skip to main content
10.1145/3423423.3423436acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Characterization of the Link Quality of a Coordinated Wireless Environment

Published:07 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The joint use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and wireless sensor networks (WSN) enables to monitor dangerous and inaccessible places. However, the success of this deployment depends on the quality of the wireless links connecting the sensor nodes on the ground with one another and with the UAVs. These links are affected by several factors including the physical environment, the ease with which the UAVs navigate or hover, the energy reserve, wind, and the MAC protocols arbitrating the wireless media between the UAVs and the WSN. In this paper we present experimental results pertaining to link quality fluctuations, packet delivery ratio, channel symmetry, and continuous packet transmission success and failure statistics. Furthermore, we propose a probabilistic model for estimating the time a UAV requires to successfully collect k number of packets from a ground gateway.

References

  1. Nadeem Ahmed, Salil S Kanhere, and Sanjay Jha. 2016. On the importance of link characterization for aerial wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 54, 5 (2016), 52–57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Nouha Baccour, Anis Koubâa, Luca Mottola, Marco Antonio Zúñiga, Habib Youssef, Carlo Alberto Boano, and Mário Alves. 2012. Radio link quality estimation in wireless sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 8, 4 (sep 2012), 1–33. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2240116.2240123Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Xiaojuan Chao, Waltenegus Dargie, and Guan Lin. 2008. Energy model for h2s monitoring wireless sensor network. In 2008 11th IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering. IEEE, 402–409.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ching-Ju Chen, Jou-An Chen, and Yueh-Min Huang. 2017. INTELLIGENT ENVIRONMENTAL SENSING WITH AN UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM IN A WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK.International Journal on Smart Sensing & Intelligent Systems 10, 3(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Rone Ilídio da Silva and Mario A Nascimento. 2016. On best drone tour plans for data collection in wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of the 31st annual ACM symposium on applied computing. 703–708.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Waltenegus Dargie, Xiaojuan Chao, and Mieso K Denko. 2010. Modelling the energy cost of a fully operational wireless sensor network. Telecommunication Systems 44, 1-2 (2010), 3–15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Neil Ferguson, Daniel Laydon, Gemma Nedjati Gilani, Natsuko Imai, Kylie Ainslie, Marc Baguelin, Sangeeta Bhatia, Adhiratha Boonyasiri, ZULMA Cucunuba Perez, Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg, 2020. Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Omprakash Gnawali, Rodrigo Fonseca, Kyle Jamieson, David Moss, and Philip Levis. 2009. Collection tree protocol. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on embedded networked sensor systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ruan D Gomes, Diego V Queiroz, Abel C Lima Filho, Iguatemi E Fonseca, and Marcelo S Alencar. 2017. Real-time link quality estimation for industrial wireless sensor networks using dedicated nodes. Ad Hoc Networks 59(2017), 116–133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Zijun Gong, Cheng Li, Fan Jiang, Ruoyu Su, Ramachandran Venkatesan, Chuiyang Meng, Shuai Han, Yan Zhang, Shudong Liu, and Kun Hao. 2017. Design, analysis, and field testing of an innovative drone-assisted zero-configuration localization framework for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 66, 11 (2017), 10322–10335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Cao Huiru, Lv Xuanjiao, Li Yeqian, Luo Guo, 2016. Design and experiment of a WSN sink platform based on fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicles. In 2016 IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC). IEEE, 1271–1274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoon Jeong, Changwon Lee, Jaehong Ryu, Byeong-Cheol Choi, and JeongGil Ko. 2015. Poster: Communicating” in the Air”: Studying the Impact of UAVs on Sensor Network Data Collection. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 435–436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Billy Kyle. 2018. DJI OcuSync vs. DJI Lightbridge – What’s the difference?https://dronedj.com/2018/07/27/dji-ocusync-vs-lightbridge/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chieh-Jan Mike Liang, Nissanka Bodhi Priyantha, Jie Liu, and Andreas Terzis. 2010. Surviving wi-fi interference in low power zigbee networks. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on embedded networked sensor systems. 309–322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Bodhibrata Mukhopadhyay, Sanat Sarangi, and Subrat Kar. 2015. Performance evaluation of localization techniques in wireless sensor networks using RSSI and LQI. In 2015 Twenty First National Conference on Communications (NCC). IEEE, 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Michael Nekrasov, Ryan Allen, Irina Artamonova, and Elizabeth Belding. 2019. Optimizing 802.15. 4 Outdoor IoT Sensor Networks for Aerial Data Collection. Sensors 19, 16 (2019), 3479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jacob Palmer, Nicholas Yuen, John-Paul Ore, Carrick Detweiler, and Elizabeth Basha. 2015. On air-to-water radio communication between UAVs and water sensor networks. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 5311–5317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Fabio Parmeggiani, Nicholas J Weise, Syed T Ahmed, and Nicholas J Turner. 2018. Synthetic and therapeutic applications of ammonia-lyases and aminomutases. Chemical reviews 118, 1 (2018), 73–118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Chadwick R Powell, Kearsley M Dillon, and John B Matson. 2018. A review of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) donors: Chemistry and potential therapeutic applications. Biochemical pharmacology 149 (2018), 110–123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lei Shu, Mithun Mukherjee, and Xiaoling Wu. 2016. Toxic gas boundary area detection in large-scale petrochemical plants with industrial wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 54, 10 (2016), 22–28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Andrey Somov, Alexander Baranov, Alexey Savkin, Denis Spirjakin, Andrey Spirjakin, and Roberto Passerone. 2011. Development of wireless sensor network for combustible gas monitoring. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 171, 2 (2011), 398–405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kannan Srinivasan, Prabal Dutta, Arsalan Tavakoli, and Philip Levis. 2010. An empirical study of low-power wireless. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 6, 2 (feb 2010), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/1689239.1689246Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Kannan Srinivasan and Philip Levis. 2006. RSSI is under appreciated. In Proceedings of the third workshop on embedded networked sensors (EmNets), Vol. 2006. Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. João Valente, David Sanz, Antonio Barrientos, Jaime del Cerro, Ángela Ribeiro, and Claudio Rossi. 2011. An air-ground wireless sensor network for crop monitoring. Sensors 11, 6 (2011), 6088–6108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Fernando J Velez, Aleksandra Nadziejko, Anders Lyhne Christensen, Sancho Oliveira, Tiago Rodrigues, Vasco Costa, Miguel Duarte, Fernando Silva, and Jorge Gomes. 2015. Wireless sensor and networking technologies for swarms of aquatic surface drones. In 2015 IEEE 82nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2015-Fall). IEEE, 1–2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Emilian Vlasceanu, Dan Popescu, and Loretta Ichim. 2019. Aerial Robotic Team for Complex Monitoring in Precision Agriculture. In 2019 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS). IEEE, 167–169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Haven Well. 2015. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jianjun Wen and Waltenegus Dargie. 2018. A Mobility Management Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. In 2018 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC). IEEE, 390–396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Evşen Yanmaz, Markus Quaritsch, Saeed Yahyanejad, Bernhard Rinner, Hermann Hellwagner, and Christian Bettstetter. 2017. Communication and coordination for drone networks. In Ad Hoc Networks. Springer, 79–91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Evşen Yanmaz, Saeed Yahyanejad, Bernhard Rinner, Hermann Hellwagner, and Christian Bettstetter. 2018. Drone networks: Communications, coordination, and sensing. Ad Hoc Networks 68(2018), 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Ying-Ying Zheng, Yi-Tong Ma, Jin-Ying Zhang, and Xiang Xie. 2020. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nature Reviews Cardiology 17, 5 (2020), 259–260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IoT '20 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Internet of Things
    October 2020
    145 pages
    ISBN:9781450388207
    DOI:10.1145/3423423

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 October 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate28of84submissions,33%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format