skip to main content
10.1145/3421558.3421576acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesipmvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Neural-Network Model for Deriving Analogous Three-vector ECGs of S-ICD from Standard Nine-lead ECGs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

With clinically reported problems of current subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillator (S-ICD), such as over-sense of ECG signals and correspondingly inappropriate shock, popularization of the surgical implantation process looks eagerly forward to a pre-operative ECG screening for doctor to determine whether a patient is suitable for an implantation or not. In this work, a nonlinear BP (back propagation) neural network model with three layers was proposed for deriving analogous three-vector ECGs from surface standard nine-lead ECGs of a patient, which can be recorded easily and non-invasively before the implantation. To evaluate its reconstruction performance, we trained and tested this model in 21 patients and 4 health subjects from two public standard 12-lead ECG databases. Over 320 thirty-seconds ECG segments, three analogous ECGs including the Primary, Secondary, and Alternate vectors (corresponding to standard leads I, II, and V2) can be derived well from the remaining nine-lead ECGs, and the obtained average R/T ratio between of the original and derived ECGs has a mean p-value 0.22 > 0.05. In addition, the correlation coefficients and the root mean square error are of around 0.82-0.93 and 55.9-92.3 μV, respectively. The obtained results indicate a great correlation between of the original and derived ECG signals. As such, this work would be of great significance for the future study on the clinical applicability of a pre-operative screening tool with the proposed method of this pilot work.

References

  1. Willcox, Mark E., Prutkin, Jordan M., and Bardy, Gust H. "Recent developments in the subcutaneous ICD." Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine (2016). DOI= 10.1016/j.tcm.2016.03.004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu-Ray, Indranill, "Subcutaneous Versus Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy." Jacc Clinical Electrophysiology (2017). DOI= 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.07.017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stacy B Westerman, and Mikhael El-Chami. "The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator––review of the recent data." Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 15.3(2018):222-228. DOI= 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.03.004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. "Sensitivity and specificity of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator pre-implant screening tool." International Journal of Cardiology 195(2015):205-209. DOI= 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.05.082Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Nils, B Geholz, "Direct comparison of the novel automated screening tool (AST) versus the manual screening tool (MST) in patients with already implanted subcutaneous ICD." International Journal of Cardiology 265(2018):90-96. DOI=10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Konishi, Shozo. "Routine exercise testing could not predict T-wave oversensing in a patient after a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implant." Clinical Case Reports 6.2(2018):309-313. DOI= 10.1002/ccr3.1345Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Syeda, "Inappropriate subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy due to R-wave amplitude variation: Another challenge in device management." Heartrhythm Case Reports (2017). DOI= 10.1016/j.hrcr.2016.09.010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gordon E. Dower. "Deriving the 12-lead electrocardiogram from four (EASI) electrodes." journal of electrocardiology 21. supp-S(1988). DOI= 10.1016/0022-0736(88)90090-8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Vozda, M, and Cerny, M. "Methods for derivation of orthogonal leads from 12-lead electrocardiogram: A review." Biomedical signal processing and control 19. may(2015):23-34. DOI= 10.1016/j.bspc.2015.03.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Atoui, H., Fayn, J., and Rubel, P. "A Novel Neural-Network Model for Deriving Standard 12-Lead ECGs From Serial Three-Lead ECGs: Application to Self-Care." Information Technology in Biomedicine IEEE Transactions on 14.3(2010). DOI= 10.1109/TITB.2010.2047754Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bousseljot R, Kreiseler D, Schnabel, A. Nutzung der EKG-Signaldatenbank CARDIODAT der PTB über das Internet. Biomedizinische Technik, Band 40, Ergänzungsband 1 (1995). DOI = https://doi.org/10.13026/C28C71Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Glass L.et al. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals (2003). Circulation. 101(23) DOI= https://doi.org/10.13026/C2V88NGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Wilson, David G. "Reconstruction of an 8-lead surface ECG from two subcutaneous ICD vectors." International Journal of Cardiology 236.Complete(2017):194-197. DOI= 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.117Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IPMV '20: Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Image Processing and Machine Vision
    August 2020
    194 pages
    ISBN:9781450388412
    DOI:10.1145/3421558

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 November 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format