skip to main content
10.1145/3423335.3428170acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Towards the automatic selection of moving regions representation methods

Published:03 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Moving region is an abstraction used to represent the spatio-temporal behavior of real-world phenomena in database systems. The most common approach to model moving regions uses geometries to represent their position and shape at different times (observations), and interpolation functions to generate the evolution of the geometries between observations.

Several region interpolation methods have been proposed in the databases literature, but as there is no suitable method for all use cases, users must select the most adequate algorithm to represent each region by visual inspection. This can be infeasible when dealing with large datasets.

This paper presents the first steps towards a system that suggests which methods (and configurations) can generate representations fitting the requirements of a particular application. It includes an abstract specification of user-defined rules on the spatio-temporal evolution of moving regions to assess the suitability of region interpolation functions, a discussion on optimization strategies for efficient implementation of the rules and illustrative examples using real-world data to show how to use this approach to select the best methods to represent a spatio-temporal phenomena.

References

  1. Rogério Luís C. Costa, Enrico Miranda, Paulo Dias, and José Moreira. 2020. Evaluating Preprocessing and Interpolation Strategies to Create Moving Regions from Real-World Observations. SIGAPP Appl. Comput. Rev. 20, 2 (July 2020), 46--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rogério Luís C. Costa, Enrico Miranda, Paulo Dias, and José Moreira. 2020. Sampling Strategies to Create Moving Regions from Real World Observations. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 609--616.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Rogério Luís de Carvalho Costa and Pedro Furtado. 2011. Quality of experience in distributed databases. Distributed and Parallel Databases 29, 5 (2011), 361--396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. José Duarte, Paulo Dias, and José Moreira. 2018. A Framework for the Management of Deformable Moving Objects. In Geospatial Technologies for All - Selected Papers of the 21st AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science (Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography). Springer, 327--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. José Duarte, Bruno Silva, José Moreira, Paulo Dias, Enrico Miranda, and Rogério L. C. Costa. 2019. Towards a Qualitative Analysis of Interpolation Methods for Deformable Moving Regions. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (SIGSPATIAL '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 592--595.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Martin Erwig, Ralf Hartmut Güting, Markus Schneider, and Michalis Vazirgiannis. 1998. Abstract and Discrete Modeling of Spatio-Temporal Data Types. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (GIS '98). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 131--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Luca Forlizzi, Ralf Hartmut Güting, Enrico Nardelli, and Markus Schneider. 2000. A Data Model and Data Structures for Moving Objects Databases. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 319--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ralf Hartmut Guting, Victor Almeida, Dirk Ansorge, Thomas Behr, Zhiming Ding, Thomas Hose, Frank Hoffmann, Markus Spiekermann, and Ulrich Telle. 2005. SECONDO: An Extensible DBMS Platform for Research Prototyping and Teaching. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE '05). IEEE Computer Society, USA, 1115--1116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sofie Haesevoets and Bart Kuijpers. 2000. Closure Properties of Classes of Spatio-Temporal Objects for Boolean Set Operations. In Procs 7th International Workshop on Temporal Representation and Reasoning. TIME 2000. IEEE, USA, 79--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Florian Heinz and Ralf Hartmut Güting. 2016. Robust high-quality interpolation of regions to moving regions. GeoInformatica 20, 3 (Jul 2016), 385--413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mark Mckenney and Roger Frye. 2015. Generating Moving Regions from Snapshots of Complex Regions. ACM Trans. Spatial Algorithms Syst. 1 (2015), 4:1--4:30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mark McKenney and James Webb. 2010. Extracting Moving Regions from Spatial Data. In Proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (GIS '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 438--441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Erlend Tøssebro and Ralf Hartmut Güting. 2001. Creating Representations for Continuously Moving Regions from Observations. In Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases, 7th International Symposium, SSTD 2001 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Vol. 2121. Springer, 321--344.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards the automatic selection of moving regions representation methods

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GeoSim '20: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on GeoSpatial Simulation
        November 2020
        70 pages
        ISBN:9781450381611
        DOI:10.1145/3423335

        Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 November 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        GeoSim '20 Paper Acceptance Rate9of14submissions,64%Overall Acceptance Rate16of24submissions,67%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader