skip to main content
10.1145/3417519.3417522acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Novel Hybrid Network for H&N Organs at Risk Segmentation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we find a network which can achieve better result than the state of the art for Head and Neck Organ at Risks (OARs) segmentation. At first, we enumerate the popular networks, and sum up their characteristic. We extract the main components from these popular networks and we design experiment to evaluate these components. We split the experiment into two stage. At the first stage experiment, we try to find out which components and constructions can let the network achieve better result than baseline model, Unet, for H&N OAR segmentation. After finding out the useful components and constructions, we try to mix them up to build a novel network which absorbs all their merits. At last, we get a hybrid network, Attention-W-net which gets the best result and defeat the state of the art. All networks are evaluated on 16th CSTRO conference H&N OAR segmentation competition dataset.

References

  1. Wilke M, de Haan B, Juenger H, et al. Manual, semi-automated, and automated delineation of chronic brain lesions: a comparison of methods[J]. NeuroImage, 2011, 56(4): 2038--2046.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Wu K, Ung Y C, Hwang D, et al. Autocontouring and Manual Contouring: Which Is the Better Method for Target Delineation Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer? [J]. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2010, 51(10): 1517--1523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Shanthi K J, Kumar M S. Skull stripping and automatic segmentation of brain MRI using seed growth and threshold techniques[C]//2007 International conference on intelligent and advanced systems. IEEE, 2007: 422--426.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hojjatoleslami S A, Kittler J. Region growing: a new approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image processing, 1998, 7(7): 1079--1084.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hojjatoleslami S A, Kruggel F. Segmentation of large brain lesions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2001, 20(7): 666--669.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Wan S Y, Higgins W E. Symmetric region growing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image processing, 2003, 12(9): 1007--1015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kong J, Wang J, Lu Y, et al. A novel approach for segmentation of MRI brain images[C]//MELECON 2006-2006 IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference. IEEE, 2006: 525--528.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Supot S, Thanapong C, Chuchart P, et al. Segmentation of magnetic resonance images using discrete curve evolution and fuzzy clustering[C]//2007 IEEE International Conference on Integration Technology. IEEE, 2007: 697--700.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation[C]//International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Cham, 2015: 234--241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2015: 3431--3440.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Drozdzal M, Vorontsov E, Chartrand G, et al. The importance of skip connections in biomedical image segmentation[M]//Deep Learning and Data Labeling for Medical Applications. Springer, Cham, 2016: 179-187Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Alom M Z, Hasan M, Yakopcic C, et al. Recurrent residual convolutional neural network based on u-net (r2u-net) for medical image segmentation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1802.06955, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Alom M Z, Hasan M, Yakopcic C, et al. Improved inception-residual convolutional neural network for object recognition [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2018: 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhou Z, Siddiquee M M R, Tajbakhsh N, et al. Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation[M]//Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support. Springer, Cham, 2018: 3--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Iandola F, Moskewicz M, Karayev S, et al. Densenet: Implementing efficient convnet descriptor pyramids[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.1869, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gu Z, Cheng J, Fu H, et al. CE-Net: context encoder network for 2D medical image segmentation[J]. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2019, 38(10): 2281--2292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Xia X, Kulis B. W-net: A deep model for fully unsupervised image segmentation[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.08506, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Schlemper J, Oktay O, Schaap M, et al. Attention gated networks: Learning to leverage salient regions in medical images[J]. Medical image analysis, 2019, 53: 197--207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jaderberg M, Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Spatial transformer networks[C]//Advances in neural information processing systems. 2015: 2017--2025.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hu J, Shen L, Sun G. Squeeze-and-excitation networks[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2018: 7132--7141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sudre C H, Li W, Vercauteren T, et al. Generalised dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentations[M]//Deep learning in medical image analysis and multimodal learning for clinical decision support. Springer, Cham, 2017: 240--248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen L C, Zhu Y, Papandreou G, et al. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation[C]//Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). 2018: 801--818.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Novel Hybrid Network for H&N Organs at Risk Segmentation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICBIP '20: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Biomedical Signal and Image Processing
      August 2020
      99 pages
      ISBN:9781450387767
      DOI:10.1145/3417519

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 September 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader