skip to main content
10.1145/3421558.3421589acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesipmvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Hand Movement Prediction Based on EEG signals by Combining MEMD and CSP

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

For prosthetic limb control and rehabilitation training of disabilities, it is important to use electroencephalography (EEG) to recognize different hand movements to assist the disabilities. In this paper, we proposed a novel method by combining multivariate empirical mode decomposition (MEMD) and common spatial pattern (CSP) to extract EEG features, and achieved the prediction of hand movement. Thirty-channel EEG signals and four-channel EMG signals were acquired during the experiment, and the EEG signals were captured one second prior to the beginning of detected hand movement based on the surface electromyography (EMG) signals. MEMD was applied to decomposing the pre-processed EEG signals into several multivariate intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) and CSP was used to extract the features of IMFs. Then, the principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce the feature dimension. In the end, six one-versus-one support vector machines were applied to classify the EEG signals. Ten subjects participated in this experiment consisting of four types of hand movements. EEG signals were divided into a training set and a test set by five-fold cross-validation. The average classification accuracy was regarded as the final results. The optimal single IMF and combination IMFs for classification were analyzed in this study. The results showed that the proposed method had a good performance in predicting the upcoming hand movements by classifying the signals prior to the detected hand movement. The combination of IMF1, IMF2, and IMF3 revealed the highest average classification accuracy of 82.67%, and the average kappa coefficient was 0.77, which indicated the predicted results were highly consistent with the actual results. It indicates that the proposed method combining MEMD and CSP is suitable for predicting different types of hand movements.

References

  1. Wang, G., Wang, Z., Chen, W., , 2006. Classification of surface EMG signals using optimal wavelet packet method based on Davies-Bouldin criterion. Med Biol Eng Comput 44, 865-872. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0100-y.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Wang, G., Yan, Z., Hu, X., , 2006. Classification of surface EMG signals using harmonic wavelet packet transform. Physiological Measurement 27, 1255-1267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/27/12/001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., 2014. The Analysis of Surface EMG Signals with the Wavelet-Based Correlation Dimension Method. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/284308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhang, Y., Wang, G., Teng, C., , 2014. The Analysis of Hand Movement Distinction Based on Relative Frequency Band Energy Method. Biomed Research International. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/781769.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jochumsen, M., Niazi, I.K., Mrachacz-Kersting, N., , 2015. Comparison of spatial filters and features for the detection and classification of movement-related cortical potentials in healthy individuals and stroke patients. Journal of Neural Engineering 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/12/5/056003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Xu, R., Jiang, N., Mrachacz-Kersting, N., , 2014. A Closed-Loop Brain-Computer Interface Triggering an Active Ankle-Foot Orthosis for Inducing Cortical Neural Plasticity. Ieee Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 61, 2092-2101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2014.2313867.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Quandt, F., Reichert, C., Hinrichs, H., , 2012. Single trial discrimination of individual finger movements on one hand: A combined MEG and EEG study. Neuroimage 59, 3316-3324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.053.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Sardouie, S.H., Shamsollahi, M.B., 2012. Selection of efficient features for discrimination of hand movements from MEG using a BCI competition IV data set. Frontiers in Neuroscience 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00042.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ramos-Murguialday, A., Broetz, D., Rea, M., , 2013. Brain-Machine Interface in Chronic Stroke Rehabilitation: A Controlled Study. Annals of Neurology 74, 100-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.23879.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Liao, K., Xiao, R., Gonzalez, J., , 2014. Decoding individual finger movements from one hand using human EEG signals. PLoS One 9, e85192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jochumsen, M., Niazi, I.K., Dremstrup, K., , 2016. Detecting and classifying three different hand movement types through electroencephalography recordings for neurorehabilitation. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 54, 1491-1501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1421-5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Suwannarat, A., Pan-ngum, S., Israsena, P., 2018. Comparison of EEG measurement of upper limb movement in motor imagery training system. Biomedical Engineering Online 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0534-0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Biasiucci, A., Leeb, R., Iturrate, I., , 2018. Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke. Nature Communications 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Katsis, C.D., Exarchos, T.P., Papaloukas, C., , 2007. A two-stage method for MUAP classification based on EMG decomposition. Computers in Biology and Medicine 37, 1232-1240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2006.11.010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rehman, N., Mandic, D.P., 2010. Multivariate empirical mode decomposition. Proceedings of the Royal Society a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 466, 1291-1302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2009.0502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Wang, Y.H., Berg, P., Scherg, M., 1999. Common spatial subspace decomposition applied to analysis of brain responses under multiple task conditions: a simulation study. Clinical Neurophysiology 110, 604-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1388-2457(98)00056-x.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ramoser, H., Muller-Gerking, J., Pfurtscheller, G., 2000. Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. Ieee Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 8, 441-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/86.895946.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Blankertz, B., Tomioka, R., Lemm, S., , 2008. Optimizing spatial filters for robust EEG single-trial analysis. Ieee Signal Processing Magazine 25, 41-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/msp.2008.4408441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Pearson, K., 1901. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine 2, 559-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786440109462720Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Chang, C.-C., Lin, C.-J., 2011. LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines. Acm Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1961189.1961199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hsu, C.W., Lin, C.J., 2002. A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. Ieee Transactions on Neural Networks 13, 415-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/72.991427.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Dietterich, T. G., 1998. Approximate Statistical Tests for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning Algorithms. Neural Computation 7, 1895-923. https://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089976698300017197..Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Huang, N.E., Shen, Z., Long, S.R., , 1998. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 454, 903-995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1998.0193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IPMV '20: Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Image Processing and Machine Vision
    August 2020
    194 pages
    ISBN:9781450388412
    DOI:10.1145/3421558

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 November 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format