skip to main content
10.1145/3418094.3418110acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmhiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Communication Tool for Disabled People Based on Surface Electromyography

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Surface electromyography is a non-invasive method, which can be used not only for measuring and detecting abnormalities in the human body but also to create biofeedback in rehabilitation. This biofeedback can connect rehabilitation and computer science. Our research is aimed to create biofeedback using surface electromyography, which can help communication for disabled people. For this purpose, we created a simple communication tool, which is based on surface electromyography. Our proposed biofeedback is designed by Arduino Uno with the SpikerShield board, which is responsible for acquiring EMG signals. The software part of our biofeedback is formed in Arduino IDE and the graphical interface was composed in programming language C#. Our proposed communication tool is based on the intensity of muscle activity recorded from the muscle of interest.

References

  1. Kandel, E., Schwartz, J., Hudspeth, A., Siegelbaum, S. and Jessell, T. 2013. Principles of neural science. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zahak, M. 2012. Signal Acquisition Using Surface EMG and Circuit Design Considerations for Robotic Prosthesis. In Computational Intelligence in Electromyography Analysis - A Perspective on Current Applications and Future Challenges. DOI= https://doi.org/10.5772/52556Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Medved, V. 2000. Measurement of Human Locomotion. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420036985Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Shaffer, F. and Moss, D. 2000. Textbook of complementary and alternative medicine. Edition: 2nd. Chapter: Biofeedback. Informa Healthcare.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Basmajian JV. 1979. Biofeedback: Principles and practice for clinicians. Oxford, England: Williams & Wilkins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Giggins, O. M., Persson, U., and Caulfield, B. 2013. Biofeedback in rehabilitation, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 10/issue 1, 60. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-60Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Draper V., Ballard L. 1991. Electrical stimulation versus electromyographic biofeedback in the recovery of quadriceps femoris muscle function following anterior cruciate ligament surgery, Phys Ther, vol. 71/issue 6, pp. 455--461. DOI= https://doi.org /10.1093/ptj/71.6.455Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Krebs D.E. 1981. Clinical electromyographic feedback following meniscectomy, A multiple regression experimental analysis, Phys Ther, vol. 61/issue 7, pp. 1017--1021. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/61.7.1017Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Akkaya N, et al. 2011. Efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback and electrical stimulation following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a randomized controlled trial, ClinRehabil, vol. 26, pp. 224--236. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511419382Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Communication Tool for Disabled People Based on Surface Electromyography

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICMHI '20: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics
        August 2020
        316 pages
        ISBN:9781450377768
        DOI:10.1145/3418094

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 October 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader