skip to main content
10.1145/3419804.3420265acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An attempt to convert BPMN models to SDL

Published:19 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Models of complex systems and systems of systems are described with NAF (NATO Architecture Framework) or DoDAF (DoD Architecture Framework). Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) is part of NAF and allows describing the behaviour of the different participants in the model. This notation is used by the French Army as well as its main suppliers to describe the interactions between participants involved in a mission. It is therefore important the models are correct. The VeriMoB project was a research project financed by the DGA (Direction Générale de l'Armement) which aimed at developing a tool that will help users to validate their BPMN models among the stakeholders. The tool had to cover three main aspects: a static verification, an interactive execution, and an automatic exploration of the possible scenarios. This paper will present the work done trying to convert BPMN to SDL in order to fulfil this objective with an existing toolset.

References

  1. Madis Abel. 2011. Lightning fast business process simulator. Master's thesis. Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Juan Carlos Polanco Aguilar, Koji Hasebe, Manuel Mazzara, and Kazuhiko Kato. 2016. Model Checking of BPMN Models for Reconfigurable Workflows. CoRR (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Olfa Allani and Sonia Ayachi Ghannouchi. 2016. Verification of BPMN 2.0 Process Models: An Event Log-based Approach. Procedia Computer Science 100 (2016), 1064--1070.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Thomas Allweyer and Stefan Schweitzer. 2012. A Tool for Animating BPMN Token Flow. In Business Process Model and Notation - 4th International Workshop, BPMN 2012, Vienna, Austria, September 12-13, 2012. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 125), Jan Mendling and Matthias Weidlich (Eds.). Springer, 98--106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mihal Brumbulli, Emmanuel Gaudin, and Frédéric Berre. 2020. Verification of BPMN Models. In Complex Systems Design & Management, Guy André Boy, Alan Guegan, Daniel Krob, and Vincent Vion (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 27--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mihal Brumbulli, Emmanuel Gaudin, and Ciprian Teodorov. 2020. Automatic Verification of BPMN Models. In 10th European Congress on Embedded Real Time Software and Systems (ERTS 2020). Toulouse, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. ITU-T. 2019. Specification and Description Language -- Overview of SDL-2010. ITU-T Recommendation Z.100. International Telecommunication Union -- Telecommunication Standardization Sector. http://handle.itu.int/11.1002/1000/14048.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ajay Krishna, Pascal Poizat, and Gwen Salaün. 2017. VBPMN: Automated Verification of BPMN Processes (Tool Paper). In Integrated Formal Methods - 13th International Conference, IFM 2017, Turin, Italy, September 20-22, 2017, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10510), Nadia Polikarpova and Steve Schneider (Eds.). Springer, 323--331.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. OMG. 2014. OMG Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Version 2.0.2. OMG Standard. Object Management Group. https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. José Luís Pereira and António Paulo Freitas. 2016. Simulation of BPMN Process Models: Current BPM Tools Capabilities. In New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1 [WorldCIST'16, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil, March 22-24, 2016] (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 444), Álvaro Rocha, Ana Maria Ramalho Correia, Hojjat Adeli, Luís Paulo Reis, and Marcelo Mendonça Teixeira (Eds.). Springer, 557--566.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kristina Rosenthal, Benjamin Ternes, and Stefan Strecker. 2018. Business Process Simulation: A Systematic Literature Review. In ECIS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Anna Suchenia, Piotr Wisniewski, and Antoni Ligeza. 2017. Overview of Verification Tools for Business Process Models. In Communication Papers of the 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, FedCSIS 2017, Prague, Czech Republic, September 3-6, 2017 (Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, Vol. 13), Maria Ganzha, Leszek A. Maciaszek, and Marcin Paprzycki (Eds.). 295--302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAM '20: Proceedings of the 12th System Analysis and Modelling Conference
    October 2020
    156 pages
    ISBN:9781450381406
    DOI:10.1145/3419804

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 19 October 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    SAM '20 Paper Acceptance Rate16of26submissions,62%Overall Acceptance Rate36of59submissions,61%

    Upcoming Conference

    ICSE 2025
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader