skip to main content
10.1145/3427423.3427461acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessietConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Survey of automated meeting scheduling approaches

Published:28 December 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many studies have proposed automated meeting scheduling using various approaches and constraints. To build an automated meeting scheduler, we need to examine which approach and constraints suitable for our needs. Unfortunately, we have not found any literature survey that specifically discusses automated meeting schedulers based on the approaches and constraints. To achieve our needs, we did a literature survey from three digital libraries, ACM Digital Library, IEEE, and Springers. We collected, selected, and classified papers in the last decade. We classified the selected papers using four criteria, expressiveness, privacy-preserving, architecture, and approach. Through this classification, we expect an overview of how existing automated meeting scheduling has been built. As a result, we found out that there are significant constraints such as time, priorities, location, and quorum. Privacy-preserving is considered by some studies. The drawback to privacy-preserving is the complexity increase. Even though the centralized architecture is less complex, the most automated meeting scheduler is built-in decentralized architecture. The automated meeting scheduler is mostly built using agent-based approach.

References

  1. R. M. Grant, "Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm," Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 17, no. SUPPL. WINTER, pp. 109--122, 1996 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. L. Garrido-Luna and K. Sycara, "Towards a totally distributed meeting scheduling system," Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 1137, pp. 85--97, 1996 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. F. Kelley and A. Chapanis, "How professional persons keep their calendars: Implications for computerization," J. Occup. Psychol., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 241--256, 1982 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. L. A. Palen, "Calendars on the New Frontier: Challenges of Groupware Technology," University of California, Irvine, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. E. Ephrati, G. Zlotkin, and J. S. Rosenschein, "Meet Your Destiny: A Non-manipulable Meeting Scheduler," CSCW, pp. 359--371, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Sen and E. H. Durfee, "A formal study of distributed meeting scheduling," Gr. Decis. Negot., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 265--289, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. L. Pinedo, Scheduling Theory, Algorithms, and Systems, Fifth Edit. New York: Springer, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Sen and E. H. Durfee, "Using temporal abstractions and cancellations for efficiency in automated meeting scheduling," Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Coop. Inf. Syst., pp. 163--172, 1993 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. L. Palen, "Social, Individual & Technological Issues for Groupware Calendar Systems," Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. factors Comput. Syst., no. May, pp. 17--24, 1999 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. DeSanctis and R. B. Gallupe, "A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems," Manage. Sci., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 589--609, 1987 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. R. J. Aumann, "Game Theory," Game Theory, pp. 1--53, 1989 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. R. B. Myerson, Game Theory. Harvard University Press, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. K. Yang, N. Pattan, A. Rivera, and M. Griss, "Multi-agent meeting scheduling using mobile context," Lect. Notes Inst. Comput. Sci. Soc. Telecommun. Eng., vol. 35 LNICST, pp. 223--235, 2010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. M. M. Hossain and E. Shakshuki, "A deliberative agent for Meeting Scheduling," Proc. - Int. Conf. Adv. Inf. Netw. Appl. AINA, pp. 732--739, 2013 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. O. Mussawar and K. Al-Wahedi, "Meeting scheduling using agent based modeling and multiagent decision making," Innov. Comput. Technol., pp. 252--257, 2013 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Niederer and A. Schatten, "Agent-based meeting scheduling support using mobile clients," 2nd Int. Conf. Appl. Digit. Inf. Web Technol. ICADIWT 2009, pp. 719--724, 2009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. E. M. Shakshuki and S. M. M. Hossain, "A personal meeting scheduling agent," Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 909--922, 2014 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. R. Rodrigues Pires De Mello, T. Angelo Gelaim, and R. Azambuja Silveira, "Negotiation strategies in multi-Agent systems for meeting scheduling," Proc. - 2018 44th Lat. Am. Comput. Conf. CLEI 2018, pp. 242--250, 2018 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. S. Al-Ratrout, F. Siewe, O. Al-Dabbas, and M. Al-Fawair, "Hybrid Multi-Agent Architecture (HMAA) for meeting scheduling," 2010 7th Int. Multi-Conference Syst. Signals Devices, SSD-10, 2010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. Gelain, M. S. Pini, F. Rossi, K. B. Venable, and T. Walsh, "A Local Search Approach for Incomplete Soft Constraint Problems: Experimental Results on Meeting Scheduling Problems," Lect. Notes iin Comput. Sci., vol. 10335, pp. 403--418, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. R. Ray and S. Kalady, "Efficient negotiation strategies in multi-agent meeting scheduling," 2009 Second ISECS Int. Colloq. Comput. Commun. Control. Manag. CCCM 2009, vol. 1, pp. 434--437, 2009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. V. Myllärniemi, O. Korjus, M. Raatikainen, T. Norja, and T. Männistö, "Meeting scheduling across heterogeneous calendars and organizations utilizing mobile devices and cloud services," ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., vol. 2014-Novem, no. January 2017, pp. 224--227, 2014 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Bouhouch, L. Chakir, and A. El Qadi, "Scheduling meeting solved by neural network and Min-conflict heuristic," in Colloquium in Information Science and Technology, CIST, 2017, pp. 773--778 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. R. Megasari, E. M. Husni, Kuspriyanto, and D. H. Widyantoro, "Negotiation strategies for meeting scheduling conflict management," Proc. - 2015 Int. Conf. Sci. Inf. Technol. Big Data Spectr. Futur. Inf. Econ. ICSITech 2015, pp. 276--281, 2016 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. K. Saruladha, C. Priya, and S. Rohini, "Distributed meeting scheduler - A knowledge based approach to schedule meetings," Proc. - Int. Conf. Comput. Intell. Multimed. Appl. ICCIMA 2007, vol. 2, pp. 110--115, 2008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. V. Antila, J. Mantyjarvi, and V. Kononen, "Optimizing meeting scheduling in collaborative mobile systems through distributed voting," 2010 8th IEEE Int. Conf. Pervasive Comput. Commun. Work. PERCOM Work. 2010, pp. 238--243, 2010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. B. P. Lim, M. van den Briel, S. Thi É Baux, R. Bent, and S. Backhaus, "Large neighborhood search for energy aware meeting scheduling in smart buildings," Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 9075, pp. 240--254, 2015 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. B. Chai, A. Costa, S. D. Ahipasaoglu, C. Yuen, and Z. Yang, "Optimal Meeting Scheduling in Smart Commercial Building for Energy Cost Reduction," IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3060--3069, 2018 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. O. K. Sahingoz, "Agent based meeting scheduling in hierarchical organizations," Proc. 2010 Int. Symp. Inf. Technol. - Syst. Dev. Appl. Knowl. Soc. ITSim'10, vol. 3, pp. 1519--1524, 2010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. T. Athaya, S. Munira, A. Zaman, S. A. Hossain, and C. A. B. M. H. Kabir, "A Proposed Algorithm and Architecture for Automated Meeting Scheduling and Document Management," 2018 21st Int. Conf. Comput. Inf. Technol. ICCIT 2018, no. March, pp. 1--6, 2019 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. C. S. Lee, M. H. Wang, M. H. Wu, C. Y. Hsu, Y. C. Lin, and S. J. Yen, "A type-2 fuzzy personal ontology for meeting scheduling system," 2010 IEEE World Congr. Comput. Intell. WCCI 2010, 2010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. A. Y. Tawfik and H. Al-Ani, "Meeting scheduling assembles Children in the Rectangular Forest," Proc. - 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM Int. Conf. Intell. Agent Technol. IAT 2009, vol. 2, pp. 445--449, 2009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. E. M. Shakshuki and S. M. M. Hossain, "A personal meeting scheduling agent," Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 909--922, 2014 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. M. C. Silaghi, "Meeting scheduling guaranteeing n/2-privacy and resistant to statistical analysis (applicable to any DisCSP)," in Proceedings - IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2004, 2004, pp. 711--715 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. F. Mattern and P. Sturm, "An automatic distributed calendar and appointment system," Microprocess. Microprogramming, vol. 27, no. 1--5, pp. 455--462, 1989 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. M. Wooldridge and P. Ciancarini, "Agent-oriented software engineering: The state of the art," Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 1957 LNCS, pp. 1--28, 2001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. G. Zlotkin and J. Rosenschein, "Negotiation and Task Sharing Among Autonomous Agents in Cooperative Domains," IJCAI, vol. 89, pp. 912--917, 1989, doi: 10.1.1.37.6707. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Survey of automated meeting scheduling approaches

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SIET '20: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology
      November 2020
      277 pages
      ISBN:9781450376051
      DOI:10.1145/3427423

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 December 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIET '20 Paper Acceptance Rate45of57submissions,79%Overall Acceptance Rate45of57submissions,79%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)26
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader