skip to main content
10.1145/3424953.3426500acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Strategies to improve engagement of long-lived elderly women (80+) in the interaction co-design process: challenges and lessons learned

Published:23 December 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The growing population ageing highlights the need for strategies that enable older people to remain healthy and active. Digital technologies can contribute to this; however, the interaction of the elderly subject with these technologies is still frustrating, as these technologies are usually not designed with the needs and expectations of the elderly subject in mind. Engaging the elderly person in a process of interaction codesign may be a viable solution. However, conducting them in participatory activities is challenging. In this paper, we discuss our experiences in engaging ten elderly women, mostly long-lived (80+) in a process of interaction codesign, presenting some strategies used to improve engagement throughout the process, reflecting on the challenges and lessons learned. It is hoped that these strategies can help researchers and designers to engage elderly people in design processes with an effective participatory approach.

References

  1. Cláudio Márcio de Araújo, Maria Cláudia Santos Lopes de Oliveira, and Maristela Rossato. 2017. O sujeito na pesquisa qualitativa: desafios da investigação dos processos de desenvolvimento. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa 33 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Maria Cecília C Baranauskas, CS de Souza, and Roberto Pereira. 2014. I grandihc-br---grandes desafios de pesquisa em interaçao humano-computador no brasil. Relatório Técnico. Comissão Especial de Interação Humano-Computador (CEIHC) da Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC) (2014), 27--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. ACPL Carvalho, F de Ponce de Leon, et al. 2006. Grandes desafios da pesquisa em computação no brasil-2006--2016. São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. John Chisholm. 2016. What is co-design. Design For Europe 8 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jennifer L Davidson and Carlos Jensen. 2013. Participatory design with older adults: an analysis of creativity in the design of mobile healthcare applications. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition. 114--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jennifer L Davidson and Carlos Jensen. 2013. What health topics older adults want to track: a participatory design study. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Carlos Alberto Debastiani. 2016. Definindo escopo em projetos de software. Novatec Editora.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kevin Doherty and Gavin Doherty. 2018. Engagement in HCI: conception, theory and measurement. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 51, 5 (2018), 1--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Rosine Eisma, Anna Dickinson, Joy Goodman, Audrey Syme, Lachimi Tiwari, and Alan F Newell. 2004. Early user involvement in the development of information technology-related products for older people. Universal Access in the Information Society 3, 2 (2004), 131--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Rachel L Franz, Barbara Barbosa Neves, Carrie Demmans Epp, Ronald Baecker, and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2019. Why and How Think-Alouds with Older Adults Fail: Recommendations from a Study and Expert Interviews. In Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction Research with Older People. Springer, 217--235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Susanne Frennert. 2012. I want one too! Domestication of Assistive Robots. PDC2012 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Niels Hendriks, Frederik Truyen, and Erik Duval. 2013. Designing with dementia: Guidelines for participatory design together with persons with dementia. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 649--666.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Iolanda Iacono and Patrizia Marti. 2014. Engaging older people with participatory design. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational. 859--864. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Netta Iivari. 2004. Enculturation of user involvement in software development organizations-an interpretive case study in the product development context. In Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction. 287--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Alexandre Kalache. 1987. Envelhecimento populacional no Brasil: uma realidade nova.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wiesław Kopeć, Radoslaw Nielek, and Adam Wierzbicki. 2018. Guidelines towards better participation of older adults in software development processes using a new SPIRAL method and participatory approach. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering. 49--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Merlijn Kouprie and Froukje Sleeswijk Visser. 2009. A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user's life. Journal of Engineering Design 20, 5 (2009), 437--448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Eva Maria Lakatos and Mariana de Andrade Marconi. 2017. Fundamentos de metodologia científica (368 pp.). São Paulo: Atlas (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Stephen Lindsay, Daniel Jackson, Guy Schofield, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Engaging older people using participatory design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1199--1208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Aqueasha Martin-Hammond, Sravani Vemireddy, and Kartik Rao. 2018. Engaging older adults in the participatory design of intelligent health search tools. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 280--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Michael Massimi, Ronald M Baecker, and Michael Wu. 2007. Using participatory activities with seniors to critique, build, and evaluate mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. 155--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Tuuli Mattelmäki and Katja Battarbee. 2002. Empathy probes. In PDC, Vol. 7. 266--271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Maria Cecília de Souza Minayo and António Pedro Costa. 2019. Técnicas que fazem o uso da palavra, do olhar e da empatia: Pesquisa Qualitativa em Ação. In Técnicas que fazem o uso da palavra, do olhar e da empatia: Pesquisa Qualitativa em Ação. 63--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Luã Marcelo Muriana and Heiko Hornung. 2016. Who are you? Getting to know and understanding older adults with dementia in participatory design at a nursing home. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Sally Newman and Alan Hatton-Yeo. 2008. Intergenerational learning and the contributions of older people. Ageing horizons 8, 10 (2008), 31--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. World Health Organization et al. 2005. Envelhecimento ativo: uma política de saúde. (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Dorota Orzeszek, Wieslaw Kopec, Marcin Wichrowski, Radoslaw Nielek, Bartlomiej Balcerzak, Grzegorz Kowalik, and Malwina Puchalska-Kaminska. 2017. Beyond participatory design: Towards a model for teaching seniors application design. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.05667 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jean CS Rosa and Ecivaldo Matos. 2016. Semio-participatory framework for interaction design of educational software. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Elizabeth B-N Sanders. 2002. From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In Design and the social sciences. CRC Press, 18--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Elizabeth B-N Sanders, Eva Brandt, and Thomas Binder. 2010. A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. In Proceedings of the 11th biennial participatory design conference. 195--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Candace L Sidner, Cory D Kidd, Christopher Lee, and Neal Lesh. 2004. Where to look: a study of human-robot engagement. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. 78--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson. 2012. Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Clay Spinuzzi. 2005. The methodology of participatory design. Technical communication 52, 2 (2005), 163--174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Froukje Sleeswijk Visser, Pieter Jan Stappers, Remko Van der Lugt, and Elizabeth BN Sanders. 2005. Contextmapping: experiences from practice. CoDesign 1, 2 (2005), 119--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Diego Zabot, Saulo Andrade, and Ecivaldo Matos. 2019. Game Design participativo com crianças surdas e com deficiência auditiva: uma experiência no ensino fundamental. In Anais do I Workshop sobre Interação e Pesquisa de Usuários no Desenvolvimento de Jogos. SBC, 49--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Mary Zajicek. 2002. Patterns for encapsulating speech interface design solutions for older adults. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Universal usability. 54--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Strategies to improve engagement of long-lived elderly women (80+) in the interaction co-design process: challenges and lessons learned

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IHC '20: Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      October 2020
      519 pages
      ISBN:9781450381727
      DOI:10.1145/3424953

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 December 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      IHC '20 Paper Acceptance Rate60of155submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader