skip to main content
10.1145/3419249.3420080acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Designing for Orchestration in Mixed and Virtual Reality: Challenges and Best Practices

Published:26 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mixed and Virtual Reality (XR) have seen an important development since the advent of low-cost technologies. The application space is still diversifying, opening up new opportunities and application areas for such technologies. An important common feature of Mixed and Virtual Reality applications is that designers and engineers need to orchestrate virtual content and user experience. We regard orchestration of Mixed and Virtual Reality as invisible work: in many cases, orchestration is hidden within the task of story scripting of applications. It is often occluded by designing and programming Mixed and Virtual Reality. As such, orchestration is regarded as a means to a goal, which occludes its importance for the design of XR systems. We would like to invite the research community to address this issue, by focusing this workshop on highlighting and exemplifying orchestration challenges and best practices, and to systematise the orchestration topic in the context of the recent technology advances. We will consider a wide range of orchestration cases, from completely pre-orchestrated to live-orchestrated Mixed and Virtual Reality. Based on that knowledge, we aim to consider novel tools to support designers and users in their orchestration work. We invite scholars and practitioners to contribute to our workshop, with cases from their work.

References

  1. Steve Benford, Adam Drozd, Chris Greenhalgh, Mike Fraser, Holger Schnädelbach, Boriana Koleva, Rob Anastasi, Martin Flintham, Terry Hemmings, Andy Crabtree, 2006. Orchestrating real-time participatory experiences. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Christoph W. Borst, Nicholas G. Lipari, and Jason W. Woodworth. 2018. Teacher-Guided Educational VR: Assessment of Live and Prerecorded Teachers Guiding Virtual Field Trips. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2018.8448286Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jinki Jung, Jihye Hong, Sungheon Park, and Hyun S. Yang. 2012. Smartphone as an Augmented Reality Authoring Tool via Multi-Touch Based 3D Interaction Method. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry(Singapore, Singapore) (VRCAI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2407516.2407520Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Boriana Koleva, Ian Taylor, Steve Benford, Mike Fraser, Chris Greenhalgh, Holger Schnädelbach, Dirk vom Lehn, Christian Heath, Ju Row-Farr, and Matt Adams. 2001. Orchestrating a Mixed Reality Performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CHI ’01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365033Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Marius Koller, Sebastian F. Rauh, Anders Lundström, Cristian Bogdan, and Gerrit Meixner. 3002 Accepted at IEEE ICHI 2020. Continuous Interaction for a Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy System.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Marius Koller, Philip Schäfer, Daniel Lochner, and Gerrit Meixner. 2019. Rich Interactions in Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy: A Pilot-Study evaluating a System for Presentation Training. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, ICHI 2019. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHI.2019.8904768Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Anders Lundström and Ylva Fernaeus. 2019. The disappearing computer science in healthcare VR applications. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363398Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Michael J Muller. 1999. Invisible Work of Telephone Operators: An Ethnocritical Analysis. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 8, 1 (1999), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008603223106Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Eileen A O’Connor and Jelia Domingo. 2017. A practical guide, with theoretical underpinnings, for creating effective virtual reality learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 45, 3 (2017), 343–364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sebastian F. Rauh, Philip Schäfer, Marius Koller, and Gerrit Meixner. 3001 In preparation. A Mixed Reality Occupational Safety Training for World-Wide Distribution.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing for Orchestration in Mixed and Virtual Reality: Challenges and Best Practices
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          NordiCHI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society
          October 2020
          1177 pages
          ISBN:9781450375795
          DOI:10.1145/3419249

          Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 October 2020

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • extended-abstract
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          NordiCHI '20 Paper Acceptance Rate89of399submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format