skip to main content
10.1145/3424978.3425025acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Antenna Selection for MIMO-NOMA-based Hybrid Satellite-terrestrial Relay Network

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we have studied the impact of the antenna configuration on the performance of hybrid state-terrestrial relay networks (HSTRN) with a non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) scheme. To ensure the best outage performance of the primary user and maximize the communication capacity of the secondary users, we have proposed a multi-antenna selection scheme under the decode-and-forward (DF) strategy, which can greatly reduce the computational complexity. Firstly, we assume that there is no direct link between the satellite and the terrestrial user, and communication can only be assisted through the relay. Then, we derive users' exact outage probability expressions and asymptotic outage probability expressions under high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Finally, simulations are provided to validate the correctness of the theory and the impact of parameter configuration on the system outage performance.

References

  1. B Evans, et al. (2005). Integration of satellite and terrestrial systems in future multimedia communications. IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 72--80, Oct. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. X Liang, J Jiao, S Wu and Q Zhang (2018). Outage Analysis of Multirelay Multiuser Hybrid Satellite-Terrestrial Millimeter-Wave Networks. In IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1046--1049, Dec. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Z Lin, M Lin, J-B Wang, Y Huang, and W-P Zhu (2018). Robust secure beamforming for 5G cellular networks coexisting with satellite networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 932--945, Apr. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Z Lin, M Lin, B Champagne, W P Zhu and N Al-Dhahir (2020). Secure beamforming for cognitive satellite terrestrial networks with unknown eavesdroppers. IEEE Systems Journal, doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2020.2983309.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Z Lin, M Lin, W P Zhu, J B Wang and J Cheng (2020). Robust secure beamforming for wireless powered cognitive satellite-terrestrial networks. IEEE Transaction on Cognitive Communications and Networking, doi: 10.1109/TCCN.2020.3016096.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. K. An, Y. Li, T. Liang, and X. Yan (2019). On the Performance of Cache-Enabled Hybrid Satellite-Terrestrial Relay Networks. IEEE Wireless Communications Letter, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1506--1509, June 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M K Arti and V Jain (2017). Relay selection-based hybrid satellite-terrestrial communication systems. IET Commun., vol. 11, no. 17, pp. 2566--2574, Nov. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. K An, M Lin and T Liang (2015). On the Performance of Multiuser Hybrid Satellite-Terrestrial Relay Networks with Opportunistic Scheduling. In IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1722--1725, Oct. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. K An, J Ouyang, M Lin and T Liang (2015). Outage Analysis of multi-antenna cognitive hybrid satellite-terrestrial relay networks with beamforming. IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1157--1160, Jul. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. W. Lu, K. An and T. Liang (2019). Robust beamforming design for sum secrecy rate maximization in multibeam satellite systems. IEEE Trans. Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1568--1572, June 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. K. An, M. Lin, J. Ouyang and W.-P. Zhu (2016). Secure transmission in cognitive satellite terrestrial networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 3025--3037. Nov. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. W. Lu, K. An, T. Liang, G. Zheng, and S. Chatzinotas (2020). Secure energy efficiency maximization in cognitive satellite-terrestrial networks. IEEE Systems Journal, doi. 10.1109/JSYST.2020.2980049, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. K Guo, et al. (2019). On the Performance of the Uplink Satellite Multiterrestrial Relay Networks with Hardware Impairments and Interference. In IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 2297--2308, Sept. 2019, doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2019.2901800.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Z Lin, M Lin, J Wang, T De Cola and J Wang (2019). Joint beamforming and power allocation for satellite-terrestrial integrated networks with nonorthogonal multiple access. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 657--670, June 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Z Ding, Z Yang, P Fan and H V Poor (2014). On the performance of nonorthogonal multiple access in 5G systems with randomly deployed users. IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1501--1505, Dec. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Z Ding, H Dai and H V Poor (2016). Relay selection for cooperative NOMA. IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 416--419, Aug. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Y Yu, H Chen, Y Li, Z Ding and B Vucetic (2017). Antenna selection for MIMO-NOMA networks. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Paris, 2017, pp. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. X. Yan, et al. (2020). Ergodic Capacity of NOMA-Based Uplink Satellite Networks with Randomly Deployed Users. IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 3343--3350, Sep. 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. W. Lu, et al. (2020). Robust Beamforming in Multibeam Satellite Systems with Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access. IEEE Wireless Communications Letter, doi 10.1109/LWC.2020.3007192, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik (2007). Table of integrals, series, and products," Mathematics of Computation, vol. 20, no. 96, pp. 1157--1160, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Neumaier (2001). Introduction to Numerical Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. K. An, et al. (2019). Hybrid Satellite-Terrestrial Relay Networks with Adaptive Transmission. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.vol. 68, no. 12, Dec. 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Antenna Selection for MIMO-NOMA-based Hybrid Satellite-terrestrial Relay Network

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CSAE '20: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
      October 2020
      1038 pages
      ISBN:9781450377720
      DOI:10.1145/3424978

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 October 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      CSAE '20 Paper Acceptance Rate179of387submissions,46%Overall Acceptance Rate368of770submissions,48%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader