skip to main content
10.1145/3422713.3422722acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbdtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sarcasm Detection Using Graph Convolutional Networks with Bidirectional LSTM

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sarcasm is a form of figurative language where the literal meaning of words does not hold, and instead, the opposite interpretation is intended. This deliberate ambiguity makes sarcasm detection an important task in sentiment analysis. Sarcasm detection is considered to be a binary classification problem. Traditional works rely heavily on feature-rich traditional models and deep learning models. However, in the model training, previous works worked with a sentence or comment as a unit, they may lose some important global features and ignore rich relational structures in the corpus. In contrast, if we use the whole sarcasm corpus to construct a graph network in the model, we can learn to get representations with global information under sarcasm background. In this work, we propose a new type of neural network model. Specifically, we use a graph convolutional neural(GCN) network to capture the features of global information in the satire context and jointly bidirectional LSTM(bi-LSTM) neural network to capture the sequence features of the comments respectively. And finally, we concatenate these two embeddings and put them into a traditional classifier for classification prediction. Experiment results include precision, accuracy, recall and F1 score on the publicly available dataset show that our model is significantly better than the standard evaluation model benchmarks.

References

  1. Bo Pang, Lillian Lee, et al. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2(1-2): 1--135Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. SilvioAmir, ByronCWallace, Hao Lyu, and Paula Carvalho Mário J Silva. 2016. Modeling context with user embeddings for sarcasm detection in social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.00976 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aniruddha Ghosh and Tony Veale. 2016. Fracking sarcasm using neural network. In Proceedings of the 7th workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity, sentiment and social media analysis. 161--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Yi Tay, Luu Anh Tuan, Siu Cheung Hui, and Jian Su. 2018. Reasoning with Sarcasm by Reading In-between. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.02856 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Meishan Zhang, Yue Zhang, and Guohong Fu. 2016. Tweet sarcasm detection using deep neural network. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, The 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. 2449--2460.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Battaglia, P.W.; Hamrick, J.B.; Bapst, V.; Sanchez-Gonzalez, A.; Zambaldi, V.; Malinowski, M.; Tacchetti, A.; Raposo, D.; Santoro, A.; Faulkner, R.; et al. 2018. Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Peng, H.; Li, J.; He, Y.; Liu, Y.; Bao, M.; Wang, L.; Song, Y.; and Yang, Q. 2018. Large-scale hierarchical text classification with recursively regularized deep graph-cnn. In WWW, 1063--1072.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cai, H.; Zheng, V. W.; and Chang, K. 2018. A comprehensive survey of graph embedding: problems, techniques and applications. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 30(9): 1616- 1637.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Diana Maynard and Mark A. Greenwood. 2014. Who cares about sarcastic tweets? Investigating the impact of sarcasm on sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference on Language Resource and Evaluation (LREC'14).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellen Riloff, Ashequl Qadir, Prafulla Surve, Lalindra De Silva, Nathan Gilbert, and Ruihong Huang. 2013. Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods for Natural Language Processing (EMNLP'13). 704--714.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Roberto González-Ibánez, Smaranda Muresan, and Nina Wacholder. 2011. Identifying sarcasm in twitter: A closer look. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Short Papers-Volume 2. Association for Computational Linguistics, 581--586.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Zelin Wang, Zhijian Wu, Ruimin Wang, and Yafeng Ren. 2015. Twitter sarcasm detection exploiting a context-based model. In Web Information Systems Engineering--WISE 2015. Springer, 77--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Basilis Charalampakis, Dimitris Spathis, Elias Kouslis, and Katia Kermanidis. 2016. A comparison between semi-supervised and supervised text mining techniques on detecting irony in greek political tweets. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence (2016). DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2016.01.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Amir Silvio, Byron C. Wallace, Hao Lyu, and Paula Carvalho Mário J Silva. 2016. Modelling context with user embeddings for sarcasm detection in social media. Proceedings of CoNLL 2016. 167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Soujanya Poria, Erik Cambria, Devamanyu Hazarika, and Prateek Vij. 2016. A deeper look into sarcastic tweets using deep convolutional neural networks. arXiv:1610.08815 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kipf, T. N., and Welling, M. 2017. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, Q.; Han, Z.; and Wu, X. 2018. Deeper insights into graph convolutional networks for semi-supervised learning. In AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mikhail Khodak, Nikunj Saunshi, and Kiran Vodrahalli. 2017. A large self-annotated corpus for sarcasm. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.05579.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Meishan Zhang, Yue Zhang, and Guohong Fu. 2016. Tweet sarcasm detection using deep neural network. In COLING 2016. 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference: Technical Papers, December 11-16, 2016, Osaka, Japan. 2449--2460.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Aniruddha Ghosh and Tony Veale. 2017. Magnets for sarcasm: Making sarcasm detection timely, contextual and very personal. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2017, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 9-11, 2017. 482--491.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Sarcasm Detection Using Graph Convolutional Networks with Bidirectional LSTM

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICBDT '20: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Big Data Technologies
      September 2020
      250 pages
      ISBN:9781450387859
      DOI:10.1145/3422713

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 October 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader