digital literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 59(6).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Jessica K. Parker. 2013. Critical literacy and the ethical responsibilities of student media production. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(8). 668–676.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Lukaz Tomczyk. 2019. (April). Digital literacy in the area of e-safety among teachers (second stage of the primary school) in Poland. Paper presented at The 15 th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, Bucharest, Romania. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332344374_Digital_Literacy_in_the_Area_of_eSafety_among_Teachers_Second_Stage_of_the_Primary_School_in_Poland/link/5caf02a74585156cd78f772f/download.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Ines Busch-Lauer. 2013. (July). A digital revolution in the ESP classroom? The potential of apps, podcasts, e-mags, and social networks revisited. In G. Budin & V. Lušicky (eds.), Languages for Special Purposes in a Multilingual, Transcultural World, Proceedings of the 19th European Symposium on Languages for Special Purposes, in Vienna, Austria. Vienna: University of Vienna, 267-274. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274735152_A_digital_revolution_in_the_ESP_classroom_The_potential_of_apps_podcasts_e-mags_and_social_networks_revisitedGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Iona Mudure-Iacob, I. 2019. Digital Literacy: From Multi-Functional Skills to Overcoming Challenges in Teaching ESP. Astra Salvensis,7(14). 59-70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Tom Hutchinson and Alan Waters. 1987. English for Specific Purposes: a learning centred approach. UK: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Abdul W. Khan. 2019. Digital-native trends in teaching ESP to engineering students in saudi arabia. English Language Teaching, 12 (9). 13-21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEMT '20: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology
    July 2020
    268 pages
    ISBN:9781450388375
    DOI:10.1145/3416797

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 October 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format