skip to main content
10.1145/3424978.3425120acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lower Limb Motion Recognition by Integrating Multi-modal Features Based on Machine Learning Method

Published: 20 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Various natural and man-made disasters such as wars, diseases and natural disasters have caused a large number of people to become physically disabled, while artificial limbs can help disabled patients to recover certain physical functions, so that they can integrate into society as ordinary people. One of the key techniques in the artificial limbs is the pattern recognition of the limb movement intention, which is still a challenging problem in relative researches. In this research, we proposed a reliable method by using multi-modal sources to recognize the intention of limb movement. First, we collected four signal sources which are EMG, acceleration, knee angles and foot pressure signal at various movement condition of the participant. Then we extract the relevant features from the four different signals. After that we used Relief-F to filter the multi-modal features to screen bad or redundant features. Finally, we compared the performance of three classifiers, which are LDA, SVM, LM-BP to find out the best algorithm to fit this problem. The result shows that when using the classifier of LDA, the average accuracy of movement intention recognition can reach up to 92.46%, while the time consuming is largely decreased compared to the other two models. The result revealed a feasible method to solve the problem of continuous recognition of the intention of limb movement.

References

[1]
Malbran M D (2011). World Report on Disability. WHO, 8(4), 290.
[2]
Cherelle P, Grosu V, Matthys A, et al. (2013). Design and Validation of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic (AMP-) Foot 2.0. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems & Rehabilitation Engineering A Publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society, 22(1), 138.
[3]
Goldfarb M, Lawson B E and Shultz A H (2013). Realizing the Promise of Robotic Leg Prostheses. Science Translational Medicine, 5(210), 210ps15.
[4]
Lawson B E, Mitchell J, Truex D, et al. (2014). A Robotic Leg Prosthesis: Design, Control, and Implementation. Robotics & Automation Magazine IEEE, 21(4), 70--81.
[5]
Zhu J, Wang Q and Wang L (2014). On the Design of a Powered Transtibial Prosthesis with Stiffness Adaptable Ankle and Toe Joints. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(9), 4797--4807.
[6]
Wang Q, Yuan K, Zhu J, et al. (2015). Walk the Walk A Lightweight Active Transtibial Prosthesis. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 22(4), 80--89.
[7]
Lawson B E and Varol H A (2011). Standing Stability Enhancement with an Intelligent Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 58(9), 2617--2624.
[8]
Pizzolato S, Tagliapietra L, Cognolato M, et al. (2017). Comparison of six electromyography acquisition setups on hand movement classification tasks. PLoS One, 12(10), e0186132.
[9]
Phinyomark A, Phukpattaranont P and Limsakul C (2012). Feature reduction and selection for EMG signal classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(8), 7420--7431.
[10]
Disselhorst-Klug C, Schmitz-Rode T and Rau G (2009). Surface electromyography and muscle force: Limits in sEMG-force relationship and new approaches for applications. Clinical Biomechanics, 24(03), 225--235.
[11]
Kuribayashi K, Shimizu S, Okimura K, et al. (1993). A discrimination system using neural network for EMG-controlled prostheses-Integral type of EMG signal processing Proceedings of 1993 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '93), (03), 1750--1755.
[12]
Reddy N P and Gupta V (2007). Toward direct biocontrol using surface EMG signals: Control of finger and wrist joint models. Medical Engineering & Physics, 29(3), 398--403.
[13]
Feng Z and Xu T (2011). Comparison of SOM and PCA-SOM in Fault Diagnosis of Ground testing Bed. Procedia Engineering, 15, 1271--1276.
[14]
Beretta L and Santaniello A (2011). Implementing ReliefF filters to extract meaningful features from genetic lifetime datasets. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44(2), 361--369.
[15]
Urbanowicz R J, Meeker M, La Cava W, et al. (2018). Relief-based feature selection: Introduction and review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 85, 189--203.
[16]
Wang N, Lao K, Zhang X, et al. (2019). The recognition of grasping force using LDA. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 47, 393--400.
[17]
Gerhardt N, Schwolow S, Rohn S, et al. (2019). Quality assessment of olive oils based on temperature-ramped HS-GC-IMS and sensory evaluation: Comparison of different processing approaches by LDA, KNN, and SVM. Food Chemistry, 278, 720--728.
[18]
Sui X, Wan K and Zhang Y (2019). Pattern recognition of SEMG based on wavelet packet transform and improved SVM. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 176, 228--235.
[19]
Alkan A and Günay M (2012). Identification of EMG signals using discriminant analysis and SVM classifier. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 44--47.
[20]
Tavakoli M, Benussi C, Alhais Lopes P, et al. (2018). Robust hand gesture recognition with a double channel surface EMG wearable armband and SVM classifier. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 46, 121--130.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Estimation of human intended motion and its phase for human-assist systems2022 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)10.1109/SMC53654.2022.9945330(1531-1536)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2022

Index Terms

  1. Lower Limb Motion Recognition by Integrating Multi-modal Features Based on Machine Learning Method

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CSAE '20: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
    October 2020
    1038 pages
    ISBN:9781450377720
    DOI:10.1145/3424978
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 October 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Intelligent prosthetic
    2. Machine learning
    3. Pattern recognition
    4. Relief-F

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CSAE 2020

    Acceptance Rates

    CSAE '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 179 of 387 submissions, 46%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 368 of 770 submissions, 48%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Estimation of human intended motion and its phase for human-assist systems2022 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)10.1109/SMC53654.2022.9945330(1531-1536)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2022

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media