skip to main content
10.1145/3424616.3424693acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesweb3dConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Deictic Gesture Retargeting for Telepresence Avatars in Dissimilar Object and User Arrangements

Published:09 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The avatar-mediated 3D telepresence system aims to enable a user in local space to interact with a remote user through a virtual avatar representing the remote user. In this system, the avatar’s movement should convey the meaning of the remote user’s movement to the local space. If the local and remote spaces have different spatial configurations, the remote user’s placement and motion should be adapted to the local space so as to preserve the motion semantics of the remote user. To this end, this paper presents a method to generate the placement and deictic gestures of the avatar. First, we develop a method to predict the probability of the avatar’s placement in the local space according to the placement of the remote user. From this, we find the optimal placement of the avatar given the configuration of the local space and the remote user’s placement. Second, we develop a simple yet effective method to retarget the remote user’s deictic gesture to his/her avatar. User study shows that our method improves user engagement and social presence in the tested telepresence scenarios.

References

  1. Weidong Huang, Leila Alem, and Franco Tecchia. 2013. HandsIn3D: supporting remote guidance with immersive virtual environments. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 70–77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Dongsik Jo, Ki-Hong Kim, and Gerard Jounghyun Kim. 2015. SpaceTime: adaptive control of the teleported avatar for improved AR tele-conference experience. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 26, 3-4 (2015), 259–269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kangsoo Kim, Divine Maloney, Gerd Bruder, Jeremy N Bailenson, and Gregory F Welch. 2017. The effects of virtual human’s spatial and behavioral coherence with physical objects on social presence in AR. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 28, 3-4 (2017), e1771.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Yeonjoon Kim, Hangil Park, Seungbae Bang, and Sung-Hee Lee. 2016. Retargeting human-object interaction to virtual avatars. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 22, 11(2016), 2405–2412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Morgan Le Chénéchal, Thierry Duval, Valérie Gouranton, Jérôme Royan, and Bruno Arnaldi. 2016. Vishnu: Virtual immersive support for helping users-an interaction paradigm for collaborative remote guiding in mixed reality. In 3DCVE 2016: International Workshop on Collaborative Virtual Environments. IEEE, 1–5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Matthew Lombard, Theresa B Ditton, and Lisa Weinstein. 2009. Measuring presence: the temple presence inventory. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Workshop on Presence. 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrew Maimone and Henry Fuchs. 2012. Real-time volumetric 3D capture of room-sized scenes for telepresence. In 3DTV-Conference: The True Vision-Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON), 2012. IEEE, 1–4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ohan Oda, Carmine Elvezio, Mengu Sukan, Steven Feiner, and Barbara Tversky. 2015. Virtual replicas for remote assistance in virtual and augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. ACM, 405–415.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sergio Orts-Escolano, Christoph Rhemann, Sean Fanello, Wayne Chang, Adarsh Kowdle, Yury Degtyarev, David Kim, Philip L Davidson, Sameh Khamis, Mingsong Dou, 2016. Holoportation: Virtual 3d teleportation in real-time. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 741–754.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Tomislav Pejsa, Julian Kantor, Hrvoje Benko, Eyal Ofek, and Andrew Wilson. 2016. Room2Room: Enabling Life-Size Telepresence in a Projected Augmented Reality Environment. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1716–1725. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819965Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Franco Tecchia, Leila Alem, and Weidong Huang. 2012. 3D helping hands: a gesture based MR system for remote collaboration. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry. ACM, 323–328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    Web3D '20: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on 3D Web Technology
    November 2020
    201 pages
    ISBN:9781450381697
    DOI:10.1145/3424616

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 November 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate27of71submissions,38%

    Upcoming Conference

    WEB3D '24
    The 29th International ACM Conference on 3D Web Technology
    September 25 - 27, 2024
    Guimarães , Portugal

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format