skip to main content
10.1145/3428361.3428390acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Research Agenda for Mixed Reality in Automated Vehicles

Published: 22 November 2020 Publication History

Abstract

With the increasing knowledge advancements and availability of mixed reality (MR), the number of its purposes and applications in vehicles rises. Mixed reality may help to increase road safety, support more immersive (non-) driving related activities, and finally enhance driving and passenger experience. MR may also be the enabling technology to increase trust and acceptance in automated vehicles and therefore help on the transition towards automated driving. Further, automated driving extends use cases of virtual reality and other immersive technologies. However, there are still a number of challenges with the use of mixed reality when applied in vehicles, and also several human factors issues need to be solved. This paper aims at presenting a research agenda for using mixed reality technology for automotive user interfaces (UIs) by identifying opportunities and challenges.

References

[1]
2019. AutomotiveUI ’19: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
[2]
Daimler AG. 2020. Meet the S-Class DIGITAL: ”My MBUX”. https://bit.ly/32fu9RU. Accessed: 2020-08-20.
[3]
Mayank Agrawal and Kavita Vemuri. 2019. Analyzing High Decibel Honking Effect on Driving Behavior Using VR and Bio-Sensors. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351516
[4]
Ignacio Alvarez, Laura Rumbel, and Robert Adams. 2015. Skyline: A Rapid Prototyping Driving Simulator for User Experience. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799290
[5]
Sang-Gyun An, Yongkwan Kim, Joon Hyub Lee, and Seok-Hyung Bae. 2017. Collaborative Experience Prototyping of Automotive Interior in VR with 3D Sketching and Haptic Helpers. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(Oldenburg, Germany) (AutomotiveUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1145/3122986.3123002
[6]
Ronald T Azuma. 1997. A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 6, 4(1997), 355–385.
[7]
Karlin Bark, Cuong Tran, Kikuo Fujimura, and Victor Ng-Thow-Hing. 2014. Personal Navi: Benefits of an augmented reality navigational aid using a see-thru 3D volumetric HUD. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, 1–8.
[8]
Tobias M. Benz, Bernhard Riedl, and Lewis L. Chuang. 2019. Projection Displays Induce Less Simulator Sickness than Head-Mounted Displays in a Real Vehicle Driving Simulator. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344515
[9]
Konrad Bielecki, Marten Bloch, Robin Schmidt, Daniel López Hernández, Marcel Baltzer, and Frank Flemisch. 2019. Tangible Virtual Reality in a Multi-User Environment. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351499
[10]
Marc-Philipp Böckle, Anna Pernestål Brenden, Maria Klingegård, Azra Habibovic, and Martijn Bout. 2017. SAV2P: Exploring the Impact of an Interface for Shared Automated Vehicles on Pedestrians’ Experience. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct(Oldenburg, Germany) (AutomotiveUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131726.3131765
[11]
Laura Boffi, Philipp Wintersberger, Paola Cesaretti, Giuseppe Mincolelli, and Andreas Riener. 2019. The First Co-Drive Experience Prototype. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351318
[12]
Adam Bolton, Gary Burnett, and David R Large. 2015. An Investigation of Augmented Reality Presentations of Landmark-Based Navigation Using a Head-up Display. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799253
[13]
Adam Bolton, Gary Burnett, and David R Large. 2015. An investigation of augmented reality presentations of landmark-based navigation using a head-up display. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, 56–63.
[14]
Martijn Bout, Anna Pernestål Brenden, Maria Klingegård, Azra Habibovic, and Marc-Philipp Böckle. 2017. A Head-Mounted Display to Support Teleoperations of Shared Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct (Oldenburg, Germany) (AutomotiveUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131726.3131758
[15]
D. A. Bowman and R. P. McMahan. 2007. Virtual Reality: How Much Immersion Is Enough?Computer 40, 7 (2007), 36–43.
[16]
Doug A Bowman and Ryan P McMahan. 2007. Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough?Computer 40, 7 (2007), 36–43.
[17]
Roland Bremond, Jean Michel Auberlet, Viola Cavallo, Lara Désiré, Vérane FAURE, Sophie Lemonnier, Régis Lobjois, and Jean Philippe Tarel. 2014. Where we look when we drive: A multidisciplinary approach. In TRA - Transport Research Arena. Paris, France, 10p. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01044746
[18]
Karel A. Brookhuis and Dick [de Waard]. 2010. Monitoring drivers’ mental workload in driving simulators using physiological measures. Accident Analysis and Prevention 42, 3 (2010), 898 – 903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.001 Assessing Safety with Driving Simulators.
[19]
Nora Broy, Florian Alt, Stefan Schneegass, and Bastian Pfleging. 2014. 3D Displays in Cars: Exploring the User Performance for a Stereoscopic Instrument Cluster. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Seattle, WA, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667319
[20]
Nora Broy, Mengbing Guo, Stefan Schneegass, Bastian Pfleging, and Florian Alt. 2015. Introducing Novel Technologies in the Car: Conducting a Real-World Study to Test 3D Dashboards. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799280
[21]
Stuart Buck. 2015. Solving reproducibility.
[22]
Dan Calatayud, Sonal Arora, Rajesh Aggarwal, Irina Kruglikova, Svend Schulze, Peter Funch-Jensen, and Teodor Grantcharov. 2010. Warm-up in a virtual reality environment improves performance in the operating room. Annals of surgery 251, 6 (2010), 1181–1185.
[23]
Chia-Ming Chang, Koki Toda, Daisuke Sakamoto, and Takeo Igarashi. 2017. Eyes on a Car: An Interface Design for Communication between an Autonomous Car and a Pedestrian. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(Oldenburg, Germany) (AutomotiveUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/3122986.3122989
[24]
Ashley Colley, Jonna Häkkilä, Bastian Pfleging, and Florian Alt. 2017. A Design Space for External Displays on Cars. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct(Oldenburg, Germany) (AutomotiveUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131726.3131760
[25]
Mark Colley, Marcel Walch, and Enrico Rukzio. 2019. For a Better (Simulated) World: Considerations for VR in External Communication Research. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 442–449. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351523
[26]
SAE On-Road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee. 2018. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems.
[27]
Jan Conrad, Dieter Wallach, Arthur Barz, Daniel Kerpen, Tobias Puderer, and Andreas Weisenburg. 2019. Concept Simulator K3F: A Flexible Framework for Driving Simulations. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3349596
[28]
Joost C.F. [de Winter], Riender Happee, Marieke H. Martens, and Neville A. Stanton. 2014. Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27 (2014), 196 – 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.016 Vehicle Automation and Driver Behaviour.
[29]
Shuchisnigdha Deb, Lesley J Strawderman, and Daniel W Carruth. 2018. Investigating pedestrian suggestions for external features on fully autonomous vehicles: A virtual reality experiment. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 59 (2018), 135–149.
[30]
Cyriel Diels and Jelte E. Bos. 2016. Self-driving carsickness. Applied Ergonomics 53(2016), 374 – 382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.009 Transport in the 21st Century: The Application of Human Factors to Future User Needs.
[31]
Cyriel Diels, Jelte E. Bos, Katharina Hottelart, and Patrice Reilhac. 2016. Motion Sickness in Automated Vehicles: The Elephant in the Room. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40503-2_10
[32]
Igor Doric, Anna-Katharina Frison, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, Sebastian Wittmann, Matheus Zimmermann, and Thomas Brandmeier. 2016. A Novel Approach for Researching Crossing Behavior and Risk Acceptance: The Pedestrian Simulator. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’16 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3004323.3004324
[33]
Mark H Draper. 1998. The Adaptive Effects Of Virtual Interfaces: Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex and Simulator Sickness.Technical Report. AIR FORCE INST OF TECH WRIGHT-PATTERSONAFB OH.
[34]
Mahdi Ebnali, Cyrus Kian, Majid Ebnali-Heidari, and Adel Mazloumi. 2020. User Experience in Immersive VR-Based Serious Game: An Application in Highly Automated Driving Training. In Advances in Human Factors of Transportation, Neville Stanton (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 133–144.
[35]
Nadia Fereydooni, Orit Shaer, and Andrew L. Kun. 2019. Switching between Augmented Reality and a Manual-Visual Task: A Preliminary Study. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351502
[36]
Joseph L Gabbard, Gregory M Fitch, and Hyungil Kim. 2014. Behind the Glass: Driver challenges and opportunities for AR automotive applications. Proc. IEEE 102, 2 (2014), 124–136.
[37]
Inc. Gartner. [n.d.]. Interpreting Technology Hype. https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/gartner-hype-cycle. Accessed: 2020-05-07.
[38]
Inc. Gartner. 2014. Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/2809728/hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies-2014. Accessed: 2020-05-07.
[39]
Inc. Gartner. 2019. Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3956015/hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies-2019. Accessed: 2020-05-07.
[40]
Jean-Michael Georg, Johannes Feiler, Frank Diermeyer, and Markus Lienkamp. 2018. Teleoperated Driving, a Key Technology for Automated Driving? Comparison of Actual Test Drives with a Head Mounted Display and Conventional Monitors. In 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, 3403–3408.
[41]
Michael A. Gerber, Ronald Schroeter, and Julia Vehns. 2019. A Video-Based Automated Driving Simulator for Automotive UI Prototyping, UX and Behaviour Research. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344533
[42]
David Goedicke, Jamy Li, Vanessa Evers, and Wendy Ju. 2018. Vr-oom: Virtual reality on-road driving simulation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.
[43]
Christian Gold, Moritz Körber, David Lechner, and Klaus Bengler. 2016. Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations: The Role of Traffic Density. Human Factors 58, 4 (2016), 642–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816634226 26984515.
[44]
Uwe Gruenefeld, Sebastian Weiß, Andreas Löcken, Isabella Virgilio, Andrew L. Kun, and Susanne Boll. 2019. VRoad: Gesture-Based Interaction between Pedestrians and Automated Vehicles in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351511
[45]
Renate Haeuslschmid, Laura Schnurr, Julie Wagner, and Andreas Butz. 2015. Contact-Analog Warnings on Windshield Displays Promote Monitoring the Road Scene. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799274
[46]
Jonna Häkkilä, Ashley Colley, and Juho Rantakari. 2014. Exploring Mixed Reality Window Concept for Car Passengers. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Seattle, WA, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667239.2667288
[47]
Kyle Harrington, David R. Large, Gary Burnett, and Orestis Georgiou. 2018. Exploring the Use of Mid-Air Ultrasonic Feedback to Enhance Automotive User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239089
[48]
M. Hartmann, M. Viehweger, W. Desmet, M. Stolz, and D. Watzenig. 2017. “Pedestrian in the loop”: An approach using virtual reality. In 2017 XXVI International Conference on Information, Communication and Automation Technologies (ICAT). 1–8.
[49]
Renate Häuslschmid, Max von Buelow, Bastian Pfleging, and Andreas Butz. 2017. Supportingtrust in autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 319–329.
[50]
Renate Häuslschmid, Max von Bülow, Bastian Pfleging, and Andreas Butz. 2017. SupportingTrust in Autonomous Driving. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Limassol, Cyprus) (IUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025171.3025198
[51]
Lawrence J. Hettinger and Gary E. Riccio. 1992. Visually Induced Motion Sickness in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1, 3(1992), 306–310. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.3.306
[52]
Philipp Hock, Johannes Kraus, Franziska Babel, Marcel Walch, Enrico Rukzio, and Martin Baumann. 2018. How to Design Valid Simulator Studies for Investigating User Experience in Automated Driving: Review and Hands-On Considerations. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. 105–117.
[53]
Philipp Hock, Johannes Kraus, Marcel Walch, Nina Lang, and Martin Baumann. 2016. Elaborating Feedback Strategies for Maintaining Automation in Highly Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (Automotive’UI 16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005414
[54]
Kai Holländer, Philipp Wintersberger, and Andreas Butz. 2019. Overtrust in External Cues of Automated Vehicles: An Experimental Investigation. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344528
[55]
Renate Häuslschmid, Donghao Ren, Florian Alt, Andreas Butz, and Tobias Höllerer. 2019. Personalizing Content Presentation on Large 3D Head-Up Displays. PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality 27, 1 (2019), 80–106. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00315
[56]
Quinate Chioma Ihemedu-Steinke, Rainer Erbach, Prashanth Halady, Gerrit Meixner, and Michael Weber. 2017. Virtual reality driving simulator based on head-mounted displays. In Automotive user interfaces. Springer, 401–428.
[57]
Quinate Chioma Ihemedu-Steinke, Prashanth Halady, Gerrit Meixner, and Michael Weber. 2018. VR Evaluation of Motion Sickness Solution in Automated Driving. In Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Interaction, Navigation, Visualization, Embodiment, and Simulation, Jessie Y.C. Chen and Gino Fragomeni (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 112–125.
[58]
Hillary Page Ive, Wendy Ju, and Kirstin Kohler. 2014. Quantitative Measures of User Experience in Autonomous Driving Simulators. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Seattle, WA, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667239.2667312
[59]
Christian P. Janssen, Andrew L. Kun, Stephen Brewster, Linda Ng Boyle, Duncan P. Brumby, and Lewis L. Chuang. 2019. Exploring the Concept of the (Future) Mobile Office. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 465–467. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3349600
[60]
Jinki Jung, Hyeopwoo Lee, Jeehye Choi, Abhilasha Nanda, Uwe Gruenefeld, Tim Stratmann, and Wilko Heuten. 2018. Ensuring safety in augmented reality from trade-off between immersion and situation awareness. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE, 70–79.
[61]
Andreas Kasprzok and J. David Smith. 2014. Dash Designer: A Multi-Modal Design Tool for Vehicle Interactivity. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Seattle, WA, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667239.2667278
[62]
Kellie D Kennedy and James P Bliss. 2013. Inattentional blindness in a simulated driving task. In proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 57. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1899–1903.
[63]
Robert S. Kennedy, Norman E. Lane, Kevin S. Berbaum, and Michael G. Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3, 3 (1993), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3
[64]
Kathrin Knutzen, Florian Weidner, and Wolfgang Broll. 2019. Talk to Me! Exploring Stereoscopic 3D Anthropomorphic Virtual Assistants in Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351503
[65]
A. Koilias, C. Mousas, B. Rekabdar, and C. Anagnostopoulos. 2019. Passenger Anxiety when Seated in a Virtual Reality Self-Driving Car. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 1024–1025.
[66]
Sven Krome, David Goedicke, Thomas J. Matarazzo, Zimeng Zhu, Zhenwei Zhang, J. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, and Wendy Ju. 2019. How People Experience Autonomous Intersections: Taking a First-Person Perspective. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344520
[67]
Andrew L. Kun. 2018. Human-Machine Interaction for Vehicles: Review and Outlook. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 11, 4(2018), 201–293.
[68]
Andrew L Kun, Susanne Boll, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2016. Shifting gears: User interfaces in the age of autonomous driving. IEEE Pervasive Computing 15, 1 (2016), 32–38.
[69]
Andrew L Kun, Hidde van der Meulen, and Christian P Janssen. 2017. Calling while driving: An initial experiment with HoloLens. (2017).
[70]
Alexander Kunze, Stephen J. Summerskill, Russell Marshall, and Ashleigh J. Filtness. 2017. Enhancing Driving Safety and User Experience Through Unobtrusive and Function-Specific Feedback. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct(Oldenburg, Germany) (AutomotiveUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131726.3131762
[71]
Alexander Kunze, Stephen J. Summerskill, Russell Marshall, and Ashleigh J. Filtness. 2018. Augmented Reality Displays for Communicating Uncertainty Information in Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239074
[72]
Ramesh Lagoo, Vassilis Charissis, and David K Harrison. 2019. Mitigating Driver’s Distraction: Automotive Head-Up Display and Gesture Recognition System. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine 8, 5 (2019), 79–85.
[73]
Sabine Langlois and Boussaad Soualmi. 2016. Augmented reality versus classical HUD to take over from automated driving: An aid to smooth reactions and to anticipate maneuvers. In 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, 1571–1578.
[74]
David R. Large, Gary Burnett, Ben Anyasodo, and Lee Skrypchuk. 2016. Assessing Cognitive Demand during Natural Language Interactions with a Digital Driving Assistant. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (Automotive’UI 16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005408
[75]
Felix Lauber, Claudius Böttcher, and Andreas Butz. 2014. PapAR: Paper Prototyping for Augmented Reality. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Seattle, WA, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667239.2667271
[76]
Felix Lauber, Claudius Böttcher, and Andreas Butz. 2014. You’ve Got the Look: Visualizing Infotainment Shortcuts in Head-Mounted Displays. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Seattle, WA, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667408
[77]
Hieu Lê, Tuan Long Pham, and Gerrit Meixner. 2017. A Concept For A Virtual Reality Driving Simulation In Combination With A Real Car. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct (Oldenburg, Germany) (AutomotiveUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131726.3131742
[78]
Yee Mun Lee, Ruth Madigan, Jorge Garcia, Andrew Tomlinson, Albert Solernou, Richard Romano, Gustav Markkula, Natasha Merat, and Jim Uttley. 2019. Understanding the Messages Conveyed by Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344546
[79]
Yeti Li, Murat Dikmen, Thana G. Hussein, Yahui Wang, and Catherine Burns. 2018. To Cross or Not to Cross: Urgency-Based External Warning Displays on Autonomous Vehicles to Improve Pedestrian Crossing Safety. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239082
[80]
Patrick Lindemann, Niklas Müller, and Gerhard Rigolll. 2019. Exploring the Use of Augmented Reality Interfaces for Driver Assistance in Short-Notice Takeovers. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, 804–809.
[81]
Patrick Lindemann and Gerhard Rigoll. 2017. Examining the Impact of See-Through Cockpits on Driving Performance in a Mixed Reality Prototype. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct(Oldenburg, Germany) (AutomotiveUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131726.3131754
[82]
Lee Lisle, Kyle Tanous, Hyungil Kim, Joseph L. Gabbard, and Doug A. Bowman. 2018. Effect of Volumetric Displays on Depth Perception in Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239083
[83]
Andreas Löcken, Carmen Golling, and Andreas Riener. 2019. How Should Automated Vehicles Interact with Pedestrians? A Comparative Analysis of Interaction Concepts in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344544
[84]
Mike Long, Gary Burnett, Robert Hardy, and Harriet Allen. 2015. Depth Discrimination between Augmented Reality and Real-World Targets for Vehicle Head-up Displays. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799292
[85]
Pietro Lungaro, Konrad Tollmar, and Thomas Beelen. 2017. Human-to-AI Interfaces for Enabling Future Onboard Experiences. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct (Oldenburg, Germany) (AutomotiveUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131726.3131737
[86]
Pietro Lungaro, Konrad Tollmar, Firdose Saeik, Conrado Mateu Gisbert, and Gaël Dubus. 2018. DriverSense: A Hyper-Realistic Testbed for the Design and Evaluation of Novel User Interfaces in Self-Driving Vehicles. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239092.3265955
[87]
Mark McGill and Stephen Brewster. 2019. Virtual Reality Passenger Experiences. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351330
[88]
Mark McGill, Alexander Ng, and Stephen Brewster. 2017. I am the passenger: how visual motion cues can influence sickness for in-car VR. In Proceedings of the 2017 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 5655–5668.
[89]
Vivien Melcher, Stefan Rauh, Frederik Diederichs, Harald Widlroither, and Wilhelm Bauer. 2015. Take-Over Requests for Automated Driving. Procedia Manufacturing 3(2015), 2867 – 2873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.788 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015.
[90]
Coleman Merenda, Hyungil Kim, Joseph L. Gabbard, Samantha Leong, David R. Large, and Gary Burnett. 2017. Did You See Me? Assessing Perceptual vs. Real Driving Gains Across Multi-Modal Pedestrian Alert Systems. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(Oldenburg, Germany) (AutomotiveUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3122986.3123013
[91]
Paul Milgram, Haruo Takemura, Akira Utsumi, and Fumio Kishino. 1995. Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In Telemanipulator and telepresence technologies, Vol. 2351. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 282–292.
[92]
David Miller, Mishel Johns, Brian Mok, Nikhil Gowda, David Sirkin, Key Lee, and Wendy Ju. 2016. Behavioral measurement of trust in automation: the trust fall. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 60. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1849–1853.
[93]
Pranav Mistry, Tsuyoshi Kuroki, and Chaochi Chang. 2008. TaPuMa: Tangible Public Map for Information Acquirement through the Things We Carry. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Ambient Media and Systems (Quebec, Canada) (Ambi-Sys ’08). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), Brussels, BEL, Article 12, 5 pages.
[94]
Brian Mok and Wendy Ju. 2014. The Push vs Pull of Information between Autonomous Cars and Human Drivers. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Seattle, WA, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667239.2667287
[95]
Mohammad Mehdi Moniri and Christian Müller. 2014. EyeVIUS: Intelligent Vehicles in Intelligent Urban Spaces. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Seattle, WA, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667239.2667265
[96]
Dylan Moore, Rebecca Currano, David Sirkin, Azra Habibovic, Victor Malmsten Lundgren, Debargha (Dave) Dey, and Kai Holländer. 2019. Wizards of WoZ: Using Controlled and Field Studies to Evaluate AV-Pedestrian Interactions. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3350756
[97]
Atsuo Murata. 2004. Effects of Duration of Immersion in a Virtual Reality Environment on Postural Stability. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 17, 4(2004), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1704_2
[98]
Stefan Neumeier, Philipp Wintersberger, Anna-Katharina Frison, Armin Becher, Christian Facchi, and Andreas Riener. 2019. Teleoperation: The Holy Grail to Solve Problems of Automated Driving? Sure, but Latency Matters. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344534
[99]
Trung Thanh Nguyen, Kai Holländer, Marius Hoggenmueller, Callum Parker, and Martin Tomitsch. 2019. Designing for Projection-Based Communication between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344543
[100]
Don Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books.
[101]
Byoung-Jun Park, Changrak Yoon, Jeong-Woo Lee, and Kyong-Ho Kim. 2015. Augmented reality based on driving situation awareness in vehicle. In 2015 17th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT). IEEE, 593–595.
[102]
Ingrid Pettersson, Florian Lachner, Anna-Katharina Frison, Andreas Riener, and Andreas Butz. 2018. A Bermuda Triangle? A Review of Method Application and Triangulation in User Experience Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174035
[103]
Bastian Pfleging, Michael Kienast, Albrecht Schmidt, Tanja Döring, 2011. Speet: A multimodal interaction style combining speech and touch interaction in automotive environments. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI, Vol. 11.
[104]
Bastian Pfleging, Maurice Rang, and Nora Broy. 2016. Investigating User Needs for Non-Driving-Related Activities during Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Rovaniemi, Finland) (MUM ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1145/3012709.3012735
[105]
Matthew J. Pitts, Lee Skrypchuk, Alex Attridge, and Mark A. Williams. 2014. Comparing the User Experience of Touchscreen Technologies in an Automotive Application. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Seattle, WA, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667418
[106]
Diana Reich and Rainer Stark. 2014. “To See or Not to See?” How Do Eye Movements Change Within Immersive Driving Environments. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Seattle, WA, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667239.2667268
[107]
Andreas Riegler, Bilal Aksoy, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2020. Gaze-based Interaction with Windshield Displays for Automated Driving: Impact of Dwell Time and Feedback Design on Task Performance and Subjective Workload. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. 151–160.
[108]
Andreas Riegler, Andrew L Kun, Stephen Brewster, Andreas Riener, Joe Gabbard, and Carolin Wienrich. 2019. MRV 2019: 3rd workshop on mixed reality for intelligent vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings. 38–44.
[109]
Andreas Riegler, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2019. Adaptive Dark Mode: Investigating Text and Transparency of Windshield Display Content for Automated Driving. In Mensch und Computer 2019 (Hamburg, Germany). 8. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2019-ws-612
[110]
Andreas Riegler, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2019. AutoWSD: Virtual Reality Automated Driving Simulator for Rapid HCI Prototyping. In Mensch und Computer 2019 (Hamburg, Germany). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3345366
[111]
Andreas Riegler, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2019. Towards Dynamic Positioning of Text Content on a Windshield Display for Automated Driving. In 25th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Parramatta, NSW, Australia) (VRST ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 94, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359996.3364757
[112]
Andreas Riegler, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2019. Virtual Reality Driving Simulator for User Studies on Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 502–507. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3349595
[113]
Andreas Riegler, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2018. Investigating User Preferences for Windshield Displays in Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Munich, Germany) (PerDis ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205885
[114]
Andreas Riegler, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2019. Augmented Reality Windshield Displays and Their Potential to Enhance User Experience in Automated Driving. i-com 18, 2 (2019), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2018-0033
[115]
Andreas Riener, Myounghoon Jeon, Ignacio Alvarez, and Anna K. Frison. 2017. Driver in the Loop: Best Practices in Automotive Sensing and Feedback Mechanisms. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 295–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49448-7_11
[116]
Florian Roider and Tom Gross. 2018. I See Your Point: Integrating Gaze to Enhance Pointing Gesture Accuracy While Driving. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239084
[117]
Taishi Sawabe, Masayuki Kanbara, and Norihiro Hagita. 2016. Diminished reality for acceleration—Motion sickness reduction with vection for autonomous driving. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct). IEEE, 297–299.
[118]
Taishi Sawabe, Masayuki Kanbara, and Norihiro Hagita. 2017. Diminished reality for acceleration stimulus: Motion sickness reduction with vection for autonomous driving. In 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). IEEE, 277–278.
[119]
Mark C Schall Jr, Michelle L Rusch, John D Lee, Jeffrey D Dawson, Geb Thomas, Nazan Aksan, and Matthew Rizzo. 2013. Augmented reality cues and elderly driver hazard perception. Human factors 55, 3 (2013), 643–658.
[120]
Clemens Schartmüller, Klemens Weigl, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Marco Steinhauser. 2019. Text Comprehension: Heads-Up vs. Auditory Displays: Implications for a Productive Work Environment in SAE Level 3 Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 342–354. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344547
[121]
Matthias Schneider, Anna Bruder, Marc Necker, Tim Schluesener, Niels Henze, and Christian Wolff. 2019. A Field Study to Collect Expert Knowledge for the Development of AR HUD Navigation Concepts. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 358–362. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351339
[122]
Sonja Schneider, Madeleine Ratter, and Klaus Bengler. 2019. Pedestrian behavior in virtual reality: effects of gamification and distraction. In Proceedings of the Road Safety and Simulation Conference.
[123]
Nadja Schömig, Katharina Wiedemann, Frederik Naujoks, Alexandra Neukum, Bettina Leuchtenberg, and Thomas Vöhringer-Kuhnt. 2018. An Augmented Reality Display for Conditionally Automated Driving. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239092.3265956
[124]
Ronald Schroeter and Michael A. Gerber. 2018. A Low-Cost VR-Based Automated Driving Simulator for Rapid Automotive UI Prototyping. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 248–251. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239092.3267418
[125]
Ronald Schroeter, Jim Oxtoby, and Daniel Johnson. 2014. AR and Gamification Concepts to Reduce Driver Boredom and Risk Taking Behaviours. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Seattle, WA, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667415
[126]
Ronald Schroeter and Fabius Steinberger. 2016. Pokémon DRIVE: Towards Increased Situational Awareness in Semi-Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (Launceston, Tasmania, Australia) (OzCHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010973
[127]
Valentin Schwind, Pascal Knierim, Nico Haas, and Niels Henze. 2019. Using presence questionnaires in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.
[128]
Bobbie D. Seppelt and John D. Lee. 2019. Keeping the driver in the loop: Dynamic feedback to support appropriate use of imperfect vehicle control automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 125 (2019), 66 – 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.12.009
[129]
Shervin Shahrdar, Corey Park, and Mehrdad Nojoumian. 2019. Human Trust Measurement Using an Immersive Virtual Reality Autonomous Vehicle Simulator. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (Honolulu, HI, USA) (AIES ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314264
[130]
S Tarek Shahriar and Andrew L Kun. 2018. Camera-View Augmented Reality: Overlaying Navigation Instructions on a Real-Time View of the Road. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, 146–154.
[131]
Ben Shneiderman and Catherine Plaisant. 2010. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Pearson Education India.
[132]
Bryant Walker Smith. 2017. Automated driving and product liability. Mich. St. L. Rev. (2017), 1.
[133]
Bryant Walker Smith. 2017. How governments can promote automated driving. NML Rev. 47(2017), 99.
[134]
Missie Smith, Jillian Streeter, Gary Burnett, and Joseph L. Gabbard. 2015. Visual Search Tasks: The Effects of Head-up Displays on Driving and Task Performance. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799291
[135]
Ye Eun Song, Christian Lehsing, Tanja Fuest, and Klaus Bengler. 2018. External HMIs and their effect on the interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles. In International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration. Springer, 13–18.
[136]
Alessandro Soro, Andry Rakotonirainy, Ronald Schroeter, and Sabine Wollstädter. 2014. Using Augmented Video to Test In-Car User Experiences of Context Analog HUDs. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Seattle, WA, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667239.2667302
[137]
D. Sportillo, A. Paljic, and L. Ojeda. 2019. On-Road Evaluation of Autonomous Driving Training. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 182–190.
[138]
Fabius Steinberger, Ronald Schroeter, Verena Lindner, Zachary Fitz-Walter, Joshua Hall, and Daniel Johnson. 2015. Zombies on the Road: A Holistic Design Approach to Balancing Gamification and Safe Driving. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799260
[139]
Jonathan Steuer. 1992. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of communication 42, 4 (1992), 73–93.
[140]
Bethan Hannah Topliss, Sanna M. Pampel, Gary Burnett, and Joseph L. Gabbard. 2019. Evaluating Head-Up Displays across Windshield Locations. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344524
[141]
Bethan Hannah Topliss, Sanna M Pampel, Gary Burnett, Lee Skrypchuk, and Chrisminder Hare. 2018. Establishing the Role of a Virtual Lead Vehicle as a Novel Augmented Reality Navigational Aid. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239069
[142]
Akira Utsumi, Tsukasa Mikuni, and Isamu Nagasawa. 2019. Effect of On-Road Virtual Visual References on Vehicle Control Stability of Wide/Narrow FOV Drivers. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351331
[143]
Emma van Amersfoorth, Lotte Roefs, Quinta Bonekamp, Laurent Schuermans, and Bastian Pfleging. 2019. Increasing Driver Awareness through Translucency on Windshield Displays. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351911
[144]
Matej Vengust, Boštjan Kaluža, Kristina Stojmenova, and Jaka Sodnik. 2017. NERVteh Compact Motion Based Driving Simulator. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct(Oldenburg, Germany) (AutomotiveUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 242–243. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131726.3132047
[145]
Gabriela Villalobos-Zúñiga, Tuomo Kujala, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2016. T9+HUD: Physical Keypad and HUD Can Improve Driving Performance While Typing and Driving. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (Automotive’UI 16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005453
[146]
Tamara von Sawitzky, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Joseph L. Gabbard. 2019. Increasing Trust in Fully Automated Driving: Route Indication on an Augmented Reality Head-up Display. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Palermo, Italy) (PerDis ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3321335.3324947
[147]
Alla Vovk, Fridolin Wild, Will Guest, and Timo Kuula. 2018. Simulator sickness in augmented reality training using the Microsoft HoloLens. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–9.
[148]
Chao Wang, Jacques Terken, and Jun Hu. 2014. “Liking” Other Drivers’ Behavior While Driving. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Seattle, WA, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667239.2667424
[149]
Gesa Wiegand, Christian Mai, Kai Holländer, and Heinrich Hussmann. 2019. InCarAR: A Design Space Towards 3D Augmented Reality Applications in Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344539
[150]
Gesa Wiegand, Christian Mai, Yuanting Liu, and Heinrich Hußmann. 2018. Early Take-Over Preparation in Stereoscopic 3D. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Toronto, ON, Canada) (AutomotiveUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239092.3265957
[151]
Carolin Wienrich and Kristina Schindler. 2019. Challenges and Requirements of immersive media in autonomous car: Exploring the feasibility of virtual entertainment applications.i-com 15, 1 (2019), 32–38.
[152]
Philipp Wintersberger, Anna-Katharina Frison, Andreas Riener, and Tamara von Sawitzky. 2019. Fostering User Acceptance and Trust in Fully Automated Vehicles: Evaluating the Potential of Augmented Reality. PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality 27, 1 (2019), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00320
[153]
Philipp Wintersberger, Tamara von Sawitzky, Anna-Katharina Frison, and Andreas Riener. 2017. Traffic Augmentation as a Means to Increase Trust in Automated Driving Systems. In Proceedings of the 12th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter. ACM, 17.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evaluating Autonomous Vehicle External Communication Using a Multi-Pedestrian VR SimulatorProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36785068:3(1-26)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Ground Control: Leveraging the User's Spatial Position as an Input Modality in an Embodied Immersive Analysis Use CaseProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3677477(437-441)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
  • (2024)SYNC-VR: Synchronizing Your Senses to Conquer Motion Sickness for Enriching In-Vehicle Virtual RealityProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642941(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MUM '20: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
November 2020
353 pages
ISBN:9781450388702
DOI:10.1145/3428361
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 November 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. automated driving
  2. automotive user interfaces
  3. mixed reality
  4. research agenda

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

MUM 2020

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 465 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)95
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evaluating Autonomous Vehicle External Communication Using a Multi-Pedestrian VR SimulatorProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36785068:3(1-26)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Ground Control: Leveraging the User's Spatial Position as an Input Modality in an Embodied Immersive Analysis Use CaseProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3677477(437-441)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
  • (2024)SYNC-VR: Synchronizing Your Senses to Conquer Motion Sickness for Enriching In-Vehicle Virtual RealityProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642941(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Mentorable Interfaces for Automated Vehicles: A New Paradigm for Designing Learnable Technology for Older AdultsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642390(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Portobello: Extending Driving Simulation from the Lab to the RoadProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642341(1-13)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Can You Hazard a Guess?: Evaluating the Effect of Augmented Reality Cues on Driver Hazard PredictionProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642300(1-28)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Exploring Mobile Devices as Haptic Interfaces for Mixed RealityProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642176(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Towards Adaptive AR Interfaces for Passengers of Autonomous Urban Air Mobility Vehicles: Analyzing the Impact of Flight Phases and Visibility Conditions on User Experience Through Simulation2024 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00070(351-359)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Feasibility of AR-VR use in autonomous cars for user engagements and its effects on posture and vigilance during transitTransactions on Transport Sciences10.5507/tots.2022.01914:1(4-13)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Simulating Wearable Urban Augmented Reality Experiences in VR: Lessons Learnt from Designing Two Future Urban InterfacesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti70200217:2(21)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media