skip to main content
10.1145/3427423.3427440acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessietConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning experience evaluation of indonesia online tutoring mobile application using heuristic for E-learning

Published:28 December 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ruang Guru has been Indonesia's most popular online tutoring platform in 2019. This platform is intended for primary to high school students in understanding school curriculums, as well as helping with exams. However, teens may have a low success rate because of their overconfident behavior. Their undeveloped skills require simple and relatable applications. This fact raises the question of whether teenage students are able to learn through this e-learning. This study aims to find user experience problems in this e-learning application that might impact student learning success. The evaluation of the learning experience of e-learning should not only be related to usability but also instructional design aspects. This study evaluates an online tutor mobile application using the heuristic evaluation method by referring to the usability and instructional design heuristics. The results found 28 problems. Some problems were beyond determined heuristics. The mean calculation of severity level indicates minor problems that have a low improvement priority.

References

  1. M Arshavskiy. 2013. Instructional Design for ELearning: Essential Guide to Creating Successful ELearning Courses. Your eLearning World. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=aoHanQEACAAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Luciana Freire, Pedro Arezes, and José Campos. 2012. A literature review about usability evaluation methods for e-learning platforms. Work 41, (2012), 1038--1044. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Marc Hassenzahl. 2005. The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship Between User and Product.. 31--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Marc Hassenzahl. 2008. User Experience (UX): Towards an Experiential Perspective on Product Quality. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on L'Interaction Homme-Machine (IHM '08), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. International Organization for Standardization. 2018. ISO 9241-11:2018 Ergonomics of human-system interaction --- Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jakob Joyce, Alita; Nielsen. 2019. Teenager's UX: Designing for Teens. Nielsen Norman Group, https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-of-webs. Retrieved July 20, 2020 from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-of-websites-for-teenagers/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Walter Nakamura, Elaine Oliveira, and Tayana Conte. 2018. TUXEL: A Technique for User experience Evaluation in e-Learning. In Anais dos Workshops do VII Congresso Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (CBIE 2018), Brazilian Computer Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Computação - {SBC}). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jakob Nielsen. 1992. Finding Usability Problems through Heuristic Evaluation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '92), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 373--380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jakob Nielsen. 1994. 10 Heuristics for User Interface Design: Article by Jakob Nielsen. Retrieved July 27, 2020 from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Heuristic Evaluation: How-To: Article by Jakob Nielsen. Retrieved August 4, 2020 from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-to-conduct-a-heuristic-evaluation/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Severity Ratings for Usability Problems: Article by Jakob Nielsen. Retrieved August 4, 2020 from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-to-rate-the-severity-of-usability-problems/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jakob Nielsen. 1995. Usability Problems Found by Heuristic Evaluation (Jakob Nielsen). Retrieved August 4, 2020 from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-problems-found-by-heuristic-evaluation/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. T Reeves, Lisa Benson, Dean Elliott, Michael Grant, Doug Holschuh, Beaumie Kim, Hyeonjin Kim, Erick Lauber, and Christian Loh. 2002. Usability and Instructional Design Heuristics for E-Learning Evaluation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Euphemia Wong. 2020. Heuristic Evaluation: How to Conduct a Heuristic Evaluation | Interaction Design Foundation. Retrieved August 4, 2020 from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/heuristic-evaluation-how-to-conduct-a-heuristic-evaluationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rosa Yáñez Gómez, Daniel Cascado Caballero, and José-Luis Sevillano. 2014. Heuristic Evaluation on Mobile Interfaces: A New Checklist. Sci. World J. 2014, (2014), 434326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Panagiotis Zaharias. 2008. Cross-Cultural Differences in Perceptions of E-Learning Usability: An Empirical Investigation. J. Technol. Hum. Interact. 4, (2008), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Panagiotis Zaharias, Konstantina Vassilopoulou, and Angeliki Poulymenakou. 2002. Designing On-Line Learning Courses: Implications for Usability. Sci. J. Appl. Inf. Technol. 1, (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ruangguru. Retrieved July 20, 2020 from https://ruangguru.com/general/aboutGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Learning experience evaluation of indonesia online tutoring mobile application using heuristic for E-learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SIET '20: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology
      November 2020
      277 pages
      ISBN:9781450376051
      DOI:10.1145/3427423

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 December 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIET '20 Paper Acceptance Rate45of57submissions,79%Overall Acceptance Rate45of57submissions,79%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader