skip to main content
10.1145/3424771.3424813acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseuroplopConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Pattern for Autonomous Vehicle Platoon

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 December 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Fuel consumption and road throughput are the foremost problems faced by the transportation industry. The cost of fuel is a large share of total transportation costs. Vehicle platooning offers a solution to this problem. Vehicle platoon is a group of vehicles that acts as a single unit through coordinated movements on the road. Vehicles in a platoon travel together closely and face low aerodynamic drag. This leads to less fuel-consumption and optimizes the amount of space used by the vehicles on a highway thereby, offers great potential to maximize the highway throughput. In this paper we present an architectural design pattern for the vehicle platoon which gives a holistic view of the platooning system. First, we explain the problems faced by autonomous vehicles. It is followed by the architecture of the system. All the scenarios in which the platooning system can be used are represented as use cases of the system. We explain three basic use cases of the platooning system in this paper. Consequences section describes how this architectural pattern for platooning helps to solve the problems of the transportation industry.

References

  1. OECD. 2014. Highlights of the International Transport Forum 2013: Funding Transport: Session Summaries. OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/itf_highlights-2013-en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Schitttler. 2003. State-of-the-Art and Emerging Truck Engine Technologies for Optimized Performance, Emission and Life Cycle Costs, DaimlerChrysler AG (US), Stuttgart, Germany, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alberto Bull. 2004. Traffic congestion: The problem and how to deal with it. (LC/G.2199-P). Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Xhafer Krasniqi and Edmond Hajrizi. 2016. Use of IoT Technology to Drive the Automotive Industry from Connected to Full Autonomous Vehicles. IFAC-PapersOnLine, Volume 49, Issue 29, 2016. Pages 269--274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.078.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Sebastian Thrun. 2010. Toward robotic cars. Communications of the ACM, April 2010, Vol. 53 No. 4, Pages 99--106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1721654.172167Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mario Gerla and Eun-Kyu Lee. 2016. Internet of vehicles: From intelligent grid to autonomous cars and vehicular clouds. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. September 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147716665500Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Darwish and Kamalrulnizam Abu Bakar. 2018. Fog Based Intelligent Transportation Big Data Analytics in The Internet of Vehicles Environment: Motivations, Architecture, Challenges and Critical Issues. IEEE Access March 2018 PP (99):1-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2815989Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Crunchbase. 2018. Peloton Technology. Retrieved April 29, 2020 from https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/peloton-technologyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Rolf Lockwood. 2016. Truck Platooning, Past, Present, and Future. Retrieved April 29, 2020 from https://www.truckinginfo.com/156677/truck-platooning-past-present-and-futureGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiafa Liu, Di Ma and André Weimerskirch. 2016. Secure and Safe Automated Vehicle Platooning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Jia, K. Lu, J. Wang, X. Zhang and X. Shen. 2016. A Survey on Platoon-Based Vehicular Cyber-Physical Systems. In IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 263--284. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2410831Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. F. Buschmann, R. Meunier, H. Rohnert, P. Sommerlad, and M. Stal. 1996. Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture (Volume 1: A System of Patterns) Wiley Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. E. B. Fernandez, N. Yoshioka and H. Washizaki. 2015. Patterns for Security and Privacy in Cloud Ecosystems. In 2nd International Workshop on Evolving Security and Privacy Requirements Engineering (ESPRE 2015). https://doi. org/10.1109/ESPRE. 2015.7330162Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Giovanni Nardini and Antonio Virdis. 2018. Cellular-V2X Communications for Platooning: Design and Evaluation. Sensors 2018, 18(5), 1527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051527Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Meng Wang and Sander van Maarseveen. 2019. Benefits and Risks of Truck Platooning on Freeway Operations Near Entrance Ramp. Transportation Research Record, 2673(8), 588--602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119842821Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. S. Halle, J. Laumonier, and B. Chaib-Draa. 2004. A decentralized approach to collaborative driving coordination. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems In proceedings of the 7th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8749) https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2004.1398942Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Amoozadeh, A. Raghuramu, C. N. Chuah, D. Ghosal and K. Levitt. 2015. Security vulnerabilities of connected vehicle streams and their impact on cooperative driving. IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 126--132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2015.7120028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hu Hao, Lu Rongxing, Huang Cheng and Zhang Zonghua. 2016. TripSense: A Trust-Based Vehicular Platoon Crowdsensing Scheme with Privacy Preservation in VANETs. Sensors 2016, 16(6), 803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s16060803Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ben-Jye Chang, Yueh-Lin Tsai, and Ying-Hsin Liang. 2017. Platoon-Based Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control for Achieving Active Safe Driving Through Mobile Vehicular Cloud Computing. Wireless Personal Communications volume 97, pages5455-5481(2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4789-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. D. Su and Sanghyun Ahn. 2017. In-vehicle sensor-assisted platoon formation by utilizing vehicular communications. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. July 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147717718756Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Mani Amoozadeh, Hui Deng, Chen-Nee Chuah. 2015. Platoon management with cooperative adaptive cruise control enabled by VANET. Vehicular Communications. Volume 2, Issue 2, ISSN 2214-2096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2015.03.004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Peloton. 2016. How truck platooning works-peloton technologies. Retrieved April 02, 2020 from https://peloton-tech.com/how-it-works/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Pedro Fernandes and Urbano J. Nunes. 2012. Platooning with DSRC-based IVC-enabled autonomous vehicles: Adding infrared communications for IVC reliability improvement. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2012 IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2012.6232206Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Jon Thomson. 2016. ISUZU AND HINO FALL INTO LINE WITH PLATOONING. Retrieved February 25, 2020 from https://www.truckandbus.net.au/isuzu-and-hino-fall-into-line-with-platooning/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. G. Jentzsch. 2019. Platooning in the logistics industry: Researchers see great potential in real operations after tests. Retrieved February 25, 2020 from https://www.truck.man.eu/de/en/man-world/man-in-germany/press-and-media/Platooning-in-the-logistics-industry_-Researchers-see-great-potential-in-real-operations-after-tests-372998.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Edwin Lopez. 2019. Daimler: There is 'no business case' for truck platooning. Retrieved February 25, 2020 from https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/Daimler-platooning-automated-truck-CES/545524/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Raghav Anand. 2018. California Partners for Advanced Transportation Technology. Retrieved February 25, 2020 from https://path.berkeley.edu/research/connected-and-automated-vehicles/truck-platooningGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Scania writers. 2018. Platooning automated driving for fuel saving. Retrieved February 25, 2020 from https://www.scania.com/group/en/platooning-automated-driving-for-fuel-savings/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Michael L. Nelson. 1999. A design pattern for autonomous vehicle software control architectures. In Proceedings 23 Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (Cat.No.99CB37032) https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.1999.812696.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. A. Sahu, E. B. Fernandez, Mihaela Cardei, and Michael Vanhilst. 2010. A pattern for a sensor node. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLOP '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 1--7. https://doi. org/10.1145/2493288.2493295Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. J. Nabih, D. Nicholas and T. Kemal. 2012. New combined WiMAX/DSRC infrastructure design for efficient vehicular networking. vehicular networking. J Wireless Com Network 2012, 264 (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1499-2012-264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. E. B. Fernandez. 2013. Security Patterns in Practice: Designing Secure Architectures Using Software patterns. (ISBN-13: 978-1119998945). J. Wiley Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Pattern for Autonomous Vehicle Platoon

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      EuroPLoP '20: Proceedings of the European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs 2020
      July 2020
      434 pages
      ISBN:9781450377690
      DOI:10.1145/3424771

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 December 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      EuroPLoP '20 Paper Acceptance Rate37of58submissions,64%Overall Acceptance Rate216of354submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader