skip to main content
research-article

A Semi-supervised Learning Approach Based on Adaptive Weighted Fusion for Automatic Image Annotation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 April 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

To learn a well-performed image annotation model, a large number of labeled samples are usually required. Although the unlabeled samples are readily available and abundant, it is a difficult task for humans to annotate large numbers of images manually. In this article, we propose a novel semi-supervised approach based on adaptive weighted fusion for automatic image annotation that can simultaneously utilize the labeled data and unlabeled data to improve the annotation performance. At first, two different classifiers, constructed based on support vector machine and covolutional neural network, respectively, are trained by different features extracted from the labeled data. Therefore, these two classifiers are independently represented as different feature views. Then, the corresponding features of unlabeled images are extracted and input into these two classifiers, and the semantic annotation of images can be obtained respectively. At the same time, the confidence of corresponding image annotation can be measured by an adaptive weighted fusion strategy. After that, the images and its semantic annotations with high confidence are submitted to the classifiers for retraining until a certain stop condition is reached. As a result, we can obtain a strong classifier that can make full use of unlabeled data. Finally, we conduct experiments on four datasets, namely, Corel 5K, IAPR TC12, ESP Game, and NUS-WIDE. In addition, we measure the performance of our approach with standard criteria, including precision, recall, F-measure, N+, and mAP. The experimental results show that our approach has superior performance and outperforms many state-of-the-art approaches.

References

  1. David M. Blei and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Modeling annotated data. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Informaion Retrieval (SIGIR). ACM, 127–134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. Jan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (Jan. 2003), 993–1022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Avrim Blum and Tom Mitchell. 1998. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory (COLT’98). 92–100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gustavo Carneiro, Antoni B. Chan, Pedro J. Moreno, and Nuno Vasconcelos. 2007. Supervised learning of semantic classes for image annotation and retrieval. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 29, 3 (2007), 394–410.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hakan Cevikalp, Burak Benligiray, and Omer Nezih Gerek. Apr. 2020. Semi-supervised robust deep neural networks for multi-label image classification. Pattern Recogn. 100, Article 107164 (Apr. 2020), 9 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chih-Chung Chang and Chih-Jen Lin. 2011. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2, 3 (2011), 1–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Xiangyu Chen, Yadong Mu, Shuicheng Yan, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2010. Efficient large-scale image annotation by probabilistic collaborative multi-label propagation. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM’10). ACM, 35–44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Tat-Seng Chua, Jinhui Tang, Richang Hong, Haojie Li, Zhiping Luo, and Yantao Zheng. 2009. NUS-WIDE: A real-world web image database from National University of Singapore. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval (CIVR’09). ACM, 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ritendra Datta, Dhiraj Joshi, Jia Li, and James Z. Wang. 2008. Image retrieval: Ideas, influences, and trends of the new age. Comput. Surv. 40, 2 (2008), 1–60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Janez Demšar. Jun. 2006. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7 (Jun. 2006), 1–30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. 2009. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’09). IEEE, 248–255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Pinar Duygulu, Kobus Barnard, Joao F. G. de Freitas, and David A. Forsyth. 2002. Object recognition as machine translation: Learning a lexicon for a fixed image vocabulary. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV’02). Springer, 97–112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hugo Jair Escalante, Carlos A. Hernández, Jesus A. Gonzalez, Aurelio López-López, Manuel Montes, Eduardo F. Morales, L. Enrique Sucar, Luis Villaseñor, and Michael Grubinger. 2010. The segmented and annotated IAPR TC-12 benchmark. Comput. Vis. Image Understand. 114, 4 (2010), 419–428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Shao Lei Feng, Raghavan Manmatha, and Victor Lavrenko. 2004. Multiple Bernoulli relevance models for image and video annotation. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’04), Vol. 2. IEEE, 1002–1009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. King Shy Goh, Edward Y. Chang, and Beitao Li. 2005. Using one-class and two-class SVMs for multiclass image annotation. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17, 10 (2005), 1333–1346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sally A Goldman and Yan Zhou. 2000. Enhancing supervised learning with unlabeled data. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’00). ACM, 327–334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Yunchao Gong, Yangqing Jia, Thomas Leung, Alexander Toshev, and Sergey Ioffe. 2013. Deep convolutional ranking for multilabel image annotation. arXiv:1312.4894. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.4894.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Matthieu Guillaumin, Thomas Mensink, Jakob Verbeek, and Cordelia Schmid. 2009. Tagprop: Discriminative metric learning in nearest neighbor models for image auto-annotation. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’09). IEEE, 309–316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2015. Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 37, 9 (2015), 1904–1916.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Thomas Hofmann. 2001. Unsupervised learning by probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Mach. Learn. 42, 1–2 (2001), 177–196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Jiwoon Jeon, Victor Lavrenko, and Raghavan Manmatha. 2003. Automatic image annotation and retrieval using cross-media relevance models. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Informaion Retrieval (SIGIR’03). ACM, 119–126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Liping Jing, Chenyang Shen, Liu Yang, Jian Yu, and Michael K. Ng. 2017. Multi-label classification by semi-supervised singular value decomposition. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26, 10 (2017), 4612–4625.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Xiao-Yuan Jing, Fei Wu, Zhiqiang Li, Ruimin Hu, and David Zhang. 2016. Multi-label dictionary learning for image annotation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 25, 6 (2016), 2712–2725.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Justin Johnson, Lamberto Ballan, and Li Fei-Fei. 2015. Love thy neighbors: Image annotation by exploiting image metadata. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’15). IEEE, 4624–4632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Xiao Ke, Mingke Zhou, Yuzhen Niu, and Wenzhong Guo. Nov. 2017. Data equilibrium based automatic image annotation by fusing deep model and semantic propagation. Pattern Recogn. 71 (Nov. 2017), 60–77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2012. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’12). MIT Press, 1106–1114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Victor Lavrenko, Raghavan Manmatha, and Jiwoon Jeon. 2004. A model for learning the semantics of pictures. In Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’04). MIT Press, 553–560.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhixin Li, Lingzhi Li, Kaobi Yan, and Canlong Zhang. 2017. Automatic image annotation using fuzzy association rules and decision tree. Multimedia Syst. 23, 6 (2017), 679–690.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Zhixin Li, Lan Lin, Canlong Zhang, Huifang Ma, and Weizhong Zhao. 2019. Collaborating CNN and SVM for automatic image annotation. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval (ICMR’19). ACM, 63–67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Zechao Li, Jing Liu, Changsheng Xu, and Hanqing Lu. 2013. MLRank: Multi-correlation learning to rank for image annotation. Pattern Recogn. 46, 10 (2013), 2700–2710.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Zhixin Li, Zhiping Shi, Xi Liu, and Zhongzhi Shi. 2011. Modeling continuous visual features for semantic image annotation and retrieval. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 32, 3 (2011), 516–523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zhixin Li, Zhongzhi Shi, Weizhong Zhao, Zhiqing Li, and Zhenjun Tang. 2013. Learning semantic concepts from image database with hybrid generative/discriminative approach. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 26, 9 (2013), 2143–2152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Ameesh Makadia, Vladimir Pavlovic, and Sanjiv Kumar. 2010. Baselines for image annotation. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 90, 1 (2010), 88–105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Florent Monay and Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2007. Modeling semantic aspects for cross-media image indexing. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 29, 10 (2007), 1802–1817.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Venkatesh N. Murthy, Subhransu Maji, and R. Manmatha. 2015. Automatic image annotation using deep learning representations. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval (ICMR’15). ACM, 603–606.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Kamal Nigam and Rayid Ghani. 2000. Analyzing the effectiveness and applicability of co-training. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’00). ACM, 86–93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Maxime Oquab, Leon Bottou, Ivan Laptev, and Josef Sivic. 2014. Learning and transferring mid-level image representations using convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’14). 1717–1724.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Xiaojun Qi and Yutao Han. 2007. Incorporating multiple SVMs for automatic image annotation. Pattern Recogn. 40, 2 (2007), 728–741.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Jesse Read, Bernhard Pfahringer, Geoff Holmes, and Eibe Frank. 2011. Classifier chains for multi-label classification. Machine Learn. 85, 3 (2011), 254–269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv:1409.1556. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Chang Tang, Xinwang Liu, Pichao Wang, Changqing Zhang, Miaomiao Li, and Lizhe Wang. 2019. Adaptive hypergraph embedded semi-supervised multi-label image annotation. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 21, 11 (2019), 2837–2849.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Amara Tariq and Hassan Foroosh. Jan. 2018. Designing a symmetric classifier for image annotation using multi-layer sparse coding. Image Vis. Comput. 69 (Jan. 2018), 33–43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Tiberio Uricchio, Lamberto Ballan, Lorenzo Seidenari, and Alberto Del Bimbo. Nov. 2017. Automatic image annotation via label transfer in the semantic space. Pattern Recogn. 71 (Nov. 2017), 144–157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Yashaswi Verma. Sept. 2019. Diverse image annotation with missing labels. Pattern Recogn. 93 (Sept. 2019), 470–484.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Yashaswi Verma and C. V. Jawahar. 2017. Image annotation by propagating labels from semantic neighbourhoods. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 121, 1 (2017), 126–148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Luis Von Ahn and Laura Dabbish. 2004. Labeling images with a computer game. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 319–326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Fei Wu, Zhuhao Wang, Zhongfei Zhang, Yi Yang, Jiebo Luo, Wenwu Zhu, and Yueting Zhuang. 2015. Weakly semi-supervised deep learning for multi-label image annotation. IEEE Trans. Big Data 1, 3 (2015), 109–122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Yuying Xing, Guoxian Yu, Carlotta Domeniconi, Jun Wang, and Zili Zhang. 2018. Multi-label co-training. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’18). 2882–2888.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Wang Zhan and Minling Zhang. 2017. Inductive semi-supervised multi-label learning with co-training. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’17). ACM, 1305–1314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Dengsheng Zhang, Md Monirul Islam, and Guojun Lu. 2012. A review on automatic image annotation techniques. Pattern Recogn. 45, 1 (2012), 346–362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Shaoting Zhang, Junzhou Huang, Yuchi Huang, Yang Yu, Hongsheng Li, and Dimitris N. Metaxas. 2010. Automatic image annotation using group sparsity. In Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’10). IEEE, 3312–3319.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Mingbo Zhao, Tommy W. S. Chow, Zhao Zhang, and Bing Li. Mar. 2015. Automatic image annotation via compact graph based semi-supervised learning. Knowl.-Based Syst. 76 (Mar. 2015), 148–165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Tao Zhou, Zhixin Li, Canlong Zhang, and Huifang Ma. 2020. Classify multi-label images via improved CNN model with adversarial network. Multimedia Tools Appl. 79, 9–10 (2020), 6871–6890.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Xiaojin Zhu. 2007. Semi-supervised Learning Literature Survey. Technical Report. University of Wisconsin—Madison.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Semi-supervised Learning Approach Based on Adaptive Weighted Fusion for Automatic Image Annotation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
        ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 17, Issue 1
        February 2021
        392 pages
        ISSN:1551-6857
        EISSN:1551-6865
        DOI:10.1145/3453992
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2021 Association for Computing Machinery.

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 April 2021
        • Accepted: 1 September 2020
        • Revised: 1 July 2020
        • Received: 1 February 2020
        Published in tomm Volume 17, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format