skip to main content
10.1145/3417188.3417205acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How Can We Manage the Blackboard Learning Management System to Enhance Student's Learning?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Blackboard is an important learning management system by many institutions. Even though student's interactions and engagements with Blackboard is an essential process that can enhance their learning, it is important to know how students interact with the Blackboard and the resources needed to improve its usage. It was observed that the average student's login onto Blackboard was high at certain periods within the week and besides the students use other online resources in addition to Blackboard. The result is very informative and guides the lecturer to make timely interactive updates on the Blackboard. The results suggest that other online resources must be embedded or linked to Blackboard to enhance wider student's engagements.

References

  1. National Research Council. 2000. Technology to Support Learning. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition: The National Academies Press. Chapter 9. (Washington, DC). https://doi.org/10.17226/9853.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Darrell S. Walker, James R. Lindner, Theresa Pesl Murphrey and Kim Dooley, 2016. Learning management system usage. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17, 2, 41--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Almoeather Reem, 2020. Effectiveness of Blackboard and Edmodo in self-regulated learning satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), 21, 2. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.728140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Quincy Conley, Yvonne Earnshaw and Grayley McWatters. 2020. Examining Course Layouts in Blackboard: Using Eye-Tracking to Evaluate Usability in a Learning Management System. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36, 4, 373--385. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1644841.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Arshi Naim and Fahad Alahmari, 2020. Reference Model of E-learning and Quality to Establish Interoperability in Higher Education Systems. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15, 02, 15--28. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i02.11605.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Florence Martin, 2008. Blackboard as the learning management system of a computer literacy course. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4, 2, 138--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Stewart Adam and Deon Nel, 2009. Blended and online learning: student perceptions and performance. Interactive technology and smart education. https://doi.org/10.1108/17415650911005366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ann Heirdsfield, Susan Walker, Mallihai Tambyah and Denise Beutel, 2011. Blackboard as an online learning environment: What do teacher education students and staff think? Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 36, 7, 1. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n7.4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kalle Romanov and Anne Nevgi, 2007. Do medical students watch video clips in eLearning and do these facilitate learning? Medical teacher, 29, 5, 490--494. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701542119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Shu-Sheng Liaw, 2008. Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & education, 51, 2, 864--873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ayman Elsamanoudy, Fayza Al Fayez, Aliaa Alamoudi and Mohammed Hassanien, 2020. Enhancing students' engagement on using Blackboard as an online learning community tool in Clinical Biochemistry. MedEdPublish, 9. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000071.1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rick D. Axelson and Arend Flick, 2010. Defining Student Engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43, 1, 38--43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2011.533096Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Elizabeth F. Barkley and Claire H. Major, 2020. Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Andrew Pollard and Janet Collins, 2005. Reflective teaching. A&C BlackGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanne Tange, 2010. Caught in the Tower of Babel: university lecturers' experiences with internationalisation. Language and Intercultural Communication, 10, 2, 137--149. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470903342138Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ratna Narayan, Cynthia Rodriguez, Juan Araujo, Ali Shaqlaih and Glenda Moss, 2013. Constructivism---Constructivist learning theory. In B. J. Irby, G. Brown, R. Lara-Alecio, & S. Jackson (Eds.), The handbook of educational theories (p. 169--183). IAP Information Age Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Manoel M. A. Lima, George L. R Brito and Elaine B. Caldeira, 2019. Preference of the use of Moodle as a Learning Management Systems in Brazilian Universities. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 301--307. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.5.4.301--307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. How Can We Manage the Blackboard Learning Management System to Enhance Student's Learning?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICDLT '20: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Deep Learning Technologies
      July 2020
      147 pages
      ISBN:9781450375481
      DOI:10.1145/3417188

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 September 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader