skip to main content
10.1145/3422713.3422749acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbdtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Development of Family Continuity Management Training for Medical Staffs Based on Business Continuity Management Concept

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nowadays, the Business Continuity Management (BCM) is one of the most effective programs to reduce impact from crisis, incident, or any disaster for organizations focusing on their continuity operations. In addition to handling the incident which disrupts or interferes the business processes, the BCM has been developed into a new term of strategy like "resilience." The purpose of this research is to develop and implement the BCM framework program for family. In this study, the proposed "Family Continuity Management" (FCM) program training was conducted for 51 medical staffs. There are 10 phases in the FCM training program experiment. The samples gave their opinions to this study for future program improvement through face-to-face interview after FCM training program. This conceptual idea is expected to guide the FCM program future improvement.

References

  1. Wahlstrom, M., Guha-Sapir, D. 2015. The Human Cost of Weather-Related Disasters 1995--2015. CRED and UNISDR, Brussels, Belgium and Geneva, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. GBD 2016 Risk Factors Collaborators. 2016. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hiles, A. 1994. The Definitive Handbook of Business Continuity Management (2nd ed.). Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Waite, L. J. 2000. The family as a social organization: Key ideas for the twenty-first century. Contemp. Sociol. 29, 3 (May 2000), 463--469. DOI= http://doi.org/10.2307/2653933.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Thammarux, P., Leelawat, N. and Matsuoka, M. 2018. Seismic hazard evaluation system development for BCP assessment of Thai tourist startups. In Proceedings of the 7th Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering (Pathum Thani, Thailand, November 22--25, 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sapapthai, S., Leelawat, N., Tang, J., Kodaka, A., Chintanapakdee, C., Ino, E. and Watanabe, K. 2020. A stakeholder analysis approach for area business continuity management: A systematic review. J. Disaster Res., 15, 5 (August 2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lakbala, P. 2016. Hospital workers disaster management and hospital nonstructural: A study in Bandar Abbas, India. Glob. J. Health Sci., 8, 4 (2006), 221. DOI = 10.5539/gjhs.v8n4p221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ukai, T. 1996. Problem of emergency medical care at the time of the Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. Ann. Burns Fire Disasters, 9, 4 (December 1996), 6p.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibb, F. and Buchanan, S. 2006. A framework for business continuity management. Int. J. Inform. Manag., 26 (2006), 128--141. DOI = https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2005.11.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. International Organization for Standardization. 2018. Risk management -- Guidelines. (ISO Standard no. 31000). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Metheny, M. 2017. Federal Cloud Computing: The Definitive Guide for Cloud Service Providers (2nd ed.). Syngress, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Silvers, J. R. 2008. Risk Management for Meetings and Events. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. International Organization for Standardization. 2019. Security and resilience --- Business continuity management systems --- Requirements (ISO/TC Standard no. 22301).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Drennan, L.T., McConnell, A. and Stark, A. 2007. Risk and Crisis Management in the Public Sector (2nd ed.). Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Weber, E. U., Blais, A. R. and Betz, N. E. 2002. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. J. Behav. Decis. Mak., 15 (August 2002), 263--290. DOI = https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.414Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Leelawat, N., Tang, J., Saengtabtim, K. and Laosunthara, A. 2020. Trends of tweets on the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. J. Disaster Res., 15, 4 (June 2020), 530--533. DOI= https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2020.p0530Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Meechang, K., Leelawat, N., Tang, J., Kodaka, A. and Chintanapakdee, C. 2020. The acceptance of using information technology for disaster risk management: A systematic review. Eng. J., 24, 4 (July 2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Development of Family Continuity Management Training for Medical Staffs Based on Business Continuity Management Concept

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICBDT '20: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Big Data Technologies
        September 2020
        250 pages
        ISBN:9781450387859
        DOI:10.1145/3422713

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 October 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader